skip to main content
10.1145/3184558.3191594acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Do Violent People Smile: Social Media Analysis of their Profile Pictures

Published:23 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The popularity of online social platforms has also determined the emergence of violent and abusive behaviors reflecting real life issues into the digital arena. Cyberbullying, Internet banging, pedopornography, sexting are examples of these behaviors, as witnessed in the social media environments. Several studies have shown how to approximately detect those behaviors by analyzing the social interactions and in particular the content of the exchanged messages. The features considered in the models basically include detection of o ensive language through NLP techniques and vocabularies, social network structural measures and, if available, user context information. Our goal is to investigate those users who adopt offensive language and hate speech in Twitter by analyzing their profile pictures. Results show that violent people smile less and they are dominating by anger, fear and sadness.

References

  1. Mohammed Ali Al-garadi, Kasturi Dewi Varathan, and Sri Devi Ravana. 2016. Cybercrime detection in online communications: The experimental case of cyberbullying detection in the Twitter network. Computers in Human Behavior 63(2016), 433--443. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Saeideh Bakhshi, David A Shamma, and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Faces engage us: Photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram. In ACM Human factors in computing systems. 965--974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Alexandru Davidescu, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2015. Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation. PloS one 10, 2 (2015), e0118093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Despoina Chatzakou, Nicolas Kourtellis, Jeremy Blackburn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Gianluca Stringhini, and Athena Vakali. 2017. Detecting Aggressors and Bullies on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 767--768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mauro Coletto, Claudio Lucchese, Cristina Ioana Muntean, Franco Maria Nardini, Andrea Esuli, Chiara Renso, and Raffaele Perego. 2016. Sentiment-enhanced Multidimensional Analysis of Online Social Networks: Perception of the Mediterranean Refugees Crisis. In ASONAM 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M Coletto, C Lucchese, S Orlando, and R Perego. 2015. Electoral Predictions with Twitter: a Machine-Learning approach. In IIR 2015, Cagliari, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Maral Dadvar, Dolf Trieschnigg, Roeland Ordelman, and Franciska de Jong. 2013. Improving cyberbullying detection with user context. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 693--696. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Thomas Davidson, Dana Warmsley, Michael Macy, and Ingmar Weber. 2017. Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language. ICWSM 2017 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Julia Deeb-Swihart, Christopher Polack, Eric Gilbert, and Irfan A Essa. 2017. Selfie-Presentation in Everyday Life: A Large-Scale Characterization of Selfie Contexts on Instagram. In ICWSM. 42--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Karthik Dinakar, Roi Reichart, and Henry Lieberman. 2011. Modeling the detection of Textual Cyberbullying. The Social Mobile Web 11, 02 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Qianjia Huang, Vivek Kumar Singh, and Pradeep Kumar Atrey. 2014. Cyber Bullying Detection Using Social and Textual Analysis. In Intl. Workshop on SociallyAware Multimedia, ACM SAM 2014. 3--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Vasileios Lampos, Tijl De Bie, and Nello Cristianini. 2010. Flu detector-tracking epidemics on Twitter. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 599--602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Parma Nand, Rivindu Perera, and Abhijeet Kasture. {n. d.}. --How Bullying is this Message--: A Psychometric Thermometer for Bullying. ({n. d.}).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Desmond Upton Patton, Robert D Eschmann, and Dirk A Butler. 2013. Internet banging: New trends in social media, gang violence, masculinity and hip hop. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 5 (2013), A54--A59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Anna Schmidt and Michael Wiegand. 2017. A Survey on Hate Speech Detection using Natural Language Processing. SocialNLP 2017 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Vivek K Singh, Qianjia Huang, and Pradeep K Atrey. {n. d.}. Cyberbullying detection using probabilistic socio-textual information fusion. In IEEE/ACM ASOMAN 2016. 884--887. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A Squicciarini, S Rajtmajer, Y Liu, and Christopher Griffin. 2015. Identification and characterization of cyberbullying dynamics in an online social network. In IEEE/ACM ASOMAN 2015. 280--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wenbo Wang, Lu Chen, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, and Amit P Sheth. 2014. Cursing in english on twitter. In ACM conf. on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. ACM, 415--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Quanzeng You, Darío García-García, Mahohar Paluri, Jiebo Luo, and Jungseock Joo. 2017. Cultural Diffusion and Trends in Facebook Photographs. ICWSM 2017 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Changtao Zhong, Hau-wen Chan, Dmytro Karamshu, Dongwon Lee, and Nishanth Sastry. 2017. Wearing Many (Social) Hats: How Different are Your Different Social Network Personae ICWSM 2017 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Erjin Zhou, Zhimin Cao, and Qi Yin. 2015. Naive-deep face recognition: Touching the limit of LFW benchmark or not arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.04690 (2015).015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Do Violent People Smile: Social Media Analysis of their Profile Pictures

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          WWW '18: Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018
          April 2018
          2023 pages
          ISBN:9781450356404

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

          Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

          Publication History

          • Published: 23 April 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format