Simulation and analysis of a circuit board manufacturing facility

ABSTRACT

A simulation model is used to analyze the effects of various factors on the performance of a complex manufacturing system. The system under study is a large circuit board manufacturing facility. There, circuit boards are assembled and tested on a wide variety of automated machines and manual workstations. The simulation model, written in the SLAM II language, is highly detailed in the manner in which processes are modelled. This becomes especially important in modelling circuit board testing where boards which fail are repaired and recirculated through the test stations. Detailed modelling also allows for numerous process routings among the different product types to be permitted. The model possesses a demonstrated accuracy in its portrayal of the real-world situation.

To make the most economical use of the model in the investigation of factor influence on system performance, experiments were conducted according to the principles of statistical experiment design. A 32-trial Hadamard design was employed to test the effects of such variables as lot size, order release schedules and quality on system performance. Performance measures included mean percent of work behind schedule, process flow time and in-process inventory levels. Significant results from these experiments are presented along with a set of guidelines, with respect to the factors investigated, which yielded favorable system performance results.

References

1. Baker, K.R. and Kanet, J.J. (1984). Improved decision rules in a c;ombined system for minimizing job tardir~ess, irnternat:ional Journal of Production Research 22:6,917-92}.
2. Buzacott, J.A. and Shanthikumar, J.G. (1985). On approximate queuelng mo4els of dynamic jcb shops. Management Science 31:7, 870-887.
3. Gershwin, S.B., Akella, R. and Choong, Y.F. (1985). Short-term production scheduling of an automated manufacturing facility. IBM Journal of Research and Development 29:4, 392-400.
4. Holoway, C.A. and Nelson, R.T. (1974). Job shop scheduling with due dates and variable processing times. Management Science 20:9, 1264-1272.
5. Sargent, R.G. (1983) . Validating simulation models. In: Proceedings of the 1983 Winter Simulation Conference (S. Roberts, J. Banks, and B. Schmiser, eds.) . Institute of Electrical and Electronics F.ngineers, San Francisco, California, 333-337.
6. Schlessinger, S. et al. (19v9). Terminology for model credibility. Simulation 32:3, i0 3-104.
7. Schruben, L.W. (1980) . Establishing the credibility of simulations. Simulation 34:3, I01-i05.
8. Shevell, S.F. (1985). SimuLation and Analysis of a Circuit Board Manufacturing Facility. Unpublished M.A.Sc. Thesis, Department of Management Sciences, University of %Taterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Enterprise computing

  • Operations research

    • Industry and manufacturing

  • Physical sciences and engineering

    • Electronics

    • Engineering

• Computing methodologies

  • Modeling and simulation

    • Model development and analysis

      • Model verification and validation

    • Simulation evaluation