skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3170612acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Bridging a Bridge: Bringing Two HCI Communities Together

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

ACM SIGCHI is the largest association for professionals in HCI that bridges computer science, information science, as well as the social and psychological sciences. Meanwhile, a parallel HCI community was formed in 2001 within the Association of Information Systems (AIS SIGHCI) community. While some researchers have already bridged these two HCI sub-disciplines, the history and core values of these respective fields are quite different, offering new insights for how we can move forward together to sustain the future of HCI research. The main goal of this workshop is to begin building a bridge between these two communities to maximize the relevance, rigor, and generalizability of HCI research.

References

  1. Mara Balestrini, Yvonne Rogers, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Civically Engaged HCI: Tensions Between Novelty and Social Impact. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference, 35--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mara Balestrini, Yvonne Rogers, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Civically Engaged HCI: Tensions Between Novelty and Social Impact. In Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference (British HCI '15), 35--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Izak Benbasat and Robert Zmud. 2003. The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties. Management Information Systems Quarterly 27, 2. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol27/iss2/2 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Izak Benbasat and Robert W. Zmud. 1999. Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance. MIS Q. 23, 1: 3--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anol Bhattacherjee. 2012. Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices. Textbooks Collection. Retrieved from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Adrian K. Clear, Chris Preist, Somya Joshi, Lisa P. Nathan, Samuel Mann, and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2015. Expanding the Boundaries: A SIGCHI HCI & Sustainability Workshop. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15), 2373--2376. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Paul Dourish. 2006. Implications for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06), 541--550. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Line Dubé and Guy Paré. 2003. Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices, Trends, and Recommendations. MIS Quarterly 27, 4: 597--636. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Robert D. Galliers. 2003. Change as Crisis or Growth? Toward a Trans-disciplinary View of Information Systems as a Field of Study: A Response to Benbasat and Zmud's Call for Returning to the IT Artifact. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4, 1. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol4/iss1/13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. William Gaver. 2012. What Should We Expect from Research Through Design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12), 937--946. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Shirley Gregor. 2006. The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 30, 3: 611--642. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Alan R. Hevner, Salvatore T. March, Jinsoo Park, and Sudha Ram. 2004. Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Q. 28, 1: 75--105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Matthew Kay, Steve Haroz, Shion Guha, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2016. Special Interest Group on Transparent Statistics in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 1081--1084. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Damodar Konda. 2012. Rigor and Relevance in Information Systems Research: A Comprehensive IS Research Process Model. http://services.igiglobal.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/978-1-4666-0179-6.ch002: 18--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Amir Manian, Mona Jamporazmey, and Mohammad Hussein Sherkat. 2014. Positivism in Information Systems: Investigating Paradox Between Theory and Practice in IS Researches. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 16, 1: 72--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Joseph McGrath. 1981. Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist 25, 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Ping Zhang, and Scott McCoy. 2005. Introduction: Human-Computer Interaction Studies in Management Information Systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 19, 1: 3--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Wanda J. Orlikowski and C. Suzanne Iacono. 2001. Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact. Information Systems Research 12, 2: 121--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jacob Wobbrock and Julie Kientz. 2016. Research Contributions in Human-Computer Interaction. INTERACTIONS 23, 38--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ping Zhang, Izak Benbasat, Jane Carey, Fred Davis, Dennis F. Galletta, and Diane M. Strong. 2002. Human-Computer Interaction Research in the MIS Discipline. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2352610Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ping Zhang, Dennis F. Galletta, and Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah. 2005. AIS SIGCHI Position Paper. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2352644Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. ACM History - Association for Computing Machinery. Retrieved October 11, 2017 from http://www.acm.org/about/historyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. CHI 2005: Development Consortium. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://www.chi2005.org/cfp/devcon.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Bridging a Bridge: Bringing Two HCI Communities Together

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      3155 pages
      ISBN:9781450356213
      DOI:10.1145/3170427

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader