skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174067acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Unpacking Perceptions of Data-Driven Inferences Underlying Online Targeting and Personalization

Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Much of what a user sees browsing the internet, from ads to search results, is targeted or personalized by algorithms that have made inferences about that user. Prior work has documented that users find such targeting simultaneously useful and creepy. We begin unpacking these conflicted feelings through two online studies. In the first study, 306 participants saw one of ten explanations for why they received an ad, reflecting prevalent methods of targeting based on demographics, interests, and other factors. The type of interest-based targeting described in the explanation affected participants' comfort with the targeting and perceptions of its usefulness. We conducted a follow-up study in which 237 participants saw ten interests companies might infer. Both the sensitivity of the interest category and participants' actual interest in that topic significantly impacted their attitudes toward inferencing. Our results inform the design of transparency tools.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn4034-file5.mp4

mp4

5.2 MB

References

  1. Gunes Acar, Marc Juarez, Nick Nikiforakis, Claudia Diaz, Seda G¨ urses, Frank Piessens, and Bart Preneel. 2013. FPDetective: Dusting the web for fingerprinters. In Proc. CCS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lalit Agarwal, Nisheeth Shrivastava, Sharad Jaiswal, and Saurabh Panjwani. 2013. Do not embarrass: Re-examining user concerns for online tracking and advertising. In Proc. SOUPS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Julia Angwin, Madeleine Varner, and Ariana Tobin. September 14, 2017. Facebook Enabled Advertisers to Reach 'Jew Haters'. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/facebookenabled-advertisers-to-reach-jew-haters.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Rebecca Balebako, Pedro Leon, Richard Shay, Blase Ur, Yang Wang, and L. Cranor. 2012. Measuring the effectiveness of privacy tools for limiting behavioral advertising. In Proc. W2SP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Farah Chanchary, Yomna Abdelaziz, and Sonia Chiasson. April 22, 2017. Privacy Concerns Amidst OBA and the Need for Alternative Models. To appear in IEEE Internet Computing. http://chorus.scs.carleton.ca/wp/wp-content/ papercite-data/pdf/chanchary2017sharing-ic.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cliqz. Ghostery. Retrieved September 2017 from http://www.ghostery.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rena Coen, Emily Paul, Pavel Vanegas, Alethea Lange, and G.S. Hans. 2016. A User-Centered Perspective on Algorithmic Personalization. University of California, Berkeley MIMS Final Project. https://www.ischool. berkeley.edu/projects/2016/user-centeredperspective-algorithmic-personalization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Amit Datta, Michael Carl Tschantz, and Anupam Datta. 2015. Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. PoPETS 1 (2015), 92--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ECUAD. Visualizing Lightbeam. Retrieved September 2017 from http://research.ecuad.ca/lightbeamGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. EFF. Privacy Badger. Retrieved September 2017 from http://www.eff.org/privacybadgerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Steven Englehardt and Arvind Narayanan. 2016. Online Tracking: A 1-million-site Measurement and Analysis. In Proc. CCS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Steven Englehardt, Dillon Reisman, Christian Eubank, Peter Zimmerman, Jonathan Mayer, Arvind Narayanan, and Edward W. Felten. 2015. Cookies that give you away: The surveillance implications of web tracking. In Proc. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I like it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Motahhare Eslami, Aimee Rickman, Kristen Vaccaro, Amirhossein Aleyasen, Andy Vuong, Karrie Karahalios, Kevin Hamilton, and Christian Sandvig. 2015. "I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to {her}": Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. In Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Facebook. Your ad preferences. Retrieved September 2017 from https://www.facebook.com/ads/ preferences/?entry_product=ad_settings_screenGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Google. Ad settings. Retrieved September 2017 from https://adssettings.google.com/authenticatedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Google. Add multiple topics with topic codes. Retrieved September 2017 from https://support.google.com/ adwords/answer/156178?authuser=0#topic_codesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Google. Advertising Policies Help. Retrieved September 2017 from https://support.google.com/ adwordspolicy/answer/143465Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Google. Topics used for personalized ads. Retrieved September 2017 from https: //support.google.com/ads/answer/2842480?hl=enGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Kashmir Hill. February 16, 2012. How Target figured out a teen girl was pregnant before her father did. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2012/ 02/16/how-target-figured-out-a-teen-girl-waspregnant-before-her-father-did/#2caffa3a34c6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Alex Kantrowitz. September 15, 2017. Google Allowed Advertisers To Target People Searching Racist Phrases. BuzzFeed. https://www.buzzfeed.com/alexkantrowitz/googleallowed-advertisers-to-target-jewish-parasiteblack.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Balachander Krishnamurthy, Delfina Malandrino, and Craig E. Wills. 2007. Measuring Privacy Loss and the Impact of Privacy Protection in Web Browsing. In Proc. SOUPS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Balachander Krishnamurthy and Craig Wills. 2009. Privacy Diffusion on the Web: A Longitudinal Perspective. In Proc. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Mathias Lecuyer, Guillaume Ducoffe, Francis Lan, Andrei Papancea, Theofilos Petsios, Riley Spahn, Augustin Chaintreau, and Roxana Geambasu. 2014. XRay: Enhancing the Web's Transparency with Differential Correlation. In Proc. USENIX Security. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mathias Lecuyer, Riley Spahn, Yannis Spiliopolous, Augustin Chaintreau, Roxana Geambasu, and Daniel Hsu. 2015. Sunlight: Fine-grained Targeting Detection at Scale with Statistical Confidence. In Proc. CCS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pedro Leon, Blase Ur, Richard Shay, Yang Wang, Rebecca Balebako, and Lorrie Cranor. 2012. Why Johnny can't opt out: A usability evaluation of tools to limit online behavioral advertising. In Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pedro G. Leon, Blase Ur, Yang Wang, Manya Sleeper, Rebecca Balebako, Richard Shay, Lujo Bauer, Mihai Christodorescu, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2013. What Matters to Users? Factors that Affect Users' Willingness to Share Information with Online Advertisers. In Proc. SOUPS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Adam Lerner, Anna Kornfeld Simpson, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Franziska Roesner. 2016. Internet Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Trackers: An Archaeological Study of Web Tracking from 1996 to 2016. In Proc. USENIX Security.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Aleksandar Matic, Martin Pielot, and Nuria Oliver. 2017. "OMG! How did it know that?": Reactions to Highly-Personalized Ads. In Proc. UMAP. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jonathan R. Mayer and John C. Mitchell. 2012. Third-party web tracking: Policy and technology. In Proc. IEEE S&P. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Aleecia M. McDonald and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2010. Americans' Attitudes About Internet Behavioral Advertising Practices. In Proc. WPES. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. William Melicher, Mahmood Sharif, Joshua Tan, Lujo Bauer, Mihai Christodorescu, and Pedro Giovanni Leon. 2016. (Do Not) Track Me Sometimes: Users Contextual Preferences for Web Tracking. PoPETS 2 (2016), 135--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Mozilla. Lightbeam. Retrieved September 2017 from http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/lightbeam/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Oracle. Oracle Data Cloud Registry. Retrieved September 2017 from http://www.bluekai.com/registry/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Javier Parra-Arnau, Jagdish Prasad Achara, and Claude Castelluccia. 2017. MyAdChoices: Bringing transparency and control to online advertising. ACM TWEB 11, 1 (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Angelisa C. Plane, Elissa M. Redmiles, Michelle M. Mazurek, and Michael Carl Tschantz. 2017. Exploring User Perceptions of Discrimination in Online Targeted Advertising. In Proc. USENIX Security.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Emilee Rader and Rebecca Gray. 2015. Understanding user beliefs about algorithmic curation in the Facebook news feed. In Proc. CHI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno, and David Wetherall. 2012. Detecting and Defending Against Third-party Tracking on the Web. In Proc. NSDI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sonam Samat, Alessandro Acquisti, and Linda Babcock. 2017. Raise the Curtains: The Effect of Awareness About Targeting on Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions. In Proc. SOUPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Florian Schaub, Aditya Marella, Pranshu Kalvani, Blase Ur, Chao Pan, Emily Forney, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2016. Watching Them Watching Me: Browser Extensions' Impact on User Privacy Awareness and Concern. In Proc. USEC.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Christopher A. Summers, Robert W. Smith, and Rebecca Walker Reczek. 2016. An Audience of One: Behaviorally Targeted Ads as Implied Social Labels. Journal of Consumer Research 43 (June 2016), 156--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Latanya Sweeney. 2013. Discrimination in online ad delivery. CACM 56, 5 (2013), 44--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Omer Tene and Jules Polonetsky. 2014. A Theory of Creepy: Technology, Privacy, and Shifting Social Norms. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 16, 1 (2014), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Florian Tramer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu, Jean-Pierre Hubaux, Mathias Humbert, Ari Juels, and Huang Lin. 2017. FairTest: Discovering unwarranted associations in data-driven applications. In Proc. EuroS&P.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Joseph Turow, Jennifer King, Chris Jay Hoofnagle, Amy Bleakley, and Michael Hennessy. 2009. Americans Reject Tailored Advertising and Three Activities that Enable It. SSRN (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Blase Ur, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Richard Shay, and Yang Wang. 2012. Smart, useful, scary, creepy: Perceptions of online behavioral advertising. In Proc. SOUPS. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jeffrey Warshaw, Nina Taft, and Allison Woodruff. 2016. Intuitions, Analytics, and Killing Ants: Inference Literacy of High School-educated Adults in the US. In Proc. SOUPS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Craig E. Wills and Can Tatar. 2012. Understanding what they do with what they know. In Proc. WPES. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Yaxing Yao, Davide Lo Re, and Yang Wang. 2017. Folk Models of Online Behavioral Advertising. In Proc. CCSW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Zhonghao Yu, Sam Macbeth, Konark Modi, and Josep M. Pujol. 2016. Tracking the Trackers. In Proc. WWW. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Unpacking Perceptions of Data-Driven Inferences Underlying Online Targeting and Personalization

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader