skip to main content
10.1145/3159652.3159679acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Leveraging Implicit Contribution Amounts to Facilitate Microfinancing Requests

Published:02 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The emergence of online microfinancing platforms provides new opportunities for people to seek financial assistance from a large number of potential contributors. However, these platforms deal with a huge number of requests, making it hard for the requesters to get assistance for their financial needs. Designing algorithms to identify potential contributors for a given request will assist in satisfying financial needs of requesters and improve the effectiveness of microfinancing platforms. Existing work correlates requests with contributor interests and profiles to design feature based approaches for recommending projects to prospective contributors. However, contributing money to financial requests has a cost on contributors which can affect his inclination to contribute in the future . Literature in economic behavior has investigated the manner in which memory of past contribution amounts affects user inclination to contribute to a given request. To systematically investigate whether these characteristics of economic behavior would help to facilitate requests in online microfinancing platforms, we present a novel framework to identify contributors for a given request from their past financial information. Individual contribution amounts are not publicly available, so we draw from financial modeling literature to model the implicit contribution amounts made to past requests. We evaluate the framework on two microfinancing platforms to demonstrate its effectiveness in identifying contributors.

References

  1. Wei Ai, Roy Chen, Yan Chen, Qiaozhu Mei, and Webb Phillips . 2016. Recommending teams promotes prosocial lending in online microfinance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, 52 (2016), 14944--14948.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tim Althoff and Jure Leskovec . 2015. Donor retention in online crowdfunding communities: A case study of donorschoose. org WWW. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jisun An, Daniele Quercia, and Jon Crowcroft . 2014. Recommending investors for crowdfunding projects. WWW. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Paul N Bloom . 2009. Overcoming consumption constraints through social entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing Vol. 28, 1 (2009), 128--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Tillman Bruett et almbox. . 2007. Cows, Kiva, and Prosper. Com: how disintermediation and the internet are changing microfinance. Community Development Investment Review 2 (2007), 44--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Roy Chen, Yan Chen, Yang Liu, and Qiaozhu Mei . 2015. Does team competition increase pro-social lending? Evidence from online microfinance. Games and Economic Behavior (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaegul Choo, Changhyun Lee, Daniel Lee, Hongyuan Zha, and Haesun Park . 2014 b. Understanding and promoting micro-finance activities in kiva. org WSDM. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jaegul Choo, Daniel Lee, Bistra Dilkina, Hongyuan Zha, and Haesun Park . 2014 a. To gather together for a better world: understanding and leveraging communities in micro-lending recommendation. In WWW. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Shijie Deng . 2000. Stochastic models of energy commodity prices and their applications: Mean-reversion with jumps and spikes. Berkeley: University of California Energy Institute.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Merel Van Diepen, Bas Donkers, and Philip Hans Franses . 2009. Dynamic and competitive effects of direct mailings: A charitable giving application. Journal of Marketing Research Vol. 46, 1 (2009), 120--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Nicole B Ellison, Rebecca Gray, Jessica Vitak, Cliff Lampe, and Andrew T Fiore . 2013. Calling All Facebook Friends: Exploring Requests for Help on Facebook. International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Matt Flannery . 2007. Kiva and the birth of person-to-person microfinance. Innovations, Vol. 2, 1--2 (2007), 31--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeff Galak, Deborah Small, and Andrew T Stephen . 2011. Microfinance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. Journal of Marketing Research Vol. 48, SPL (2011), S130--S137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Brent Hecht, Jaime Teevan, Meredith Morris, and Dan Liebling . 2012. SearchBuddies: Bringing Search Engines into the Conversation ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Julie S Hui, Michael D Greenberg, and Elizabeth M Gerber . 2014. Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work CSCW. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jin-Woo Jeong, Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, and Dan Liebling . 2013. A Crowd-Powered Socially Embedded Search Engine. ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fang Jin, Rupinder Paul Khandpur, Nathan Self, Edward Dougherty, Sheng Guo, Feng Chen, B Aditya Prakash, and Naren Ramakrishnan . 2014. Modeling mass protest adoption in social network communities using geometric brownian motion KDD. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ioannis Karatzas and Steven Shreve . 2012. Brownian motion and stochastic calculus. Vol. Vol. 113. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel D Lee and H Sebastian Seung . 2001. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. NIPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Uichin Lee, Hyanghong Kang, Eunhee Yi, Mun Yi, and Jussi Kantola . 2012. Understanding mobile q&a usage: An exploratory study CHI. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jalal Mahmud, Michelle Zhou, Nimrod Megiddo, Jeffrey Nichols, and Clemens Drews . 2014. Optimizing the selection of strangers to answer questions in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.2013 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, and Katrina Panovich . 2010. What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message q&a behavior CHI. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Bernt Oksendal . 2003. Stochastic differential equations. Stochastic differential equations. Springer, 65--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharoda A Paul, Lichan Hong, and Ed H Chi . 2011. Is Twitter a Good Place for Asking Questions? A Characterization Study ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Craig Pirrong . 2011. Commodity price dynamics: A structural approach. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ioana Popescu and Yaozhong Wu . 2007. Dynamic pricing strategies with reference effects. Operations Research, Vol. 55, 3 (2007), 413--429. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Vineeth Rakesh, Wang-Chien Lee, and Chandan K Reddy . 2016. Probabilistic Group Recommendation Model for Crowdfunding Domains WSDM. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Suhas Ranganath, Fred Morstatter, Xia Hu, Jiliang Tang, Suhang Wang, and Huan Liu . 2016. Predicting Online Protest Participation of Social Media Users AAAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Suhas Ranganath, Jiliang Tang, Xia Hu, Hari Sundaram, and Huan Liu . 2015. Leveraging Social Foci for Information Seeking in Social Media AAAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jacob Solomon, Wenjuan Ma, and Rick Wash . 2016. Highly Successful Projects Inhibit Coordination on Crowdfunding Sites CHI. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Peter Tankov . 2003. Financial modelling with jump processes. Vol. Vol. 2. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jiang Yang, Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, Lada A Adamic, and Mark S Ackerman . 2011. Culture Matters: A Survey Study of Social Q&A Behavior. ICWSM (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yongfeng Zhang, Qi Zhao, Yi Zhang, Daniel Friedman, Min Zhang, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma . 2016. Economic recommendation with surplus maximization. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Haijun Zhou . 2003 a. Distance, dissimilarity index, and network community structure. Physical review, Vol. 67, 6 (2003), 061901.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Haijun Zhou . 2003 b. Network landscape from a Brownian particle's perspective. Physical Review E, Vol. 67, 4 (2003), 041908.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Haijun Zhou and Reinhard Lipowsky . 2004. Network brownian motion: A new method to measure vertex-vertex proximity and to identify communities and subcommunities. Computational Science-ICCS 2004. Springer, 1062--1069.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Leveraging Implicit Contribution Amounts to Facilitate Microfinancing Requests

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WSDM '18: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining
        February 2018
        821 pages
        ISBN:9781450355810
        DOI:10.1145/3159652

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 February 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WSDM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate81of514submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate498of2,863submissions,17%

        Upcoming Conference

      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader