ABSTRACT
Self-presentation is a process that is significantly complicated by the rise of algorithmic social media feeds, which obscure information about one's audience and environment. User understandings of these systems, and therefore user ability to adapt to them, are limited, and have recently been explored through the lens of folk theories. To date, little is understood of how these theories are formed, and how they tie to the self-presentation process in social media. This paper presents an exploratory look at the folk theory formation process and the interplay between folk theories and self-presentation via a 28-participant interview study. Results suggest that people draw from diverse sources of information when forming folk theories, and that folk theories are more complex, multifaceted and malleable than previously assumed. This highlights the need to integrate folk theories into both social media systems and theories of self-presentation.
- Robert M Arkin. 1981. Self-Presentation Styles. In Impression Management Theory and Social Psychological Research, James T Tedeschi (ed.). Academic Press, New York, NY, 311--334.Google Scholar
- Jeremy Birnholtz, Colin Fitzpatrick, Mark Handel, and Jed R Brubaker. 2014. Identity, identification and identifiability: The language of self-presentation on a location-based mobile dating app. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on HumanComputer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, 3--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glenn A Bowen. 2006. Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International journal of qualitative methods, 5, 3: 12--23.Google Scholar
- Taina Bucher. 2016. The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20, 1: 30--44.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kathy Charmaz and Liska Belgrave. 2002. Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. In The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft (2nd), Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir B. Marvasti and Karyn D. McKinney (ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 347--365.Google Scholar
- Michael A. DeVito, Jeremy Birnholtz, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2017. Platforms, People, and Perception: Using Affordances to Understand Self-Presentation on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 740--754. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael A. DeVito, Darren Gergle, and Jeremy Birnholtz. 2017. "Algorithms ruin everything": #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3163--3174. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2015. Algorithmic accountability: Journalistic investigation of computational power structures. Digital Journalism, 3, 3: 398--415.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maeve Duggan. 2015. Mobile Messaging and Social Media 2015. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Nicole B. Ellison and Jessica Vitak. 2015. Social network site affordances and their relationship to social capital processes. In The Handbook of the Psychology of Communication Technology, S. Shyam Sundar (ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 205--227.Google Scholar
- Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 34rd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2371--2382. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to {her}": Reasoning about invisible algorithms in the news feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 153--162. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew Fisher, Joshua Knobe, Brent Strickland, and Frank C Keil. 2016. The influence of social interaction on intuitions of objectivity and subjectivity. Cognitive Science, 41, 4: 1119--1134.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Megan French and Jeff T. Hancock. 2017. What's the Folk Theory? Reasoning About Cyber-Social Systems. Paper presented at the 67th Annual Confrence of the International Communication Association (San Diego, CA).Google Scholar
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2014. The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society, Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski and Kirsten Foot (ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 167--193.Google Scholar
- Erving Goffman. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Shannon Greenwood, Andrew Perrin, and Maeve Duggan. 2016. Social Media Update 2016. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Eszter Hargittai and Yuli Patrick Hsieh. 2012. Succinct survey measures of web-use skills. Social Science Computer Review, 30, 1: 95--107. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eszter Hargittai and Eden Litt. 2013. New strategies for employment? internet skills and online privacy practices during people's job search. IEEE Security & Privacy, 11, 3: 38--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eszter Hargittai and Alice Marwick. 2016. "What Can I Really Do?" Explaining the Privacy Paradox with Online Apathy. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2016: 3737--3757.Google Scholar
- Natalie Jones, Helen Ross, Timothy Lynam, Pascal Perez, and Anne Leitch. 2011. Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods. Ecology and Society, 16, 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anne R Kearney and Stephen Kaplan. 1997. Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people the conceptual content cognitive map (3CM). Environment and Behavior, 29, 5: 579--617.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frank C Keil. 2003. Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex reality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 8: 368--373.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frank C Keil. 2010. The feasibility of folk science. Cognitive science, 34, 5: 826--862.Google Scholar
- Frank C Keil. 2012. Running on empty? How folk science gets by with less. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 5: 329--334.Google ScholarCross Ref
- René F Kizilcec. 2016. How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2390--2395. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark R. Leary and Robin M. Kowalski. 1990. Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 1: 34--47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Lennox. 1988. The problem with selfmonitoring: A two-sided scale and a one-sided theory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 1: 58--73.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, knock. Who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56, 3: 330--345.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eden Litt. 2013. Understanding social network site users' privacy tool use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 4: 1649--1656. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eden Litt and Eszter Hargittai. 2016. The imagined audience on social network sites. Social Media+ Society, 2, 1: 1--12.Google Scholar
- Eden Litt and Eszter Hargittai. 2016. "Just Cast the Net, and Hopefully the Right Fish Swim into It": Audience Management on Social Network Sites. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1488--1500. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eden Litt, Erin Spottswood, Jeremy Birnholtz, Jeff T. Hancock, Madeline E. Smith, and Lindsay Reynolds. 2014. Awkward encounters of an other kind: collective self-presentation and face threat on facebook. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 449--460. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alice E. Marwick and danah boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13, 1: 114--133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew B Miles and A Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Donald A. Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frank Pasquale. 2015. The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Google Scholar
- Frank A Pasquale. 2011. Restoring transparency to automated authority. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 9, 2011: 235--254.Google Scholar
- Stephen J Payne. 2003. Users' mental models: The very ideas. In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, John M Carroll (ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA, 135--156.Google Scholar
- Peter Pirolli. 2007. Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 1999. Information foraging. Psychological review, 106, 4: 643.Google Scholar
- Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 173--182. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee Rainie and Janna Anderson. 2017. CodeDependent: Pros and Cons of the Algorithm Age. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Jenny Rosenberg and Nichole Egbert. 2011. Online impression management: Personality traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of selfpresentation tactics on Facebook. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 17, 2011: 1--18.Google Scholar
- Leonid Rozenblit and Frank Keil. 2002. The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive science, 26, 5: 521--562.Google Scholar
- Gwendolyn Seidman. 2013. Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 3: 402--407.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew Shtulman and Tania Lombrozo. 2016. Bundles of contradiction: A coexistence view of conceptual change. In Core Knowledge and Conceptual Change, D. Barner and A.S. Baron (ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 53--72.Google Scholar
- Martina Mahnke Skrubbeltrang, Josefine Grunnet, and Nicolai Traasdahl Tarp. 2017. #RIPINSTAGRAM: Examining user's counter-narratives opposing the introduction of algorithmic personalization on Instagram. First Monday, 22, 4.Google Scholar
- Mark Snyder. 1974. Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 30, 4: 526.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kjerstin Thorson and Chris Wells. 2015. Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory, 26, 3: 309--328.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karl E Weick, Kathleen M Sutcliffe, and David Obstfeld. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization science, 16, 4: 409--421. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth Whittaker and Robin M. Kowalski. 2015. Cyberbullying via social media. Journal of School Violence, 14, 1: 11--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- How People Form Folk Theories of Social Media Feeds and What it Means for How We Study Self-Presentation
Recommendations
Understanding the Dynamics of Young People's Self-Presentation on Social Media
SIGMIS-CPR'18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People ResearchSocial media provides a flexible platform for self-presentation, which is one of the prominent functions used by young people. Young people post profile pictures, status updates, images and videos about their lives. However, the truthfulness of self-...
"Algorithms ruin everything": #RIPTwitter, Folk Theories, and Resistance to Algorithmic Change in Social Media
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAs algorithmically-driven content curation has become an increasingly common feature of social media platforms, user resistance to algorithmic change has become more frequent and visible. These incidents of user backlash point to larger issues such as ...
Anonymity, Intimacy and Self-Disclosure in Social Media
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSelf-disclosure is rewarding and provides significant benefits for individuals, but it also involves risks, especially in social media settings. We conducted an online experiment to study the relationship between content intimacy and willingness to self-...
Comments