skip to main content
research-article

iTour: Making Tourist Maps GPS-Enabled

Published:08 January 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Although tourist maps are useful resources for people to visit scenic areas, they are also commonly distorted and omit details according to the purposes and functions of a map. In this paper, we present iTour, a semi-automatic system that turns tourist maps into digital maps. By involving users in matching the road network of a tourist map and the paired standard map, our system computes road network correspondence between the two maps. By doing so, users can navigate on such GPS-enabled tourist maps using mobile devices. This transformation creates the possibility of augmenting a large number of tourist maps with digital map features. To evaluate the performance of matching road networks, we compared the presented semi-automatic interface to a manual interface. The results showed that the semi-automatic interface saved participants significant effort in generating correspondence and was perceived to require significantly less time by the participants. In addition, we conducted a field study of the iTour in comparison to using a tourist map and Google Maps together. Our results showed that iTour helped participants find their way during travel. The participants provided positive feedback on the combination of tourist maps and GPS location because of its highlights of important landmarks, showing users' locations relative to those landmarks, and saving the effort of switching tourist maps and Google Maps.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Maneesh Agrawala and Chris Stolte. 2001. Rendering Effective Route Maps: Improving Usability Through Generalization. ACM SIGGRAPH ‘01 (2001), 241--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashweeni Kumar Beeharee and Anthony Steed. 2006. A Natural Wayfinding Exploiting Photos in Pedestrian Navigation Systems. In Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 81--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Catriel Beeri, Yaron Kanza, Eliyahu Safra, and Yehoshua Sagiv. 2004. Object Fusion in Geographic Information Systems. In International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 816--827. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Paul J. Besl and Neil D. McKay. 1992. A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14, 2 (1992), 239--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Bottger, U. Brandes, O. Deussen, and H. Ziezold. 2008. Map Warping for the Annotation of Metro Maps. In IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium. (PacificVIS ‘08). 199--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Vasile Crăciunescu, Stefan Constantinescu, Ionut Ovejanu, and Ioan Rus. 2011. Project eHarta: a collaborative initiative to digitally preserve and freely share old cartographic documents in Romania. e-Perimetron 6, 4 (2011), 261--269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael F. Davie and Mitia Frumin. 2007. Late 18th century Russian Navy maps and the first 3D visualization of the walled city of Beirut. e-Perimetron 2, 2 (2007), 52--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sperling Jonathan Demin Xiong. 2004. Semiautomated matching for network database integration: Advanced techniques for analysis of geo-spatial data. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing 59 (2004), 35--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Min Deng, Zhilin Li, and Xiaoyong Chen. 2007. Extended Hausdorff distance for spatial objects in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21, 4 (2007), 459--475. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Nathan Gale, Reginald G. Golledge, William C. Halperin, and Helen Couclelis. 1990. Exploring Spatial Familiarity. The Professional Geographer 42 (1990), 299--313. Issue 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Floraine Grabler, Maneesh Agrawala, Robert W. Sumner, and Mark Pauly. 2008. Automatic Generation of Tourist Maps. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 3, Article 100 (2008), 100:1--100:11 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Andreas Hackeloeer, Klaas Klasing, Jukka Matthias Krisp, and Liqiu Meng. 2014. Georeferencing: a review of methods and applications. Annals of GIS 20, 1 (2014), 61--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jean-François Hangouët. 1995. Computation of the Hausdorff Distance between Plane Vector Polyline. In AutoCarto Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jan-Henrik Haunert and Leon Sering. 2011. Drawing Road Networks with Focus Regions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2555--2562. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mary Hegarty, Anthony E Richardson, Daniel R Montello, and Ilavanil Subbiah. 2002. Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence 30 (2002), 425--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Takeo Igarashi, Tomer Moscovich, and John F. Hughes. 2005. As-rigid-as-possible Shape Manipulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3 (2005), 1134--1141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Bernhard Jenny. 2006. Geometric distortion of schematic network maps. Bulletin of the Society of Cartographers 40, 1 (2006), 15--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Patrick W. Jordan, B. Thomas, Ian Lyall McClelland, and Bernard Weerdmeester. 1996. Usability Evaluation In Industry. CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Petr Pěidal Kimberly C. Kowal. 2012. Online Georeferencing for Libraries: The British Library Implementation of Georeferencer for Spatial Metadata Enhancement and Public Engagement. Journal of Map And Geography Libraries 8 (2012), 276--289. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Daisuke Kitayama and Kazutoshi Sumiya. 2012. A Deformation Analysis Method for Artificial Maps Based on Geographical Accuracy and Its Applications. In Proceedings of the Joint WICOW/AIRWeb Workshop on Web Quality. 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Johannes Kopf, Maneesh Agrawala, David Bargeron, David Salesin, and Michael Cohen. 2010. Automatic Generation of Destination Maps. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 6, Article 158 (2010), 158:1--158:12 pages.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shih-Syun Lin, Chao-Hung Lin, Yan-Jhang Hu, and Tong-Yee Lee. 2014. Drawing Road Networks with Mental Maps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 9 (2014), 1241--1252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Anthony E. Lupien and William H. Moreland. 1987. A General Approach to Map Conflation. In International Symposium on Computer Assisted Cartography. 630--639.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Daniela Mantel and Udo Lipeck. 2004. Matching Cartographic Objects in Spatial Databases. In ISPRS Congress, Comm. IV. 172--176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Süleyman Sirri Maras, Hakan Hadi Maras, Bahadir Aktuğ, Erdem Emin Maras, and Ferruh Yildiz. 2010. Topological error correction of GIS vector data. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 5, 5 (2010), 61--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ariane Mascret, Thomas Devogele, Iwan Le Berre, and Alain Henaff. 2006. Coastline matching process based on the discrete Frechet distance. In International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. 383--400. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Sébastien Mustiére and Thomas Devogele. 2008. Matching Networks with Different Levels of Detail. Geoinformatica 12, 4 (2008), 435--453. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Kálmán Palágyi and Attila Kuba. 1999. A Parallel 3D 12-Subiteration Thinning Algorithm. Graphical Models and Image Processing 61, 4 (1999), 199--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Derek F. Reilly and Kori M. Inkpen. 2004. Map Morphing: Making Sense of Incongruent Maps. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface. 231--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Juan J. Ruiz, F. Javier Ariza, Manuel A. Urena, and Elidia B. Blazquez. 2011. Digital Map Conflation: A Review of the Process and a Proposal for Classification. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 25, 9 (2011), 1439--1466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Alan Saalfeld. 1988. Conflation: Automated Map Compilation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 2, 3 (1988), 217--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Eliyahu Safra, Yaron Kanza, Yehoshua Sagiv, and Yerach Doytsher. 2013. Ad Hoc Matching of Vectorial Road Networks. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 27, 1 (2013), 114--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Johannes Schöning, Brent Hecht, and Werner Kuhn. 2014. Informing Online and Mobile Map Design with the Collective Wisdom of Cartographers. In Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 765--774. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Johannes Schöning, Antonio Krüger, Keith Cheverst, Michael Rohs, Markus Löchtefeld, and Faisal Taher. 2009. PhotoMap: Using Spontaneously Taken Images of Public Maps for Pedestrian Navigation Tasks on Mobile Devices. MobileHCI ‘09, Article 14 (2009), 14:1--14:10 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Hyewon Suh, Nina Shahriaree, Eric B. Hekler, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Developing and Validating the User Burden Scale: A Tool for Assessing User Burden in Computing Systems. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3988--3999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Barbara Tversky. 2000. Some Ways that Maps and Diagrams Communicate.. In Spatial Cognition, Vol. 1849. Springer, 72--79. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. G. v. Gosseln and M. Sester. 2004. Integration of geoscientific data sets and the german digital map using a matching approach. In AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science. 31--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Tuomas Vaittinen and David McGookin. 2016. Phases of Urban Tourists' Exploratory Navigation: A Field Study. In ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. 1111--1122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Steffen Volz. 2006. An Iterative Approach for Matching Multiple Representations of Street Data. In Proceedings of the ISPRS Workshop on Multiple Representations and Interoperability of Spatial Data. ISPRS, 101--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Steffen Volz and Volker Walter. 2004. Linking different geospatial databases by explicit relations. In ISPRS Congress, Comm. IV. 152--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Volker Walter and Dieter Fritsch. 1999. Matching spatial data sets: a statistical approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13, 5 (1999), 445--473. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Fangzhou Wang, Yang Li, Daisuke Sakamoto, and Takeo Igarashi. 2014. Hierarchical route maps for efficient navigation. In International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 169--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Shuxin Yuan and Dr. Chuang Tao. 1999. Development of Conflation Components. In Geoinformatics, Ann Arbor. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Meng Zhang and Liqiu Meng. 2007. An iterative road-matching approach for the integration of postal data. Computers, environment and urban systems 31, 5 (2007), 598--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Q. Zhang and I. Couloigner. 2005. Spatio-Temporal Modeling in Road Network Change Detection and Updating. In International Symposium on Spatiotemporal Modeling, Spatial Reasoning, Analysis, Data Mining and Data Fusion.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. iTour: Making Tourist Maps GPS-Enabled

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
      Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 1, Issue 4
      December 2017
      1298 pages
      EISSN:2474-9567
      DOI:10.1145/3178157
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 January 2018
      • Accepted: 1 November 2017
      • Revised: 1 August 2017
      • Received: 1 February 2017
      Published in imwut Volume 1, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader