skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3174152acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Playing with Streakiness in Online Games: How Players Perceive and React to Winning and Losing Streaks in League of Legends

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Streakiness refers to observed tendency towards consecutive appearances of particular patterns. In video games, streakiness is oftentimes inevitable, where a player keeps winning or losing for a short period. However, the phenomenon remains understudied in present online game research. How do players perceive streakiness? How does it impact player experience (PX)? How should streakiness be taken into consideration for the design of PX? In this paper, we address these questions through a qualitative study of player discussions about streakiness in League of Legends. We found that players developed various ways to describe a streak. Both winning and losing streaks negatively impacted PX. Players devised numerous strategies to manage streakiness, among which disengagement was a primary means. We analyze streakiness as a social construct through which players coped with complex game systems. We discuss design implications for managing streakiness in online games.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

pn4527.mp4

mp4

267.3 MB

References

  1. Jim Albert. 2004. Streakiness in Team Performance. CHANCE 17, 3: 37--43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jim Albert and Jay Bennett. 2003. Curve ball?: baseball, statistics, and the role of chance in the game. Copernicus Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmer Arif, John J. Robinson, Stephanie A. Stanek, Elodie S. Fichet, Paul Townsend, Zena Worku, and Kate Starbird. 2017. A Closer Look at the Self-Correcting Crowd: Examining Corrections in Online Rumors. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 155--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Peter Ayton and Ilan Fischer. 2004. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler's fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory&Cognition 32, 8: 1369--1378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael Bar-Eli, Simcha Avugos, and Markus Raab. 2006. Twenty years of "hot hand" research: Review and critique. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 7, 6: 525--553.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jared L. Bleak and Christina M. Frederick. 1998. Supersititious Behavior in Sport: Levels of Effectiveness and Determinants of Use in Three Collegiate Sports. Journal of Sport Behavior 21, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gifford W. Bradley. 1978. Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, 1: 56--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kurt A. Carlson and Suzanne B. Shu. 2007. The rule of three: How the third event signals the emergence of a streak. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104, 1: 113--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Trevor I. Case, Julie Fitness, David R. Cairns, and Richard J. Stevenson. 2004. Coping With Uncertainty: Superstitious Strategies and Secondary Control1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34, 4: 848--871.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Dongseong Choi and Jinwoo Kim. 2004. Why People Continue to Play Online Games: In Search of Critical Design Factors to Increase Customer Loyalty to Online Contents. CyberPsychology&Behavior 7, 1: 11--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Trina Choontanom and Bonnie Nardi. 2012. Theorycrafting: The Art and Science of Using Numbers to Interpret the World. In Games, Learning, and Society: Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age. Cambridge University Press, London, 185--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Colin F. Camerer. 1989. Does the Basketball Market Believe in the 'Hot Hand,'? The American Economic Review 79, 5: 1257--1261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Robert A. Connolly and Richard J. Rendleman. 2008. Skill, Luck, and Streaky Play on the PGA Tour. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103, 481: 74--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Clara Crivellaro, Rob Comber, John Bowers, Peter C. Wright, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. A pool of dreams: facebook, politics and the emergence of a social movement. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, 3573--3582. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Lee Crust and Mark Nesti. 2006. A Review of Psychological Momentum in Sports: Why qualitative research is needed. The Online Journal of Sport Psychology 8, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Peter Csapo, Simcha Avugos, Markus Raab, and Michael Bar-Eli. 2015. The effect of perceived streakiness on the shot-taking behaviour of basketball players. European Journal of Sport Science 15, 7: 647--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Lori F. Cummins, Michael R. Nadorff, and Anita E. Kelly. 2009. Winning and positive affect can lead to reckless gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 23, 2: 287--294.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Thomas Debeauvais, Bonnie Nardi, Diane J. Schiano, Nicolas Ducheneaut, and Nicholas Yee. 2011. If you build it they might stay: retention mechanisms in World of Warcraft. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games - FDG '11, 180--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ansgar E. Depping and Regan L. Mandryk. 2017. Why is This Happening to Me?: How Player Attribution can Broaden our Understanding of Player Experience. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 1040--1052. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jill P. Dimond, Michaelanne Dye, Daphne Larose, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2013. Hollaback!: the role of storytelling online in a social movement organization. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '13, 477--489. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Scott Donaldson. 2015. Mechanics and Metagame: Exploring Binary Expertise in League of Legends. Games and Culture: 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios, Christian Sandvig, Kristen Vaccaro, Aimee Rickman, Kevin Hamilton, and Alex Kirlik. 2016. First I "like" it, then I hide it: Folk Theories of Social Feeds. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 2371--2382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Motahhare Eslami, Kristen Vaccaro, Karrrie Karahalios, and Kevin Hamilton. 2017. "Be careful; things can be worse than they appear": Understanding Biased Algorithms and Users' Behavior around Them in Rating Platforms. In ICWSM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Batya Friedman and Helen Nissenbaum. 1996. Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 14, 3: 330--347. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Riot Games. 2017. Matchmaking Guide. support.riotgames.com. Retrieved from https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752954-Matchmaking-GuideGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Thomas Gilovich, Robert Vallone, and Amos Tversky. 1985. The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology 17, 3: 295--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Brett Green and Jeffrey Zwiebel. 2016. The Hot-Hand Fallacy: Cognitive Mistakes or Equilibrium Adjustments? Evidence from Major League Baseball. In Sports Analytics Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mark D. Griffiths and Carolyn Bingham. 2005. A study of superstitious beliefs among bingo players. Journal of Gambling Issues 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Kevin A. Hallgren. 2012. Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data: An Overview and Tutorial. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology 8, 1: 23--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The three paradigms of HCI. alt.chi.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Nerilee Hing, Louise Holdsworth, Margaret Tiyce, and Helen Breen. 2014. Stigma and problem gambling: current knowledge and future research directions. International Gambling Studies 14, 1: 64--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Shang H Hsu, Ming C Chuang, and Chien C Chang. 2000. A semantic differential study of designers' and users' product form perception. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 25, 4: 375--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Robin Hunicke. 2005. The case for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology - ACE '05, 429--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ioanna Iacovides, Anna L. Cox, Patrick McAndrew, James Aczel, and Eileen Scanlon. 2015. Game-Play Breakdowns and Breakthroughs: Exploring the Relationship Between Action, Understanding, and Involvement. Human--Computer Interaction 30, 3--4: 202--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Daniel Johnson, Lennart E. Nacke, and Peta Wyeth. 2015. All about that Base: Differing Player Experiences in Video Game Genres and the Unique Case of MOBA Games. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 2265--2274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Faltin Karlsen. 2011. Theorycrafting: from collective intelligence to intrinsic satisfaction. In DiGRA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Brian L. Keeley. 1999. Of Conspiracy Theories. The Journal of Philosophy 96, 3: 109--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Jooyeon Kim, Brian C. Keegan, Sungjoon Park, and Alice Oh. 2016. The Proficiency-Congruency Dilemma: Virtual Team Design and Performance in Multiplayer Online Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 4351--4365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Suck Won Kim and Jon E Grant. 2001. Personality dimensions in pathological gambling disorder and obsessive--compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research 104, 3: 205--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Young Ji Kim, David Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Jeffrey Yu-Ting Lin, Naomi McArthur, and Thomas W. Malone. 2017. What Makes a Strong Team?: Using Collective Intelligence to Predict Team Performance in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 2316--2329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Yubo Kou and Xinning Gui. 2014. Playing with strangers: understanding temporary teams in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play - CHI PLAY '14, 161--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Yubo Kou, Xinning Gui, and Yong Ming Kow. 2016. Ranking Practices and Distinction in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY '16, 4--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Yubo Kou and Bonnie Nardi. 2013. Regulating Anti-Social Behavior on the Internet: The Example of League of Legends. In iConference 2013 Proceedings, 616--622.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Klaus Krippendorff. 1980. Content analysis?: an introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Juhi Kulshrestha, Motahhare Eslami, Johnnatan Messias, Muhammad Bilal Zafar, Saptarshi Ghosh, Krishna P. Gummadi, and Karrie Karahalios. 2017. Quantifying Search Bias: Investigating Sources of Bias for Political Searches in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17, 417--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Alex Leavitt, Brian C. Keegan, and Joshua Clark. 2016. Ping to Win?: Non-Verbal Communication and Team Performance in Competitive Online Multiplayer Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 4337--4350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Jeroen S. Lemmens, Patti M. Valkenburg, and Jochen Peter. 2011. Psychosocial causes and consequences of pathological gaming. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1: 144--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Elisa D. Mekler, Julia Ayumi Bopp, Alexandre N. Tuch, Klaus Opwis, Elisa D. Mekler, Julia Ayumi Bopp, Alexandre N. Tuch, and Klaus Opwis. 2014. A systematic review of quantitative studies on the enjoyment of digital entertainment games. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '14, 927--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Megan A. Moreno, Natalie Goniu, Peter S. Moreno, and Douglas Diekema. 2013. Ethics of Social Media Research: Common Concerns and Practical Considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 16, 9: 708--713.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Lennart Nacke and Anders Drachen. 2011. Towards a Framework of Player Experience Research. In EPEX'2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Bonnie Nardi and Justin Harris. 2006. Strangers and friends: collaborative play in world of warcraft. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '06, 149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Christopher Paul. 2011. Optimizing Play: How Theorycraft Changes Gameplay and Design. Game Studies 11, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Serge Petralito, Florian Brühlmann, Glena Iten, Elisa D. Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2017. A Good Reason to Die: How Avatar Death and High Challenges Enable Positive Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 5087--5097. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Matt Porter. 2016. League of Legends Surpasses 100 Million Monthly Active Players. ign.com. Retrieved from http://www.ign.com/articles/2016/09/14/league-of-legends-surpasses-100-million-monthly-active-playersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Andrew K. Przybylski, C. Scott Rigby, and Richard M. Ryan. 2010. A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology 14, 2: 154--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Matthew J. Rockloff and Grant Schofield. 2004. Factor Analysis of Barriers to Treatment for Problem Gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies 20, 2: 121--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Paul Rogers. 1998. The Cognitive Psychology of Lottery Gambling: A Theoretical Review. Journal of Gambling Studies 14, 2: 111--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 1: 68--78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Phillip Shaver, Judith Schwartz, Donald Kirson, and Cary O'Connor. 1987. Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 6: 1061--1086.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Kenneth B. Shores, Yilin He, Kristina L. Swanenburg, Robert Kraut, and John Riedl. 2014. The identification of deviance and its impact on retention in a multiplayer game. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work&social computing - CSCW '14, 1356--1365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. C. Sire and S. Redner. 2008. Undestanding Baseball Team Standings and Streaks. The European Physical Journal B 67: 473--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Kate Starbird, Emma Spiro, Isabelle Edwards, Kaitlyn Zhou, Jim Maddock, and Sindhuja Narasimhan. 2016. Could This Be True?: I Think So! Expressed Uncertainty in Online Rumoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '16, 360--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Avrum Stroll. 1994. Moore and Wittgenstein on Certainty. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. April Tyack, Peta Wyeth, and Daniel Johnson. 2016. The Appeal of MOBA Games: What Makes People Start, Stay, and Stop. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play - CHI PLAY '16, 313--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Kellie Vella, Daniel Johnson, Vanessa Wan Sze Cheng, Tracey Davenport, Jo Mitchell, Madison Klarkowski, and Cody Phillips. 2017. A Sense of Belonging: Pokémon GO and Social Connectedness.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Karl E. Weick. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Alison Jing Xu, Rami Zwick, and Norbert Schwarz. 2012. Washing away your (good or bad) luck: Physical cleansing affects risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141, 1: 26--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Juemin Xu and Nigel Harvey. 2014. Carry on winning: The gamblers' fallacy creates hot hand effects in online gambling. Cognition 131, 2: 173--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Yan Xu, Xiang Cao, Abigail Sellen, Ralf Herbrich, and Thore Graepel. 2011. Sociable killers: Understanding Social Relationships in an Online First-person Shooter Game. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '11, 197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Shumaila Yousafzai, Zaheer Hussain, and Mark Griffiths. 2014. Social responsibility in online videogaming: What should the videogame industry do? Addiction Research&Theory 22, 3: 181--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Playing with Streakiness in Online Games: How Players Perceive and React to Winning and Losing Streaks in League of Legends

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader