skip to main content
10.1145/318371.318433acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Some methods for simulating random fields

Published:01 December 1987Publication History

ABSTRACT

Several methods exist for simulating random fields. This paper reviews some of the methods used to simulate stationary random fields in Rn, n ≥ 1. A recent study comparing the traditional turning bands method to a method called the random impact method is given. The results of this study indicate that the random impact model is comparable to the turning bands method in terms of execution time, and in terms of reproducibility of the covariance functions.

References

  1. Ahuja, N., and Schax:ter, B. (1983). Pa~tern Models. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooker, P. I. (1985). Two dimensional simulations by turning bands. Math. Geology 17,/~o. 1, 81-90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Carr, J. R. and Myers: D. E. (1985}. Cosim: A Fortran IV program for co-conditional simulation. Computers and Geoscienees. II, No. 6,675-705. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Dagan, 13. (1981). Analysis of flow through heterogeneous random aquifers by the method of ernbeddings matrix 1. Steady flow. Water Resources Research 17, No. 1, 107-121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Davis, M. (1987). Production of conditional simulations via the LU decomposition of the covariance matrix. Mathematical Geology 19, No. 2, 91-107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Doob, J. L. (1953). Stochastic Processes. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Iturbe-Rodriguez, I. and Mejia, J.M., (1974), The design of rainfall networks in time and space Water Resources Research 10, No. 4, 713-728.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson, M. (1987). Multivariate Statistical Simulation. Wiley, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Journel, A. (I974). Geostatistics for conditional simulation of ore-bodies. Economic Geology 69,673-687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Journel, A., and Huijbregts, Ch. (1978). Mining Geostatis. tics. Academic Press, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kennedy, J., and Gentle, J. E. (1980). Statlstieal Computing. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis, P.A.W., and Oram, E.J., (1987). Statistical methodology for statisticians, engineers and operations analysts. To appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mantoglou, A. (1987). Digital simulation of multivariate two-and three-dimensional stochastic processes with a spectral turning bands method. Mathemaffeal Geology 19, No. 2, 129-149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mantoglou, A., and Wilson, J. (1981). Simulations of random fields with the turning bands method. Report #264, Dept. Civil Engineering, MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mantoglou, A., and Wilson, 3. (1982). The turning bands method for simulations of random fields, using line generation by spectral method. Water Resources Research, 1379-1394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Matheron, G. (1973). The intrinsic random functions and their applications. Advances in Applied Probability 5, 437- 468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Mejia, F. M. and Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (1974). On the synthesis of random field sampling: An application to the generation of hydrologic spatial processes. Water Resource8 Research 10, No. 4, 705-711.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Miles, R. (1969}. Posson fiats in Euclidean spaces. Part I: A finite number of random uniform fiats. Advances in Applied Probability 1, 211-237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Miles, It. (1971). Poisson fiats in Euclidean spaces. Part II: Homogeneous flats and the complementary theorem. Advances in Applied Probability 3, 1-43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Newman, C. M., and Wright, A. L. (1987). Simulation of spatial processes: A random impact approach. In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Silliman, S., and Wright, A. L., (1987). In preparationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, L. and Freeze, A. (1979). Stochastic analysis of steady-state flow in a bounded domain, 2. Two-dimensional simulations. Water Resources Research 15, No. 6, 1543-1559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Thompson, Ababou, and Gelhar (1987). Applications and use of the three-dimensional turning bands random field generator in hydrology: Single realization problems. Ralph H. Parsons Laboratory, No. 313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yaglom, A.M. (1962). Theory of Stationary Random Functions. Prentice-Hall, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Some methods for simulating random fields

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WSC '87: Proceedings of the 19th conference on Winter simulation
        December 1987
        963 pages
        ISBN:0911801324
        DOI:10.1145/318371

        Copyright © 1987 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 December 1987

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate3,413of5,075submissions,67%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader