Patrizio Pelliccione
Avenir Kobetski
ABSTRACT
Future transportation systems will be a heterogeneous mix of items with varying connectivity and interoperability. A mix of new technologies and legacy systems will co-exist to realize a variety of scenarios involving not only connected cars but also road infrastructures, pedestrians, cyclists, etc. Future transportation systems can be seen as a System of Systems (SoS), where each constituent system - one of the units that compose an SoS - can act as a standalone system, but the cooperation among the constituent systems enables new emerging and promising scenarios. In this paper we investigate how to architect cars so that they can be constituents of future transportation systems. This work is realized in the context of two Swedish projects coordinated by Volvo Cars and involving some universities and research centers in Sweden and many suppliers of the OEM, including Autoliv, Arccore, Combitech, Cybercom, Knowit, Prevas, ÅF-Technology, Semcom, and Qamcom.
- ISO 26262:2011. Road vehicles - functional safety.Google Scholar
- C. Bergenhem. Approaches for facilities layer protocols for platooning. In Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on, pages 1989--1994. IEEE, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Bergenhem, S. Shladover, E. Coelingh, C. Englund, and S. Tsugawa. Overview of platooning systems. In Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress, Oct 22-26, Vienna, Austria (2012), 2012.Google Scholar
- J. Boardman and B. Sauser. System of systems - the meaning of of. In 2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering, pages 6 pp.-, April 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- U. Eliasson, R. Heldal, P. Pelliccione, and J. Lantz. Architecting in the automotive domain: Descriptive vs prescriptive architecture. In Proceedings of WICSA2015, pages 115--118, May 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ETSI. En 302 637-3 v1.2.2 intelligent transport systems (its); vehicular communications; basic set of applications; part 3: Specifications of decentralized environmental notification basic service. ETSI, 2012.Google Scholar
- ETSI. En 302 637-2 v1.3.2 intelligent transport systems (its); vehicular communications; basic set of applications; part 2: Specification of cooperative awareness basic service. ETSI, 2014.Google Scholar
- J. Fitzgerald, P. G. Larsen, and J. Woodcock. Foundations for Model-Based Engineering of Systems of Systems, pages 1--19. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014.Google Scholar
- R. Heldal, P. Pelliccione, U. Eliasson, J. Lantz, J. Derehag, and J. Whittle. Descriptive vs prescriptive models in industry. In ACM/IEEE 19th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS 2016), 2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. K. International. Global Automotive Executive Survey: From a product-centric world to a service-driven digital universe. 2017.Google Scholar
- ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011 Systems and software engineering - Architecture description, 2011.Google Scholar
- ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2010 Systems and software engineering - Vocabulary. Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec-ieee:24765:ed-1:v1:en.Google Scholar
- N. Leveson. Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. Mit Press, 2011.Google Scholar
- M. W. Maier. Architecting principles for systems-of-systems. In INCOSE International Symposium, volume 6, pages 565--573, 1996.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. B. Nielsen, P. G. Larsen, J. Fitzgerald, J. Woodcock, and J. Peleska. Systems of systems engineering: Basic concepts, model-based techniques, and research directions. ACM Comput. Surv., 48(2):18:1--18:41, Sept. 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Pelliccione, E. Knauss, R. Heldal, S. M. Ågren, P. Mallozzi, A. Alminger, and D. Borgentun. Automotive Architecture Framework: The Experience of Volvo Cars. Journal of Systems Architecture, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Rasmussen. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety science, 27(2):183--213, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. C. Shoup. The high cost of free parking. American Planning Association Planners Press, Chicago, updated {ed.}. edition, 2011.Google Scholar
- R. Spalazzese, P. Pelliccione, and U. Eklund. INTERO: an Interoperability Model for Large Systems. IEEE Software, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Tolk. What comes after the semantic web - pads implications for the dynamic web. In Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Principles of Advanced and Distributed Simulation, PADS '06, pages 55--, Washington, DC, USA, 2006. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Uhlemann. Connected-vehicles applications are emerging {connected vehicles}. IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, 11(1):25--96, March 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. A. Uzcategui, A. J. D. Sucre, and G. Acosta-Marum. Wave: A tutorial. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(5):126--133, May 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. van Staa. How kets can contribute to the re-industrialisation of europe. In European Technology Congress, Wroc law, June 12-13, 2014: http://docplayer.net/21724658-Date-2012-how-kets-can-contribute-to-the-re-industrialisation-of-europe.html, 2014.Google Scholar
- E. Vinkhuyzen and M. Cefkin. Developing socially acceptable autonomous vehicles. In Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings, number 2, pages 522--534, 2016.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Wang, A. Tolk, and W. Wang. The levels of conceptual interoperability model: Applying systems engineering principles to m&s. In Proceedings of the 2009 Spring Simulation Multiconference, SpringSim '09, pages 168:1--168:9, San Diego, CA, USA, 2009. Society for Computer Simulation International. Google ScholarDigital Library
- WHO. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015. World Health Organization, 2015. ISBN 978 92 4 156506 6.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Beyond connected cars: A systems of systems perspective
AbstractThe automotive domain is rapidly changing in the last years. Among the different challenges OEMs (i.e. the vehicle manufacturers) are facing, vehicles are evolving into systems of systems. In fact, over the last years vehicles have ...
Autonomous Driving: Investigating the Feasibility of Bimodal Take-Over Requests
Autonomous vehicles will need de-escalation strategies to compensate when reaching system limitations. Car-driver handovers can be considered one possible method to deal with system boundaries. The authors suggest a bimodal auditory and visual handover ...
PlatoonPal: User-Centered Development and Evaluation of an Assistance System for Heavy-Duty Truck Platooning
Automotive'UI 16: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsTruck platooning has advantages for fuel consumption, road safety, and use of the existing road infrastructure. However, it does not simplify the job of truck drivers who reportedly fear driving in close distance and mistrust the automation. Prior work ...
Comments