skip to main content
10.1145/3160504.3160526acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Municipal Virtual Communities (MuViC): Expanding Cities to the Virtual World

Published:23 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Adoption of Online Social Networks keeps growing, leading to intertwine virtual life into social context. However, creating effective virtual communities with deep and meaningful interaction among members remains challenging. The factors that make a certain virtual community to bond are still not well known. We present a five-year experiment involving a Facebook Group for a city, adopted by 83% of its citizens as an extension of the city in the virtual world. A set of rules to manage the group formulated during the experiment is presented, created by observing its members' behaviour, which led to an effective management for a Municipal Virtual Group. The main rules are: (i) Unidentified profiles cannot have opinion in the group; (ii) Posts cannot be removed; (iii) It is not allowed to talk about politics beyond the city's context. Three cases that occurred in the group under such rules and their consequent impact are reported.

References

  1. Michael Angrosino. 2007. Doing ethnographic and observational research. SageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Michael S. Bernstein, Eytan Bakshy, Moira Burke, and Brian Karrer. 2013. Quantifying the invisible audience in social networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 21--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andre de Oliveira Bueno. 2016. From Smart Cities to Social Cities: Technology to Support Community Life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). 198--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andre O. Bueno and Junia C. Anacleto. 2017. Creating and Supporting Virtual Communities. A City that Happens on a Facebook Group. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Computing and Social Media. 289--306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. David B. Clark. 1973. The concept of community: a reexamination. The Sociological Review, 21,3: 397--416.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. James S. Coleman. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94: S95--S120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Facebook. 2014. The Graph API. Retrieved December 20, 2016 from https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-apiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. GEPHI. 2008. The Open Graph Viz Platform. Retrieved December 10, 2016 from https://gephi.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gernot Grabher and Oliver Ibert. 2013. Distance as asset? Knowledge collaboration in hybrid virtual communities. Journal of Economic geography, 14,1: 97--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jürgen Habermas. 1994. Three normative models of democracy. Constellations, 1:1, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Robert A. Hanneman and Mark Riddle. 2005. Introduction to social network methods. University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jennefer Hart, Charlene Ridley, Faisal Taher, Corina Sas, and Alan Dix. 2008. Exploring the Facebook experience: a new approach to usability. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges, 471--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Luke Hutton and Tristan Henderson. 2015. "I didn't sign up for this!": Informed consent in social network research. In Proceedings of the 9th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2015), 178--187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Simon Kemp. 2016. We are Social. Special Reports: Digital in 2016. Retrieved December 1, 2015 from http://wearesocial.com/uk/special-reports/digital-in-2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Research methods in human-computer interaction. Wiley Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Xianghua Lu, Chee Wei Phang, and Jie Yu. 2011. Encouraging participation in virtual communities through usability and sociability development: An empirical investigation. ACM SIGMIS Database, 42:3, 96--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Diane Maloney-Krichmar and Jenny Preece. 2005. A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI 2005), 201--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Alice E. Marwick and Danah Boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New media & society, 13:1, 114--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Abraham H. Maslow. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychological review, 50:4, 370--396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rebecca McKee. 2013. Ethical issues in using social media for health and health care research. Health Policy 110:2, 298--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Katelyn YA McKenna and John A. Bargh. 2000. Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and social psychology review, 4:1, 57--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Seong-Jae Min. 2007. Online vs. face-to-face deliberation: Effects on civic engagement. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12:4, 1369--1387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Carl Myhill. 2004. Commercial success by looking for desire lines. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction, 293--304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Taewoo Nam and Theresa A. Pardo. 2011. Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 282--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Netvizz. 2011. The Graph API. Retrieved December 21, 2016 from https://apps.facebook.com/netvizz/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Donald A. Norman and Stephen W. Draper. 1986. User centered system design. New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Deborah Phillips, Bal Athwal, David Robinson, and Malcolm Harrison. 2014. Towards intercultural engagement: building shared visions of neighbourhood and community in an era of new migration. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 40:1, 42--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Jenny Preece. 2000. Online communities: designing usability, supporting sociability. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100:9, 459--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jenny Preece. 2001. Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20:5, 347--356.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Adrian M. Reodique. 2017. More efforts needed for smart city adoption in Asia. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from https://gcio.asia/gcio/smart-cities/more-efforts-needed-for-smart-city-adoption-in-asia/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Howard Rheingold. 1993. The virtual community: Finding connection in a computerized world. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sociograph.io. 2014. Analytics for Facebook Groups and Pages. Retrieved January 7, 2017 from http://sociograph.io/my.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Lauren B. Solberg. 2010. Data mining on Facebook: A free space for researchers or an IRB nightmare. U. Ill. JL Tech. & Pol'y, 311--343.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ronald Tsao, Jennifer Preece, and Jonathan Lazar. 1999. One Foot in Cyberspace & the Other on the Ground A Case Study of Analysis and Design Issues in a Hybrid Virtual and Physical Community. WebNet Journal: Internet Technologies, Applications & Issues, 1:3, 49--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Katie J. Ward. 1999. Cyber-ethnography and the emergence of the virtually new community. Journal of Information technology, 14:1, 95--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Municipal Virtual Communities (MuViC): Expanding Cities to the Virtual World

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          IHC '17: Proceedings of the XVI Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          October 2017
          622 pages
          ISBN:9781450363778
          DOI:10.1145/3160504

          Copyright © 2017 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 October 2017

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          IHC '17 Paper Acceptance Rate66of184submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader