skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173916acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Support for Social and Cultural Capital Development in Real-time Ridesharing Services

Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today's transportation systems and technologies have the potential to transform the ways individuals acquire resources from their social networks and environments. However, it is unclear what types of resources can be acquired and how technology could support these efforts. We address this gap by investigating these questions in the domain of real-time ridesharing systems. We present insights from two qualitative studies: (1) a set of semi-structured interviews with 13 Uber drivers and (2) a set of semi-structured interviews with 13 Uber riders. Our results show that both drivers and riders acquired and benefited from informational, emotional and instrumental resources, as well as cultural exchanges via interactions with each other and with online platforms. We argue that these interactions could support the development of social and cultural capital. We discuss our findings in the context of labor and contribute design implications for in-car social and cultural experiences and for the ways technologies such as GPS and location-based services can support the additional emotional, social, and cultural labor that drivers provide to their riders.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3094.mp4

mp4

183.1 MB

References

  1. Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Nicola J. Bidwell, Himanshu Zade, Srihari H. Muralidhar, Anupama Dhareshwar, Baneen Karachiwala, Cedrick N. Tandong, and Jacki O'Neill. 2016. Peer-to-peer in the Workplace: A View from the Road. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5063--5075. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lawrence Bobo, James Johnson, Melvin Oliver, Reynolds Farley, Barry Bluestone, Irene Browne, Sheldon Danziger, Gary Green, Harry Holzer, Maria Krysan, and others. 2000. Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality, 1992--1994 {Atlanta, Boston, Detroit, and Los Angeles}. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research (2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pierre Bourdieu. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, Santa Barbara, CA, 241--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Margot Brereton and Sunil Ghelawat. 2010. Designing for Participation in Local Social Ridesharing Networks: Grass Roots Prototyping of IT Systems. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 199--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Barry Brown and Eric Laurier. 2012. The Normal Natural Troubles of Driving with GPS. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1621--1630. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Noel Cass, Elizabeth Shove, and John Urry. 2005. Social exclusion, mobility and access. Sociological Review 53, 3 (2005), 539--555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brian Caulfield. 2009. Estimating the environmental benefits of ride-sharing: A case study of Dublin. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 14, 7 (2009), 527--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Blerim Cici, Athina Markopoulou, Enrique Frias-Martinez, and Nikolaos Laoutaris. 2014. Assessing the Potential of Ride-sharing Using Mobile and Social Data: A Tale of Four Cities. ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (2014), 201--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. James S. Coleman. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociology 94 (1988), S95--S120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Graham Currie and Janet Stanley. 2008. Investigating Links between Social Capital and Public Transport. Transport Reviews 28, 4 (2008), 529--547.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Tawanna R. Dillahunt. 2014. Fostering Social Capital in Economically Distressed Communities. In CHI 2014. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 531--540. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Tawanna R. Dillahunt, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Linfeng Li, and Tanya Rosenblat. 2017a. Uncovering the Values and Constraints of Real-time Ridesharing for Low-resource Populations. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2757--2769. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tawanna R. Dillahunt, Xinyi Wang, Earnest Wheeler, Hao Fei Cheng, Brent Hecht, and Haiyi Zhu. 2017b. The Sharing Economy in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 38 (Dec. 2017), 26 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sara Ferlander. 2007. The Importance of Different Forms of Social Capital for Health. Acta Sociologica 50, 2 (2007), 115--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jon Froehlich, Tawanna Dillahunt, Predrag Klasnja, Jennifer Mankoff, Sunny Consolvo, Beverly Harrison, and James A. Landay. 2009. UbiGreen: Investigating a Mobile Tool for Tracking and Supporting Green Transportation Habits. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1043--1052. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mareike Glöss, Moira McGregor, and Barry Brown. 2016. Designing for Labour: Uber and the On-Demand Mobile Workforce. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1632--1643. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mark S Granovetter. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nicole Gridling, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2012. I Need Help!: Exploring Collaboration in the Car. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work Companion (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 87--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Catherine A. Heaney and Barbara A Israel. 2008. Social networks and social support. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice 4 (2008), 189--210.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Samuli Hemminki, Petteri Nurmi, and Sasu Tarkoma. 2013. Accelerometer-based Transportation Mode Detection on Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao and Tawanna R. Dillahunt. 2017. People-Nearby Applications: How Newcomers Move Their Relationships Offline and Develop Social and Cultural Capital. In Proceedings of the ACM 2017 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '17). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ing-Marie Jonsson, Clifford Nass, Jack Endo, Ben Reaves, Helen Harris, Janice Le Ta, Nicholas Chan, and Sean Knapp. 2004. Don't Blame Me I Am Only the Driver: Impact of Blame Attribution on Attitudes and Attention to Driving Task. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1219--1222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hyunggu Jung, Victoria Bellotti, Afsaneh Doryab, Dean Leitersdorf, Jiawei Chen, Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Sooyeon Lee, Dan Turner, Anind K. Dey, and John M. Carroll. 2016. 'MASTerful' Matchmaking in Service Transactions: Inferred Abilities, Needs and Interests Versus Activity Histories. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1644--1655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Antti Jylhä, Petteri Nurmi, Miika Sirén, Samuli Hemminki, and Giulio Jacucci. 2013. MatkaHupi: A Persuasive Mobile Application for Sustainable Mobility. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (UbiComp '13 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 227--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. L. Kun, S. Boll, and A. Schmidt. 2016. Shifting Gears: User Interfaces in the Age of Autonomous Driving. IEEE Pervasive Computing 15, 1 (Jan.-Mar. 2016), 32--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Catherine Penny Hinson Langford, Juanita Bowsher, Joseph P. Maloney, and Patricia P. Lillis. 1997. Social support: a conceptual analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25, 1 (1997), 95--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish. 2015. Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1603--1612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Carleen Maitland and Eric Obeysekare. 2015. The Creation of Capital through an ICT-based Learning Program: A Case Study of MOOC Camp. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 10 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kohei Matsumura and Yasuyuki Sumi. 2014. What Are You Talking About While Driving?: An Analysis of In-car Conversations Aimed at Conversation Sharing. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 34, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Johanna Meurer, Martin Stein, David Randall, Markus Rohde, and Volker Wulf. 2014. Social Dependency and Mobile Autonomy: Supporting Older Adults' Mobility with Ridesharing Ict. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1923--1932. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Daniel Münter, Anna Kötteritzsch, Tobias Islinger, Thorsten Köhler, Christian Wolff, and Jürgen Ziegler. 2012. Improving Navigation Support by Taking Care of Drivers' Situational Needs. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Alex Nunn, Steve Johnson, Surya Monro, Tim Bickerstaffe, and Sarah Kelsey. 2007. Factors influencing social mobility. Department for Work and Pensions, research report No. 450.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Fatih Kursat Ozenc, Lorrie F. Cranor, and James H. Morris. 2011. Adapt-a-ride: Understanding the Dynamics of Commuting Preferences Through an Experience Design Framework. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 61, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Steven Poole. 2014. The truth about smart cities: "In the end, they will destroy democracy'. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Robert D. Putnam. 2000. Bowling Alone. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Noopur Raval and Paul Dourish. 2016. Standing Out from the Crowd: Emotional Labor, Body Labor, and Temporal Labor in Ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 97--107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Felix Requena. 2003. Social capital, satisfaction and quality of life in the workplace. Social Indicators Research 61, 3 (2003), 331--360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Alex Rosenblat and Tim Hwang. 2016. Regional Diversity in Autonomy and Work: A Case Study from Uber and Lyft Drivers. Intelligence and Autonomy 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Alireza Sahami Shirazi, Thomas Kubitza, Florian Alt, Bastian Pfleging, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2010. WEtransport: A Context-based Ride Sharing Platform. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference Adjunct Papers on Ubiquitous Computing - Adjunct (UbiComp '10 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 425--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Johnny Saldana. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. David W. Shideler. 2005. Individual social captial: an analysis of factors influencing investment. Ph.D. Dissertation. The Ohio State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Leon Stenneth, Ouri Wolfson, Philip S. Yu, and Bo Xu. 2011. Transportation Mode Detection Using Mobile Phones and GIS Information. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 54--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Thomas J. Sugrue. 2014. The origins of the urban crisis: Race and inequality in postwar Detroit. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Johannes Tulusan, Thorsten Staake, and Elgar Fleisch. 2012. Providing Eco-driving Feedback to Corporate Car Drivers: What Impact Does a Smartphone Application Have on Their Fuel Efficiency?. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 212--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Thomas Ashby Wills. 1991. Social support and interpersonal relationships. In M.S. Clark (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 12. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 265--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Johanna Ylipulli. 2015. A smart and ubiquitous urban future? Contrasting large-scale agendas and street-level dreams. Observatorio (OBS*) 9, ESPECIAL (2015), 85--110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. John Zimmerman, Anthony Tomasic, Charles Garrod, Daisy Yoo, Chaya Hiruncharoenvate, Rafae Aziz, Nikhil Ravi Thiruvengadam, Yun Huang, and Aaron Steinfeld. 2011. Field trial of tiramisu: Crowd-sourcing bus arrival times to spur co-design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1677--1686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Support for Social and Cultural Capital Development in Real-time Ridesharing Services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader