skip to main content
10.1145/3174910.3174937acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

V8 Storming: How Far Should Two Ideas Be?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

All innovative ideas are said to be pairings of existing ideas. In collaborative ideation, various methods are used to suggest words for stimulating ideation based on the theory that suggesting strongly related words to the ideation topic will activate and enhance the ideation. However, the relationship between the words suggested by the system and the words that users associate remains unclear. Solving this issue will help selecting words suggestion in computer-supported ideation systems, in which the information flow is fluid and, therefore, users have strictly limited time for interaction. To address this issue, we studied the relationship between pairs of words suggested by computer and the quantity of associated ideas by users. We also conducted a user study on practical applications.

References

  1. 2017. Google Cloud Speech API. (30 Oct 2017). Retrieved Oct 30, 2017 from https://cloud.google.com/speech/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2017. Wikipedia Dump (Japanese Version). (30 Oct 2017). Retrieved Oct 30, 2017 from https://dumps.wikimedia.org/jawiki/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Salvatore Andolina, Khalil Klouche, Diogo Cabral, Tuukka Ruotsalo, and Giulio Jacucci. 2015. InspirationWall: supporting idea generation through automatic information exploration. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, 103--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Salvatore Andolina, Hendrik Schneider, Joel Chan, Khalil Klouche, Giulio Jacucci, and Steven Dow. 2017. Crowdboard: Augmenting In-Person Idea Generation with Real-Time Crowds. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM, 106--118. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Tony Bergstrom and Karrie Karahalios. 2007. Conversation Clock: Visualizing audio patterns in co-located groups. In System Sciences, 2007. HICSS 2007. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 78--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tony Bergstrom and Karrie Karahalios. 2008. Conversation clusters: human-computer dialog for topic extraction. In CHI'08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2829--2834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1996. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Otmar Hilliges, Lucia Terrenghi, Sebastian Boring, David Kim, Hendrik Richter, and Andreas Butz. 2007. Designing for collaborative creative problem solving. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on Creativity & cognition. ACM, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tobias Höllerer, Steven Feiner, Tachio Terauchi, Gus Rashid, and Drexel Hallaway. 1999. Exploring MARS: developing indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system. Computers & Graphics 23, 6 (1999), 779--785.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Taku Kudo. 2005. Mecab: Yet another part-of-speech and morphological analyzer. http://mecab.sourceforge.net/ (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3111--3119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kenneth Schofield and Niall R Lynam. 2001. Vehicle rearview mirror display system. (March 6 2001). US Patent 6,198,409.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yang Shi, Yang Wang, Ye Qi, John Chen, Xiaoyao Xu, and Kwan-Liu Ma. 2017. IdeaWall: Improving Creative Collaboration through Combinatorial Visual Stimuli. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 594--603. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ben Shneiderman. 2007. Creativity support tools: Accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun. ACM 50, 12 (2007), 20--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Daniel Wigdor, Hao Jiang, Clifton Forlines, Michelle Borkin, and Chia Shen. 2009. WeSpace: the design development and deployment of a walk-up and share multi-surface visual collaboration system. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1237--1246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rebecca Xiong and Judith Donath. 1999. PeopleGarden: creating data portraits for users. In Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 37--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. V8 Storming: How Far Should Two Ideas Be?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          AH '18: Proceedings of the 9th Augmented Human International Conference
          February 2018
          229 pages
          ISBN:9781450354158
          DOI:10.1145/3174910

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 February 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader