skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173982acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Interactive Feedforward for Improving Performance and Maintaining Intrinsic Motivation in VR Exergaming

Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Exergames commonly use low to moderate intensity exercise protocols. Their effectiveness in implementing high intensity protocols remains uncertain. We propose a method for improving performance while maintaining intrinsic motivation in high intensity VR exergaming. Our method is based on an interactive adaptation of the feedforward method: a psychophysical training technique achieving rapid improvement in performance by exposing participants to self models showing previously unachieved performance levels. We evaluated our method in a cycling-based exergame. Participants competed against (i) a self model which represented their previous speed; (ii) a self model representing their previous speed but increased resistance therefore requiring higher performance to keep up; or (iii) a virtual competitor at the same two levels of performance. We varied participants' awareness of these differences. Interactive feedforward led to improved performance while maintaining intrinsic motivation even when participants were aware of the interventions, and was superior to competing against a virtual competitor.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

suppl.mov

Supplemental video

pn3445.mp4
suppl.mov

Supplemental video

References

  1. Konstantinos Alexandris, Charalambos Tsorbatzoudis, and George Grouios. 2002. Perceived constraints on recreational sport participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Journal of Leisure Research 34, 3 (2002), 233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. James Annesi. 2003. Effects of a cognitive behavioral treatment package on exercise attendance and drop out in fitness centers. European Journal of Sport Science 3, 2 (2003), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. James J Annesi. 1998. Effects of computer feedback on adherence to exercise. Perceptual and Motor Skills 87, 2 (1998), 723--730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bruce W Bailey and Kyle McInnis. 2011. Energy cost of exergaming: a comparison of the energy cost of 6 forms of exergaming. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 165, 7 (2011), 597--602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Rosa M Banos, Patricia Escobar, Ausias Cebolla, Jaime Guixeres, Julio Alvarez Pitti, Juan Francisco Lisón, and Cristina Botella. 2016. Using virtual reality to distract overweight children from bodily sensations during exercise. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 19, 2 (2016), 115--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jonathan D Bartlett, Graeme L Close, Don PM MacLaren, Warren Gregson, Barry Drust, and James P Morton. 2011. High-intensity interval running is perceived to be more enjoyable than moderate-intensity continuous exercise: implications for exercise adherence. Journal of Sports Sciences 29, 6 (2011), 547--553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Elaine Biddiss and Jennifer Irwin. 2010. Active video games to promote physical activity in children and youth: a systematic review. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 164, 7 (2010), 664--672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. John Bolton, Mike Lambert, Denis Lirette, and Ben Unsworth. 2014. PaperDude: a virtual reality cycling exergame. In Proc. CHI Extended Abstracts. ACM, 475--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kerri N Boutelle, Robert W Jeffery, and Simone A French. 2004. Predictors of vigorous exercise adoption and maintenance over four years in a community sample. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 1, 1 (2004), 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Emily Brown and Paul Cairns. 2004. A grounded investigation of game immersion. In Proc. CHI extended abstracts. ACM, 1297--1300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mert Canat, Mustafa Ozan Tezcan, Celalettin Yurdakul, Eran Tiza, Buğra Can Sefercik, Idil Bostan, Oğuz Turan Buruk, Tilbe Göksun, and Oğuzhan Özcan. 2016. Sensation: Measuring the Effects of a Human-to-Human Social Touch Based Controller on the Player Experience. In Proc. CHI. ACM, 3944--3955. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Rachel B Clancy, Matthew P Herring, and Mark J Campbell. 2017. Motivation Measures in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Shannon E Clark and Diane M Ste-Marie. 2007. The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children's self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences 25, 5 (2007), 577--586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jo Corbett, Martin J Barwood, Alex Ouzounoglou, Richard Thelwell, and Matthew Dicks. 2012. Influence of competition on performance and pacing during cycling exercise. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 44, 3 (2012), 509--515.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1975. Play and intrinsic rewards. Journal of Humanistic Psychology (1975).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rod K Dishman. 1988. Exercise adherence: Its impact on public health. Human Kinetics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Peter W Dowrick. 1999. A review of self modeling and related interventions. Applied and Preventive Psychology 8, 1 (1999), 23--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Peter W Dowrick. 2012a. Self model theory: Learning from the future. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3, 2 (2012), 215--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Peter W Dowrick. 2012b. Self modeling: Expanding the theories of learning. Psychology in the Schools 49, 1 (2012), 30--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Peter W Dowrick and Simon J Biggs. 1983. Using video: Psychological and social applications. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Trevor Egli, Helen W Bland, Bridget F Melton, and Daniel R Czech. 2011. Influence of age, sex, and race on college students' exercise motivation of physical activity. Journal of American College Health 59, 5 (2011), 399--406.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Panteleimon Ekkekakis, Eric E Hall, and Steven J Petruzzello. 2008. The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified: to crack the 40-year-old nut, replace the 40-year-old nutcracker! Annals of Behavioral Medicine 35, 2 (2008), 136--149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Stefan Engeser. 2012. Advances in flow research. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Samantha Finkelstein, Andrea Nickel, Zachary Lipps, Tiffany Barnes, Zachary Wartell, and Evan A Suma. 2011. Astrojumper: Motivating exercise with an immersive virtual reality exergame. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 20, 1 (2011), 78--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Canadian Fitness and Lifestyle Research Institute. 2005. 2005 Physical Activity Monitor. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Diarmaid Fitzgerald, Nanthana Trakarnratanakul, Barry Smyth, and Brian Caulfield. 2010. Effects of a wobble board-based therapeutic exergaming system for balance training on dynamic postural stability and intrinsic motivation levels. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 40, 1 (2010), 11--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2008. US Department of Health and Human Services Physical activity guidelines for Americans 2008. (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ian M Franks and LJ Maile. 1991. The use of video in sport skill acquisition. Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences (1991), 231--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Christina M Frederick and Richard M Ryan. 1993. Differences in motivation for sport and exercise and their relations with participation and mental health. Journal of Sport Behavior 16, 3 (1993), 124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin J Gibala, Jenna B Gillen, and Michael E Percival. 2014. Physiological and health-related adaptations to low-volume interval training: influences of nutrition and sex. Sports Medicine 44, 2 (2014), 127--137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Martin J Gibala, Jonathan P Little, Maureen J MacDonald, and John A Hawley. 2012. Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease. Journal of Physiology 590, 5 (2012), 1077--1084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Martin J Gibala and Sean L McGee. 2008. Metabolic adaptations to short-term high-intensity interval training: a little pain for a lot of gain? Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 36, 2 (2008), 58--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Benoît R Gonzales, Vincent Hagin, Peter W Dowrick, and Alain Groslambert. 2015. Effects of Various Cognitive Video Stimulations on the Measured Stamina of Runners. Sport Psychologist 29, 4 (2015), 335--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Bryan L Haddock, Sarah Jarvis, Nicholas R Klug, Tarah Gonzalez, Bryan Barsaga, Shannon R Siegel, and Linda D Wilkin. 2012. Measurement of energy expenditure while playing exergames at a self-selected intensity. Open Sports Sciences Journal 5 (2012), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Kristoffer Hagen, Konstantinos Chorianopoulos, Alf Inge Wang, Letizia Jaccheri, and Stian Weie. 2016. Gameplay as exercise. In Proc. CHI Extended Abstracts. ACM, 1872--1878. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Maria Hagströmer, Pekka Oja, and Michael Sjöström. 2006. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ): a study of concurrent and construct validity. Public Health Nutrition 9, 6 (2006), 755--762.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proc. AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, Vol. 4. 1722.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Wijnand Ijsselsteijn, Yvonne De Kort, Ronald Bonants, Marco De Jager, and Joyce Westerink. 2004. Virtual Cycling: Effects of immersion and a virtual coach on motivation and presence in a home fitness application. In Proc. Virtual Reality Design and Evaluation Workshop. 22--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Omri Inbar, Oded Bar-Or, and James S Skinner. 1996. The Wingate anaerobic test. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Charlene Jennett, Anna L Cox, Paul Cairns, Samira Dhoparee, Andrew Epps, Tim Tijs, and Alison Walton. 2008. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66, 9 (2008), 641--661. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. James H Johnson and Donald S Siegel. 1992. Effects of association and dissociation on effort perception. Journal of Sport Behavior 15, 2 (1992), 119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Hollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, Craig A Bridge, Dave Marchant, Adrian W Midgley, Dominic Micklewright, and Lars R Mc Naughton. 2013. Physiological and psychological effects of deception on pacing strategy and performance: a review. Sports Medicine 43, 12 (2013), 1243--1257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Hollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, David Marchant, S Andy Sparks, Craig A Bridge, Adrian W Midgley, and Lars R Mc Naughton. 2016a. Improvements in cycling time trial performance are not sustained following the acute provision of challenging and deceptive feedback. Frontiers in Physiology 7 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Hollie S Jones, Emily L Williams, David C Marchant, S Andy Sparks, Craig A Bridge, Adrian W Midgley, and Lars R Mc Naughton. 2016b. Deception has no acute or residual effect on cycling time trial performance but negatively effects perceptual responses. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 19, 9 (2016), 771--776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Mary E Jung, Jessica E Bourne, and Jonathan P Little. 2014. Where does HIT fit? An examination of the affective response to high-intensity intervals in comparison to continuous moderate-and continuous vigorous-intensity exercise in the exercise intensity-affect continuum. PLoS One 9, 12 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Mallory Ketcheson, Zi Ye, and TC Graham. 2015. Designing for exertion: how heart-rate power-ups increase physical activity in exergames. In Proc. Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 79--89. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Jonna Koivisto and Juho Hamari. 2014. Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior 35 (2014), 179--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Paul B Laursen and David G Jenkins. 2002. The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training. Sports Medicine 32, 1 (2002), 53--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. I-Min Lee, Eric J Shiroma, Felipe Lobelo, Pekka Puska, Steven N Blair, Peter T Katzmarzyk, Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group, and others. 2012. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 380, 9838 (2012), 219--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Emmanuel Lesaffre. 2008. Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials. Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 66, 2 (2008), 150--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Andrew Macvean and Judy Robertson. 2013. Understanding exergame users' physical activity, motivation and behavior over time. In Proc. CHI. ACM, 1251--1260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Tímea Magyaródi, Henriett Nagy, Péter Soltész, Tamás Mózes, and Attila Oláh. 2013. Psychometric properties of a newly established flow state questionnaire. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being 1, 2 (2013), 85--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Peter J Maud and Barry B Shultz. 1986. Gender comparisons in anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity tests. British Journal of Sports Medicine 20, 2 (1986), 51--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Edward McAuley, Terry Duncan, and Vance V Tammen. 1989. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 60, 1 (1989), 48--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Elisa D Mekler, Florian Brühlmann, Alexandre N Tuch, and Klaus Opwis. 2015. Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Richard S Metcalfe, John A Babraj, Samantha G Fawkner, and Niels BJ Vollaard. 2012. Towards the minimal amount of exercise for improving metabolic health: beneficial effects of reduced-exertion high-intensity interval training. European Journal of Applied Physiology 112, 7 (2012), 2767--2775.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Trine Moholdt, Stian Weie, Konstantinos Chorianopoulos, Alf Inge Wang, and Kristoffer Hagen. 2017. Exergaming can be an innovative way of enjoyable high-intensity interval training. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine 3, 1 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Javier Monedero, Elizabeth J Lyons, and Donal J O'Gorman. 2015. Interactive video game cycling leads to higher energy expenditure and is more enjoyable than conventional exercise in adults. PloS One 10, 3 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Muriel Niederle and Lise Vesterlund. 2007. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, 3 (2007), 1067--1101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Stephen R Norris and Stewart R Petersen. 1998. Effects of endurance training on transient oxygen uptake responses in cyclists. Journal of Sports Sciences 16, 8 (1998), 733--738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2013. Healthy people 2010: Final review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. American College of Sports Medicine. 2017. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Stephen Olejnik, James Algina, and others. 2003. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods 8, 4 (2003), 434--447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Bruno RR Oliveira, Fabian A Slama, Andrea C Deslandes, Elen S Furtado, and Tony M Santos. 2013. Continuous and high-intensity interval training: which promotes higher pleasure? PLoS One 8, 11 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Wei Peng, Jih-Hsuan Lin, and Julia Crouse. 2011. Is playing exergames really exercising? A meta-analysis of energy expenditure in active video games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 14, 11 (2011), 681--688.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Rachel M Perron, Courtney A Graham, Jamie R Feldman, Rebecca A Moffett, and Eric E Hall. 2011. Do exergames allow children to achieve physical activity intensity commensurate with national guidelines? International Journal of Exercise Science 4, 4 (2011), 257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Johnmarshall Reeve and Edward L Deci. 1996. Elements of the competitive situation that affect intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 22, 1 (1996), 24--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Ann Reinthal, Kathy Szirony, Cindy Clark, Jeffrey Swiers, Michelle Kellicker, and Susan Linder. 2012. ENGAGE: guided activity-based gaming in neurorehabilitation after stroke: a pilot study. Stroke Research and Treatment 2012 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Richard M Ryan. 1982. Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, 3 (1982), 450--461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 1 (2000), 54--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Richard M Ryan, Christina M Frederick, Deborah Lepes, Noel Rubio, and Kennon M Sheldon. 1997. Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. International Journal of Sport Psychology 28, 4 (1997), 335--354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Jennifer Schumi and Janet T Wittes. 2011. Through the looking glass: understanding non-inferiority. Trials 12, 1 (2011), 106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Lindsay A Shaw, Jude Buckley, Paul M Corballis, Christof Lutteroth, and Burkhard C Wünsche. 2016. Competition and cooperation with virtual players in an exergame. PeerJ Computer Science 2 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Lindsay A Shaw, Burkhard C Wünsche, Christof Lutteroth, Stefan Marks, Jude Buckley, and Paul Corballis. 2015b. Development and Evaluation of an Exercycle Game Using Immersive Technologies. In Proc. Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management (HIKM). Australian Computer Society, 75--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Lindsay A Shaw, Burkhard C Wünsche, Christof Lutteroth, Stefan Marks, and Rodolphe Callies. 2015a. Challenges in Virtual Reality Exergame Design. In Proc. Australasian User Interface Conference (AUIC). Australian Computer Society, 61--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Ren-Jay Shei, Emily M Adamic, John S Raglin, Kevin G Thompson, and Timothy D Mickleborough. 2017. Commentary: Improvements in Cycling Time Trial Performance Are Not Sustained Following the Acute Provision of Challenging and Deceptive Feedback. Frontiers in Physiology 8 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Jeff Sinclair, Philip Hingston, and Martin Masek. 2009. Exergame development using the dual flow model. In Proc. Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Joanna Starek and Penny McCullagh. 1999. The effect of self-modeling on the performance of beginning swimmers. Sport Psychologist 13, 3 (1999), 269--287.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Kylie A Steel, Roger D Adams, Susan E Coulson, Colleen G Canning, and Holly J Hawtin. 2013. Video self-model training of punt kicking. International Journal of Sport and Health Science 11 (2013), 49--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Jeroen Swart, Robert Patrick Lamberts, Michael Ian Lambert, Estelle Vicki Lambert, Richard William Woolrich, Susan Johnston, and Timothy David Noakes. 2009. Exercising with reserve: exercise regulation by perceived exertion in relation to duration of exercise and knowledge of endpoint. British Journal of Sports Medicine 43, 10 (2009), 775--781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  82. Scott Thomas, Jeff Reading, and Roy J Shephard. 1992. Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences (1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Jacob S Thum, Gregory Parsons, Taylor Whittle, and Todd A Astorino. 2017. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PloS One 12, 1 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Jill Tracey. 2011. Benefits and usefulness of a personal motivation video: A case study of a professional mountain bike racer. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 23, 3 (2011), 308--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Kelly A Vertes and Diane M Ste-Marie. 2013. Trampolinists' self-controlled use of a feedforward self-modeling video in competition. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 25, 4 (2013), 463--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. Emily L Williams, Hollie S Jones, S Andy Sparks, David C Marchant, Adrian W Midgley, and Lars R Mc Naughton. 2015. Competitor presence reduces internal attentional focus and improves 16.1 km cycling time trial performance. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 18, 4 (2015), 486--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. Gareth Williams and Gema Frühbeck. 2009. Obesity: Science to practice. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. Soojeong Yoo, Tristan Heywood, Lie Ming Tang, Bob Kummerfeld, and Judy Kay. 2017. Towards a Long Term Model of Virtual Reality Exergame Exertion. In Proc. Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, 247--255. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Sue Ziebland, Margaret Thorogood, Pat Yudkin, Lesley Jones, and Angela Coulter. 1998. Lack of willpower or lack of wherewithal? "Internal" and "external" barriers to changing diet and exercise in a three year follow-up of participants in a health check. Social Science & Medicine 46, 4--5 (1998), 461--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Interactive Feedforward for Improving Performance and Maintaining Intrinsic Motivation in VR Exergaming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader