skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174062acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Exploring Accessible Smartwatch Interactions for People with Upper Body Motor Impairments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smartwatches are always-available, provide quick access to information in a mobile setting, and can collect continuous health and fitness data. However, the small interaction space of these wearables may pose challenges for people with upper body motor impairments. To investigate accessible smartwatch interactions for this user group, we conducted two studies. First, we assessed the accessibility of existing smartwatch gestures with 10 participants with motor impairments. We found that not all participants were able to complete button, swipe and tap interactions. In a second study, we adopted a participatory approach to explore smartwatch gesture preferences and to gain insight into alternative, more accessible smartwatch interaction techniques. Eleven participants with motor impairments created gestures for 16 common smartwatch actions on both touchscreen and non-touchscreen (bezel, wristband) areas of the watch and the user's body. We present results from both studies and provide design recommendations.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn3983.mp4

mp4

310.5 MB

References

  1. Youngseok Ahn, Sungjae Hwang, HyunGook Yoon, Junghyeon Gim, and Jung-hee Ryu. 2015. BandSense: Pressure-sensitive Multi-touch Interaction on a Wristband. Proc. CHI EA '15, 251--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lisa Anthony, YooJin Kim, and Leah Findlater. 2013. Analyzing user-generated youtube videos to understand touchscreen use by people with motor impairments. Proc. CHI '13, 1223--1232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Apple. Human Interface Guidelines. Retrieved September 19, 2017 from https://developer.apple.com/watchos/human-interface-guidelines/interface-elements/buttons/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shaikh Shawon Arefin Shimon, Courtney Lutton, Zichun Xu, Sarah Morrison-Smith, Christina Boucher, and Jaime Ruiz. 2016. Exploring Non-touchscreen Gestures for Smartwatches. Proc. CHI '16, 3822--3833. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Daniel L. Ashbrook, James R. Clawson, Kent Lyons, Thad E. Starner, and Nirmal Patel. 2008. Quickdraw: the impact of mobility and on-body placement on device access time. Proc. CHI '08, 219--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Patrick Carrington, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2014. Wearables and chairables: inclusive design of mobile input and output techniques for power wheelchair users. Proc. CHI '14, 3103--3112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Patrick Carrington, Amy Hurst, and Shaun K. Kane. 2014. The Gest-Rest?: A Pressure-Sensitive Chairable Input Pad for Power Wheelchair Armrests. Proc. ASSETS '14, 201--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Victor Dibia. 2016. FOQUS: A Smartwatch Application for Individuals with ADHD and Mental Health Challenges. Proc. ASSETS '16, 311--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Victor Dibia, Shari Trewin, Maryam Ashoori, et al. 2015. Exploring the Potential of Wearables to Support Employment for People with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Proc. ASSETS '15, 401--402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tanja Döring, Dagmar Kern, Paul Marshall, et al. 2011. Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand. Proc. CHI '11, 483--492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. N. Duff, C. B. Irwin, J. L. Skye, M. E. Sesto, et al. 2010. The Effect of Disability and Approach on Touch Screen Performance during a Number Entry Task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 54, 6: 566--570.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Leah Findlater, Karyn Moffatt, Jon Froehlich, Meethu Malu, and Joan Zhang. 2017. Comparing Touchscreen and Mouse Input Performance by People With and Without Upper Body Motor Impairments. Proc. CHI '17, 6056--6061. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jon Froehlich, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Shaun K. Kane. 2007. Barrier pointing: using physical edges to assist target acquisition on mobile device touch screens. Proc. ASSETS '07, 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Markus Funk, Alireza Sahami, Niels Henze, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2014. Using a touch-sensitive wristband for text entry on smart watches. Proc. CHI EA '14, 2305--2310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jun Gong, Xing-Dong Yang, and Pourang Irani. 2016. WristWhirl: One-handed Continuous Smartwatch Input using Wrist Gestures. Proc.UIST '16, 861--872. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tiago João Vieira Guerreiro, Hugo Nicolau, Joaquim Jorge, et al. 2010. Assessing mobile touch interfaces for tetraplegics. Proc. MobileHCI '10, 31--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Anhong Guo and Tim Paek. 2016. Exploring tilt for no-touch, wrist-only interactions on smartwatches. Proc. MobileHCI '16, 17--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Chris Harrison and Scott E. Hudson. 2009. Abracadabra: wireless, high-precision, and unpowered finger input for very small mobile devices. Proc. UIST '09, 121--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Xueliang Huo, Hangue Park, and Maysam Ghovanloo. 2012. Dual-mode tongue drive system: using speech and tongue motion to improve computer access for people with disabilities. Proc. WH '12, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Curt B. Irwin and Mary E. Sesto. 2012. Performance and touch characteristics of disabled and non-disabled participants during a reciprocal tapping task using touch screen technology. Applied Ergonomics 43, 6: 1038--1043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Shaun K. Kane, Chandrika Jayant, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2009. Freedom to roam: a study of mobile device adoption and accessibility for people with visual and motor disabilities. Proc. ASSETS '09, 115--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shaun K. Kane, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Richard E. Ladner. 2011. Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance. Proc. CHI '11, 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Frederic Kerber, Tobias Kiefer, and Markus Löchtefeld. 2016. Investigating Interaction Techniques for State-of-the-Art Smartwatches. Proc. CHI EA '16, 2540--2547. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Christian Kray, Daniel Nesbitt, John Dawson, and Michael Rohs. 2010. User-defined gestures for connecting mobile phones, public displays, and tabletops. Proc. MobileHCI '10, 239--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Meethu Malu and Leah Findlater. 2015. Personalized, Wearable Control of a Head-mounted Display for Users with Upper Body Motor Impairments. Proc. CHI '15, 221--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. V Mathiowetz, G Volland, N Kashman, and K Weber. 1985. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. The American journal of occupational therapy, 6: 386--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Matthias Mielke and Rainer Brück. 2015. A Pilot Study about the Smartwatch as Assistive Device for Deaf People. Proc. ASSETS '15, 301--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kyle Montague, Hugo Nicolau, and Vicki L. Hanson. 2014. Motor-impaired touchscreen interactions in the wild. Proc. ASSETS '14, 123--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Maia Naftali and Leah Findlater. 2014. Accessibility in context: understanding the truly mobile experience of smartphone users with motor impairments. Proc. ASSETS '14, 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jerome Pasquero, Scott J. Stobbe, and Noel Stonehouse. 2011. A haptic wristwatch for eyes-free interactions. Proc. CHI '11, 3257--3266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lorenzo Porzi, Stefano Messelodi, Carla Mara Modena, and Elisa Ricci. 2013. A smart watch-based gesture recognition system for assisting people with visual impairments. Proc. IMMPD '13, 19--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. R. Raya, J.O. Roa, E. Rocon, R. Ceres, and J.L. Pons. 2010. Wearable inertial mouse for children with physical and cognitive impairments. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 162, 2: 248--259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Steven Schirra and Frank R. Bentley. 2015. "It's kind of like an extra screen for my phone": Understanding Everyday Uses of Consumer Smart Watches. Proc. CHI EA '15, 2151--2156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Shari Trewin, Cal Swart, and Donna Pettick. 2013. Physical accessibility of touchscreen smartphones. Proc. ASSETS '13, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Chat Wacharamanotham, Jan Hurtmanns, Alexander Mertens, Martin Kronenbuerger, Christopher Schlick, and Jan Borchers. 2011. Evaluating swabbing: a touchscreen input method for elderly users with tremor. Proc. CHI '11, 623--626. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2009. User-defined gestures for surface computing. Proc. CHI '09, 1083--1092. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jacob O. Wobbrock, Brad A. Myers, and John A. Kembel. 2003. EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion. Proc. UIST '03, 61--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Robert Xiao, Gierad Laput, and Chris Harrison. 2014. Expanding the input expressivity of smartwatches with mechanical pan, twist, tilt and click. Proc. CHI '14, 193--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Huiyu Zhou and Huosheng Hu. 2008. Human motion tracking for rehabilitation-A survey. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 3, 1: 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Accessible Smartwatch Interactions for People with Upper Body Motor Impairments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2018
        8489 pages
        ISBN:9781450356206
        DOI:10.1145/3173574

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 April 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader