skip to main content
10.1145/3170427.3188650acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

"It's Just that Visceral": Eliciting Design Insight Using Beaded Representations of Online Course Structure

Published:20 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We explore an unconventional format for representing the structure of online courses-beaded representations. We used this format as a mediational tool to engage a design team in reflective discussion about the design of its courses. We discuss challenges associated with the design of "massive open online courses" (MOOCs) and position beaded representations within the context of human-computer interaction (HCI) literature on materiality, novel representational forms, and the use of boundary objects to support design teams. We describe the outcomes of a focus group session with design team members mediated by the beaded representations, which include: (1) discovery of curricular connections, (2) understanding of learner experience, (3) insights about the design process, and (4) reflection on the method.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

lbw1622-file3.mp4

mp4

6.2 MB

References

  1. Ernesto Arias, Hal Eden, and Gerhard Fischer. 1997. Enhancing communication, facilitating shared understanding, and creating better artifacts by integrating physical and computational media for design. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '97), 112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. John W. Creswell. 2015. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Grainne Conole. 2010. An overview of design representations. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, 482--489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Sarah Pennington and Brendan Walker. 2004. Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty. Interactions - Funology, 11(5), 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shad Gross, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2014. Structures, forms, and stuff: the materiality and medium of interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 637--649. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Melissa J. Rogerson, Martin Gibbs, and Wally SMassachusetts Institute of Technologyh. 2016. "I Love All the Bits": the materiality of boardgames. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 3956--3969. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Anoush Margaryan, Manuela Bianco, and Allison Littlejohn. 2015. Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, vol 80, 77--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Joshua Powers. 2015. Visualizing online learning to demonstrate course structure and provide intelligent feedback. Georgia Tech Library. Retrieved July 24, 2017, from https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/54519Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rebecca Quintana, Yuanru Tan, and Noni Korf. 2018. Visualizing course structure: Using course composition diagrams to reflect on design. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). April 1317. New York, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Daniel Seaton. 2016. Exploring course structure at HarvardX: a new year's resolution for MOOC research {blogpost}. Retrieved January 20, 2017 from https://vpal.harvard.edu/blog/exploringcourse-structure-harvardx-new-year's-resolutionmooc-research.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "It's Just that Visceral": Eliciting Design Insight Using Beaded Representations of Online Course Structure

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '18: Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2018
        3155 pages
        ISBN:9781450356213
        DOI:10.1145/3170427

        Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 April 2018

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI EA '18 Paper Acceptance Rate1,208of3,955submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader