skip to main content
10.1145/3196478.3196482acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A building automation case study setup and challenges

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smart buildings will play a fundamental role in ensuring comfort while reducing the energy required. However, due to the lack of knowledge about the operation of the smart controllers, the occupants can unintentionally increase the energy spent. Nevertheless, there is evidence that the informed and motivated user will actually cooperate with the system.

Some of the issues associated with researching control systems in the context of building automation are difficult to address, because of the chronic lack of effective laboratory settings for experimentation. In this paper, we describe a system representative of the usual complexity found in cyber-physical systems, whose purpose is to address the needs for experimenting with building automation, with a focus on control systems and gamification. Designed with pragmatic concerns, this system presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities to research a new generation of software control systems, and supporting interfaces, that leverage the occupants' behaviour.

References

  1. Charilaos Akasiadis, Evaggelos Spyrou, Georgios Pierris, Dimitris Sgouropoulos, Giorgos Siantikos, Alexandros Mavrommatis, Costas Vrakopoulos, and Theodoros Giannakopoulos. 2015. Exploiting future internet technologies. In 8th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. ACM Press, New York, USA, 1--2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Larry Apfelbaum and John Doyle. 1997. Model based testing. In Software Quality Week Conference. 296--300.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ankica Barisic, Vasco Amaral, and Miguel Goulão. 2018. Usability driven DSL development with USE-ME. Computer Languages, Systems & Structures 51 (2018), 118--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sergiy Bogomolov, Marius Greitschus, Peter G. Jensen, Kim G. Larsen, Marius Mikučionis, Thomas Strump, and Stavros Tripakis. 2015. Co-Simulation of Hybrid Systems with SpaceEx and Uppaal. In 11th International Modelica Conference. Linköping University Electronic Press, Paris, France, 159--169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sarah Darby. 2008. Energy feedback in buildings: improving the infrastructure for demand reduction. Building Research & Information 36, 5 (oct 2008), 499--508.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Anna Carolina Kossmann de Menezes, Richard Tetlow, C Philip Beaman, Dino Bouchlaghem, Andrew Cripps, and Richard A Buswell. 2012. Assessing the impact of occupant behaviour on electricity consumption for lighting and small power in office buildings. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to gamefulness. In 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference on Envisioning Future Media Environments. ACM Press, New York, USA, 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. W. Stuart Dols, Steven J. Emmerich, and Brian J. Polidoro. 2016. Coupling the multizone airflow and contaminant transport software CONTAM with En-ergyPlus using co-simulation. Building Simulation 9, 4 (aug 2016), 469--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A.I. Dounis and C. Caraiscos. 2009. Advanced control systems engineering for energy and comfort management in a building environment-A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13, 6--7 (aug 2009), 1246--1261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Mark Eilers, John Reed, and TecMRKT Works. 1996. Behavioral aspects of lighting and occupancy sensors in private offices: a case study of a university office building. Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (1996).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Valentina Fabi, Rune Vinther Andersen, Stefano Corgnati, and Bjarne W. Olesen. 2012. Occupants' window opening behaviour: A literature review of factors influencing occupant behaviour and models. Building and Environment 58 (dec 2012), 188--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cláudio Gomes, Paschalis Karalis, Eva M. Navarro-López, and Hans Vangheluwe. 2017. Approximated Stability Analysis of Bi-Modal Hybrid Co-simulation Scenarios. In 1st Workshop on Formal Co-Simulation of Cyber-Physical Systems. Trento, Italy, to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Cláudio Gomes, Benoît Legat, Raphaël M. Jungers, and Hans Vangheluwe. 2017. Stable Adaptive Co-simulation : A Switched Systems Approach. In IUTAM Symposium on Co-Simulation and Solver Coupling. Darmstadt, Germany, to appear.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cláudio Gomes, Casper Thule, David Broman, Peter Gorm Larsen, and Hans Vangheluwe. 2017. Co-simulation: State of the art. Technical Report. arXiv:1702.00686 http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00686Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cláudio Gomes, Yentl Van Tendeloo, Joachim Denil, Paul De Meulenaere, and Hans Vangheluwe. 2017. Hybrid System Modelling and Simulation with Dirac Deltas. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation: DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium (DEVS '17). Virginia Beach, Virginia, USA, to appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Harte. 2005. Fault tolerance in sensor networks using self-diagnosing sensor nodes. In IEE Seminar on Intelligent Building Environments, Vol. 2005. IEE, v2--7--v2--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tianzhen Hong and Hung-Wen Lin. 2013. Occupant behavior: impact on energy use of private offices. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Daniel Johnson, Ella Horton, Rory Mulcahy, and Marcus Foth. 2017. Gamification and serious games within the domain of domestic energy consumption: A systematic review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 73 (jun 2017), 249--264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Vasileios Karagiannis, Periklis Chatzimisios, Francisco Vazquez-Gallego, and Jesus Alonso-Zarate. 2015. A Survey on Application Layer Protocols for the Internet of Things. Transaction on IoT and Cloud Computing 3, 1 (2015), 11--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. David P. Y. Lawrence, Claudio Gomes, Joachim Denil, Hans Vangheluwe, and Didier Buchs. 2016. Coupling Petri nets with Deterministic Formalisms Using Co-simulation. In Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation: DEVS Integrative M&S Symposium. Pasadena, CA, USA, 6:1--6:8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Edward A. Lee. 2008. Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges. In 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC). 363--369. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Edward A Lee, Mehrdad Niknami, Thierry S Nouidui, and Michael Wetter. 2015. Modeling and Simulating Cyber-physical Systems Using CyPhySim. In 12th International Conference on Embedded Software (EMSOFT '15). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 115--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Libelium. 2018. Open Aquarium Platform Description. (2018). https://www.cooking-hacks.com/documentation/tutorials/open-aquarium-aquaponics-fish-tank-monitoring-arduinoGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Levi Lúcio, Bentley James Oakes, Cláudio Gomes, Gehan Selim, Juergen Dingel, James R. Cordy, andHans Vangheluwe. 2015. SyVOLT: Full Model Transformation Verification Using Contracts. In 8th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. Ottawa, Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Toni Mancini, Federico Mari, Annalisa Massini, Igor Melatti, Fabio Merli, and Enrico Tronci. 2013. System Level Formal Verification via Model Checking Driven Simulation. In Computer Aided Verification, Natasha Sharygina and Helmut Veith (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 8044. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 296--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Luca Morganti, Federica Pallavicini, Elena Cadel, Antonio Candelieri, Francesco Archetti, and Fabrizia Mantovani. 2017. Gaming for Earth: Serious games and gamification to engage consumers in pro-environmental behaviours for energy efficiency. Energy Research & Social Science 29 (jul 2017), 95--102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sirajum Munir, John a. Stankovic, Chieh-Jan Mike Liang, and Shan Lin. 2013. Cyber Physical System Challenges for Human-in-the-Loop Control. The 8th International Workshop on Feedback Computing (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic Books (AZ).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. T G Papaioannou, D Kotsopoulos, C Bardaki, and S Lounis. 2017. " IoT-Enabled Gamification for Energy Conservation in Public Buildings ". (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wout Parys, Dirk Saelens, and Hugo Hens. 2011. Coupling of dynamic building simulation with stochastic modelling of occupant behaviour in offices - a review-based integrated methodology. Journal of Building Performance Simulation 4, 4 (dec 2011), 339--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Srinath Perera, Suhothayan Sriskandarajah, Mohanadarshan Vivekanandalingam, Paul Fremantle, and Sanjiva Weerawarana. 2014. DEBS Grand Challenge : Solving the Grand Challenge Using an Opensource CEP engine Categories and Subject Descriptors. Debs '14 (2014), 288--293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Timothy I. Salsbury. 2005. A Survey of Control Technologies in the Building Automation Industry. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 38, 1 (2005), 90--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Dimitris Sgouropoulos, Evaggelos Spyrou, Giorgos Siantikos, and Theodoros Giannakopoulos. 2015. Counting and tracking people in a smart room: An IoT approach. In 10th International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization. IEEE, 1--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Pervez Hameed Shaikh, Nursyarizal Bin Mohd Nor, Perumal Nallagownden, Irraivan Elamvazuthi, and Taib Ibrahim. 2014. A review on optimized control systems for building energy and comfort management of smart sustainable buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 34 (jun 2014), 409--429.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. David Sousa Sousa Nunes, Pei Zhang, and Jorge Sa Silva. 2015. A Survey on human-in-The-loop applications towards an internet of all. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 17, 2 (2015), 944--965.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Richard M. Tetlow, Chris van Dronkelaar, C. Philip Beaman, Abbas A. Elmualim, and Kevin Couling. 2015. Identifying behavioural predictors of small power electricity consumption in office buildings. Building and Environment 92 (oct 2015), 75--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. C. J. Tomlin, I. Mitchell, A. M. Bayen, and M. Oishi. 2003. Computational techniques for the verification of hybrid systems. Proc. IEEE 91, 7 (jul 2003), 986--1001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Michal Veselý and Wim Zeiler. 2014. Personalized conditioning and its impact on thermal comfort and energy performance - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 34 (jun 2014), 401--408.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Molly Webb. 2008. Smart 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. Technical Report 1. 1 pages. https://www.theclimategroup.org/sites/default/files/archive/files/Smart2020Report.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. F. Yamada, K. Yonezawa, S. Sugawara, and N. Nishimura. 1999. Development of air-conditioning control algorithm for building energy saving. In IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, Vol. 2. IEEE, 1579--1584.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Wim Zeiler, Derek Vissers, Rik Maaijen, and Gert Boxem. 2014. Occupants' behavioural impact on energy consumption: 'human-in-the-loop' comfort process control. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 10, 1--2 (apr 2014), 108--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A building automation case study setup and challenges

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SEsCPS '18: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems
              May 2018
              66 pages
              ISBN:9781450357289
              DOI:10.1145/3196478

              Copyright © 2018 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 27 May 2018

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper

              Upcoming Conference

              ICSE 2025

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader