skip to main content
10.1145/3167132.3167349acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Accessibility and usability problems encountered on websites and applications in mobile devices by blind and normal-vision users

Published:09 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper aimed to investigate the accessibility problems encountered by visually disabled and mainstream users on websites and native applications using mobile devices. A total of 10 participants, consisting of 6 blind users and 4 mainstream users took part in this study. A sample of 4 websites and their respective 4 native applications from commercial and governmental organizations were selected and evaluated by means of usability tests. The evaluation resulted in a total of 514 problems encountered, being 409 by blind users and 105 by normal-vision users. The most frequent and most severe problems encountered by blind users on the mobile applications and websites are detailed and compared to the impact they had on mainstream users. The results show initial evidence of critical problems that need to be addressed in the development of mobile applications and websites. Further, they point out to the need of performing more in-depth investigation of accessibility problems encountered by users with visual disabilities to establish effective recommendations to designers. The paper also showed that blind users were more severely impacted by problems in such devices than normal-vision users.

References

  1. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). 2013. BBC Standards and Guidelines for Mobile Accessibility. http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/futuremedia/accessibility/mobile. (2013). Accessed: 2017-02-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben Caldwell, Michael Cooper, and Gregg Reid, Loretta Guarino Vanderheiden. 2013. BBC Standards and Guidelines for Mobile Accessibility. http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/futuremedia/accessibility/mobile. (2013). Accessed: 2017-02-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rafael Jeferson Pezzuto Damaceno, Juliana Cristina Braga, and Jesús Pascual Mena-Chalco. 2017. Mobile device accessibility for the visually impaired: problems mapping and recommendations. Universal Access in the Information Society (04 May 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Andre Pimenta Freire. 2012. Disabled people and the Web: User-based measurement of accessibility. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of York, Department of Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Ghidini, W.D.L. Almeida, I.H. Manssour, and M.S. Silveira. 2016. Developing apps for visually impaired people: Lessons learned from practice. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Vol. 2016-March. 5691--5700. cited By 0. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Vicki L. Hanson and John T. Richards. 2013. Progress on Website Accessibility? ACM Trans. Web 7, 1, Article 2 (March 2013), 30 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Shaun K Kane, Jacob O Wobbrock, and Richard E Ladner. 2011. Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hyun K. Kim, Sung H. Han, Jaehyun Park, and Joohwan Park. 2016. The interaction experiences of visually impaired people with assistive technology: A case study of smartphones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 55 (2016), 22 -- 33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2010. Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R Molich. 2007. In Usable Web Design. Narayana Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Helen Petrie and Omar Kheir. 2007. The Relationship Between Accessibility and Usability of Websites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 397--406. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lara Schibelsky G. Piccolo, Ewerton M. De Menezes, and Bruno De Campos Buccolo. 2011. Developing an Accessible Interaction Model for Touch Screen Mobile Devices: Preliminary Results. In Proceedings of the 10th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems and the 5th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (IHC+CLIHC '11). Brazilian Computer Society, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Brazil, 222--226. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2254436.2254474 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Christopher Power, André Freire, Helen Petrie, and David Swallow. 2012. Guidelines Are Only Half of the Story: Accessibility Problems Encountered by Blind Users on the Web. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 433--442. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Clauirton Siebra, Tatiana Gouveia, Jefte Macedo, Walter Correia, Marcelo Penha, Marcelo Anjos, Fabiana Florentin, Fabio Q. B. Silva, and Andre L. M. Santos. 2016. Observation Based Analysis on the Use of Mobile Applications for Visually Impaired Users. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 807--814. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Clauirton A. Siebra, Tatiana B. Gouveia, Anderson Filho, Walter Correia, Marcelo Penha, Marcelo Anjos, Fabiana Florentin, Fabio Q.B. Silva, and Andre L.M. Santos. 2015. Usability for Accessibility: A Consolidation of Requirements for Mobile Applications. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (ASSETS '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 321--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Statcounter. 2016. Desktop vs Mobile vs Tablet Market Share Worldwide 2016 - Jan to Dec 2016. http://gs.statcounter.com/platform-market-share/desktop-mobile-tablet/worldwide/2016. (2016). Accessed: 2017-02-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). 2016. Mobile Accessibility: How WCAG 2.0 and Other W3C/WAI Guidelines Apply to Mobile. https://www.w3.org/standards/webdesign/accessibility. (2016). Accessed: 2017-02-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Accessibility and usability problems encountered on websites and applications in mobile devices by blind and normal-vision users

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SAC '18: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
      April 2018
      2327 pages
      ISBN:9781450351911
      DOI:10.1145/3167132

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader