ABSTRACT
This paper presents a model allowing inferences of perceivable screen content in relation to position and orientation of mobile or wearable devices with respect to their user. The model is based on findings from vision science and allows prediction of a value of effective resolution that can be perceived by a user. It considers distance and angle between the device and the eyes of the observer as well as the resulting retinal eccentricity when the device is not directly focused but observed in the periphery. To validate our model, we conducted a study with 12 participants. Based on our results, we outline implications for the design of mobile applications that are able to adapt themselves to facilitate information throughput and usability.
Supplemental Material
- Daniel L. Ashbrook, James R. Clawson, Kent Lyons, Thad E. Starner, and Nirmal Patel. 2008. Quickdraw: The Impact of Mobility and On-body Placement on Device Access Time. In Proc. CHI '08. 219--222. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Till Ballendat, Nicolai Marquardt, and Saul Greenberg. 2010. Proxemic Interaction: Designing for a Proximity and Orientation-Aware Environment. In Proc. ITS '10. ACM, 121--130. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dirk Bartz, Douglas Cunningham, Jan Fischer, and Christian Wallraven. 2008. The Role of Perception for Computer Graphics. Section 2 (2008).Google Scholar
- Stephen Butterworth. 1930. On the Theory of Filter Amplifiers. Wireless Engineer 7, 6 (1930), 536--541.Google Scholar
- CCS Insight. 2017. Forecast Reveals Steady Growth in Smartwatch Market. (16 Mar 2017). https://goo.gl/WDtoHF Last accessed 05/01/2018.Google Scholar
- Enrico Costanza, Samuel A. Inverso, Elan Pavlov, Rebecca Allen, and Pattie Maes. 2006. eye-q: Eyeglass Peripheral Display for Subtle Intimate Notifications. In Proc. MobileHCI '06. ACM, 211--218. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jakub Dostal, Uta Hinrichs, Per Ola Kristensson, and Aaron Quigley. 2014. SpiderEyes: Designing Attentionand Proximity-aware Collaborative Interfaces for Wall-sized Displays. In Proc. IUI '14. ACM, 143--152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew T. Duchowski, Nathan Cournia, and Hunter Murphy. 2004. Gaze-Contingent Displays: A Review. Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society 7, 6 (Dec. 2004), 621--34.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Farzin Farhadi-Niaki. 2010. A Review on Eye-Gaze Tracking, GCDs, and Implemented Foveated Imaging Systems Using Optimized Methods. Computers in Human Behavior (2010).Google Scholar
- Edward T. Hall. 1969. The Hidden Dimension. Anchor Books New York.Google Scholar
- Rebecca Hansson and Peter Ljungstrand. 2000. The Reminder Bracelet: Subtle Notification Cues for Mobile Devices. In Proc. CHI EA '00. ACM, 323--324. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Harrison, Brian Y. Lim, Aubrey Shick, and Scott E. Hudson. 2009. Where to Locate Wearable Displays?: Reaction Time Performance of Visual Alerts from Tip to Toe. In Proc. CHI '09. ACM, 941--944. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Randall T. Jose. 1983. Understanding Low Vision. American Foundation for the Blind.Google Scholar
- Harris R. Lieberman and Alex P. Pentland. 1982. Microcomputer-Based Estimation of Psychophysical Thresholds: The Best PEST. Behavior Research Methods 14, 1 (1982), 21--25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kris Luyten, Donald Degraen, Gustavo Rovelo Ruiz, Sven Coppers, and Davy Vanacken. 2016. Hidden in Plain Sight: An Exploration of a Visual Language for Near-Eye Out-of-Focus Displays in the Peripheral View. In Proc. CHI '16. ACM, 487--497. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kent Lyons, David Nguyen, Daniel Ashbrook, and Sean White. 2012. Facet: A Multi-segment Wrist Worn System. In Proc. UIST '12. ACM, 123--130. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blair MacIntyre, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Stephen Voida, Klaus M. Hansen, Joe Tullio, and Gregory M. Corso. 2001. Support for Multitasking and Background Awareness Using Interactive Peripheral Displays. In Proc. UIST '01. ACM, 41--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jennifer Mankoff, Anind K. Dey, Gary Hsieh, Julie Kientz, Scott Lederer, and Morgan Ames. 2003. Heuristic Evaluation of Ambient Displays. In Proc. CHI '03. ACM, 169--176. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tara Matthews, Anind K. Dey, Jennifer Mankoff, Scott Carter, and Tye Rattenbury. 2004. A Toolkit for Managing User Attention in Peripheral Displays. In Proc. UIST '04. ACM, 247--256. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. McLaren. 1976. The Development of the CIE 1976 (L*a*b*) Uniform Colour Space and Colour-Difference Formula. Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists 92, 9 (1976), 338--341.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miguel A. Nacenta, Satoshi Sakurai, Tokuo Yamaguchi, Yohei Miki, Yuichi Itoh, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Sriram Subramanian, and Carl Gutwin. 2007. E-conic: A Perspective-aware Interface for Multi-display Environments. In Proc. UIST '07. ACM, 279--288. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Toshikazu Ohshima, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, and Hideyuki Tamura. 1996. Gaze-Directed Adaptive Rendering for Interacting with Virtual Space. In Proc. VRAIS '96. IEEE Computer Society, 103--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jerome Pasquero, Scott J. Stobbe, and Noel Stonehouse. 2011. A Haptic Wristwatch for Eyes-free Interactions. In Proc. CHI '11. ACM, 3257--3266. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Pentland. 1980. Maximum Likelihood Estimation: The Best PEST. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 28, 4 (1980), 377--379.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henning Pohl and Roderick Murray-Smith. 2013. Focused and Casual Interactions: Allowing Users to Vary Their Level of Engagement. In Proc. CHI '13. ACM, 2223--2232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonathan S. Pointer. 2008. Recognition versus Resolution: A Comparison of Visual Acuity Results Using Two Alternative Test Chart Optotype. Journal of Optometry 1, 2 (2008), 65--70.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Reddy. 1997. Perceptually Modulated Level of Detail for Virtual Environments. (1997).Google Scholar
- Martin Reddy. 2001. Perceptually Optimized 3D Graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 21, 5 (2001), 68--75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eyal M. Reingold, Lester C. Loschky, George W. McConkie, and Dave M. Stampe. 2003. Gaze-Contingent Multiresolutional Displays: An Integrative Review. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45, 2 (June 2003), 307--328.Google Scholar
- Jyrki Rovamo and Veijo Virsu. 1979. An Estimation and Application of the Human Cortical Magnification Factor. Experimental Brain Research 37, 3 (1979), 495--510.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steven Schirra and Frank R. Bentley. 2015. "It's Kind of Like an Extra Screen for My Phone": Understanding Everyday Uses of Consumer Smart Watches. In Proc. CHI EA '15. ACM, 2151--2156. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herman Snellen. 1862. Optotypi ad Visum Determinandum. Weyers (1862).Google Scholar
- Alexander Toet. 2006. Gaze Directed Displays as an Enabling Technology for Attention Aware Systems. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 4 (July 2006), 615--647.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Melanie Tory and Torsten Möller. 2004. Human Factors in Visualization Research. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 10, 1 (Jan 2004), 72--84. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Vogel and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2004. Interactive Public Ambient Displays: Transitioning from Implicit to Explicit, Public to Personal, Interaction with Multiple Users. In Proc. UIST '04. ACM, 137--146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amanda Williams, Shelly Farnham, and Scott Counts. 2006. Exploring Wearable Ambient Displays for Social Awareness. In Proc. CHI EA '06. ACM, 1529--1534. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David R. Williams, Geunyoung Yoon, Antonio Guirao, Heidi Hofer, Jason Porter, Scott M. Macrae, Ronald R. Krueger, and Raymond A. Applegate. 2001. How Far Can We Extend the Limits of Human Vision? Customized Corneal Ablation 1 (2001).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Modeling Perceived Screen Resolution Based on Position and Orientation of Wrist-Worn Devices
Recommendations
Infotainment across access devices: the perceptual impact of multimedia QoS
SAC '04: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM symposium on Applied computingThe introduction of multimedia on pervasive and mobile communication devices raises a number of perceptual quality issues. However, limited work has been done examining the 3-way interaction between use of equipment, user perceptual quality and quality ...
Perceived Vibration Strength in Mobile Devices: The Effect of Weight and Frequency
This paper addresses the question of strength perception for vibration signals used in mobile devices. Employing devices similar to standard cell phones and using pulsed vibration signals to combat adaptation effects, experiments were performed to study ...
Shared-screen social gaming with portable devices
MobileHCI '10: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and servicesMobile phones are designed as personal devices, and thus mobile games often lack the social element present in other game platforms, e.g., in console games. In this paper, we present an interaction method for social gaming with portable devices. The ...
Comments