skip to main content
10.1145/3180308.3180325acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Ether-Toolbars: Evaluating Off-Screen Toolbars for Mobile Interaction

Published:05 March 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In mobile interaction, the use of touchscreen interaction, while beneficial from the perspective of portability, has limited spatial accuracy due to the "fat finger problem". As a result, an important challenge on mobile interaction is to find solutions to balance the size of individual widgets against the number of widgets needed during interaction. In this work, to address display space limitations, we explore the design of invisible off-screen toolbars (ether-toolbars) that leverage computer vision to expand application features by placing widgets adjacent to the display screen. We demonstrate a prototype system consisting of an inexpensive 3D printed mount for mirror that supports ether-toolbar implementations.

References

  1. Daniel Avrahami, Jacob O Wobbrock, and Shahram Izadi. 2011. Portico: tangible interaction on and around a tablet. In Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 347--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Patrick Baudisch, Edward Cutrell, Ken Hinckley, and Robert Gruen. 2004. Mouse Ether: Accelerating the Acquisition of Targets Across Multi-monitor Displays (CHI EA '04). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Xiang Cao, Clifton Forlines, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2007. Multi-user Interaction Using Handheld Projectors (UIST '07). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Xiang 'Anthony' Chen, Tovi Grossman, Daniel J. Wigdor, and George Fitzmaurice. 2014. Duet: Exploring Joint Interactions on a Smart Phone and a Smart Watch (CHI '14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Khalad Hasan, David Ahlström, Junhyeok Kim, and Pourang Irani. 2017. AirPanes: Two-Handed Around-Device Interaction for Pane Switching on Smartphones (CHI '17). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bonifaz Kaufmann and Martin Hitz. 2012. X-large Virtual Workspaces for Projector Phones Through Peephole Interaction (MM '12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jarrod Knibbe, Diego Martinez Plasencia, Christopher Bainbridge, Chee-Kin Chan, Jiawei Wu, Thomas Cable, Hassan Munir, and David Coyle. Extending interaction for smart watches: enabling bimanual around device control. In CHI'14 EA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nicolai Marquardt, Ken Hinckley, and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Cross-device Interaction via Micro-mobility and F-formations (UIST '12). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ether-Toolbars: Evaluating Off-Screen Toolbars for Mobile Interaction

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IUI '18 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
      March 2018
      141 pages
      ISBN:9781450355711
      DOI:10.1145/3180308

      Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 March 2018

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • demonstration
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IUI '18 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate63of127submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader