skip to main content
10.1145/3185089.3185108acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicscaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Review on the Effect of Student Learning Outcome and Teaching Technology in Omani's Higher Education Institution's Academic Accreditation Process

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Academic accreditation standards are defined clearly in Higher Educational Institutions (HEI) plans, management, and delivering results of assessment student with learning outcomes. In recent years, all universities and institutions work hard to increase their approval privileges, skills, achievements through getting the accreditation from HEI. The aim of this integrative review was to examine the current evidence on the impact of technology learning on student learning and academic performance and analysis the main factors of an institution accreditation process. The authors searched several electronic databases for relevant articles, with different learning techniques. The main contribution of this study lies in showing the general criteria's of accreditation standards that focus on essential technology enhanced learning, student learning outcomes, and faculty technology experience on academic performance of universities. The result from this paper is showing the relations between what have been done and presented before with methods, factors, suggestions to identify these activities.

References

  1. Alkharusi, H. (2011). Psychometric properties of the teacher assessment literacy questionnaire for preservice teachers in Oman. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1614-1624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Al-shafei, A. I., Bin Abdulrahman, K., Al-Qumaizi, K. I., & El-Mardi, A. S. (2015). Developing a generic model for total quality management in higher education in Saudi Arabia. Medical teacher, 37(sup1), S1-S4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Apandi, S. H., &Arshah, R. A. (2015). The Need of Dashboard in Social Research Network Sites for Researchers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Becher, M. (2013). Instruction Coordinators and Higher Education Accreditation: A Study of Awareness and Assessment Documentation Use. The Journal of Academic Librarianship/ Elsevier, 573-581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning (2nd.). Harlow: Longman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianchi, I. S., & Sousa, R. D. (2016). IT Governance mechanisms in higher education. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 941-946.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Calitz, A. P., Greyling, J. H., & Cullen, M. D. (2011, October). The accreditation of ICT degree programs in South Africa. In Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference on Knowledge, Innovation and Leadership in a Diverse, Multidisciplinary Environment (pp. 49-58). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Chróinín, D. N., Tormey, R., & O'Sullivan, M. (2012). Beginning teacher standards for physical education: Promoting a democratic ideal? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 78-88.CS2008, A. C. M. (2010). Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An Interim Revision of CS 2001. DOI= http://www. acm. org.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. CS2008, A. C. M. (2010). Computer Science Curriculum 2008: An Interim Revision of CS 2001. DOI= http://www. acm. org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. de Andrade, J. B. S. O., Garcia, J., de Andrade Lima, M., Barbosa, S. B., Heerdt, M. L., &Berchin, I. I. (2016). A proposal of a Balanced Scorecard for an environmental education program at universities. Journal of Cleaner Production.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. GFP standards final. (2010). Retrieved 1 1, 2017, from Oman Academic Standards General Foundation Programs: www.OAAA OMANGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., &Drysdale, J. S. (2012). An analysis of high impact scholarship and publication trends in blended learning. Distance Education, 33(3), 381-413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Harvey, L., & Newton, J. (2004). Transforming quality evaluation. Quality in higher education, 10(2), 149-165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hashim, A. A., &Majid, M. A. (2015).Effects of Video Display Terminal Resolutions to the Legibility of Text on a Web Page. International Journal of Software Engineering and Computer Systems, 1(1),131-157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91-99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hou, A. Y.-C. (2011). Quality assurance at a distance: international accreditation in Taiwan higher education. Springer-High Educ 61, 179--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Howieson, B., Hancock, P., Segal, N., Kavanagh, M., Tempone, I., & Kent, J. (2014). Who should teach what? Australian perceptions of the roles of universities and practice in the education of professional accountants. Journal of Accounting Education, 32(3), 259-275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kleebbua, C., &Siriparp, T. (2016). Effects of Education and Attitude on Essential Learning Outcomes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 941-949.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., &Ip, T. (2017). University english language learners' readiness to use computer technology for self-directed learning. System.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mashaw, B. (2009). Information technology approach in computer science. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 24(5), 191-197. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Murphy, D. R. (2009). Implementing the academic discipline of Information Technology to be inclusive of Computer Science. JCSC, January 2009, 24 (3), 25-31 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Oman Academic Accreditation Authority. (2010). Retrieved 1,1, 2010, from www.oaaa-oman: http://www.oaaa.gov.om/ar/Default.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. SCHNEIDER, C. G. (2016). Policy Priorities for Accreditation. Liberal Education Fall 2015, 24-28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Shakir, M., Abubakar, A. B., Yousoff, Y. B., Sagher, A. M., &Alkayali, H. (2016). Diagnosis security problems in cloud computing for business cloud. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 90(2), 151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Strang, K. D. (2013). University accreditation and benchmarking: Pedagogy that increases student achievement. International Journal of Educational Research/Science direct-Elsevier, 210-219.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates' assessment literacy: Implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30, 749 -- 770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT governance: How top performers manage IT decision rights for superior results. Harvard Business Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Wiggins, C., Beachboard, J., & Trimmer, K. (2006). Entrepreneurial IT governance: electronic medical records in rural healthcare. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), 1(4), 40-54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Zakaria, Z., Ahmad, A., &Norzaidi, M. (2009). Determining World Class University from the evaluation of service quality and students satisfaction level: An empirical study in Malaysia,. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 2(2), 59-66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Review on the Effect of Student Learning Outcome and Teaching Technology in Omani's Higher Education Institution's Academic Accreditation Process

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICSCA '18: Proceedings of the 2018 7th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications
      February 2018
      349 pages
      ISBN:9781450354141
      DOI:10.1145/3185089

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader