skip to main content
10.1145/3196709.3196754acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

Statement Making: A Maker Fashion Show Foregrounding Feminism, Gender, and Transdisciplinarity

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Maker culture has been increasingly pervasive in a variety of communities and contexts, in particular devoted spaces such as Makerspaces, Hackerspaces and Fab Labs. Several people, however, have pointed out that while one of the values of these spaces is radical inclusion, the general Maker culture can be exclusive to some based on gender, race, and socioeconomic status. With the goal of disrupting existing Maker culture by developing, diversifying, and empowering our own university Maker community, we created a semi-structured making experience that we call Statement Making. Statement Making is a Maker Fashion show that we invited anyone from the community to participate in by "making a statement" for them or a friend to wear in a runway show. We report outcomes and experiences of those who participated. We then discuss the key aspects of the event, especially surrounding its performative aspect, using design principles of Feminist HCI to argue that events with similar aspects might also be successful at disrupting existing culture.

References

  1. Mothership hackermoms. http://mothership.hackermoms.org/. Accessed: 2016-08--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. E. Adam, "Hacking into hacking: Gender and the hacker phenomenon," ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, vol. 33, no. 4, p. 3, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Austin Toombs. 2014. "Now that's definitely a proper hack": self-made tools in hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 473--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Sarah Ng. 2017. Supporting Cultures of Making: Technology, Policy, Visions, and Myths. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 6523--6535. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Robert Charles Birney, Harvey Burdick, and Richard Collier Teevan. Fear of failure. Van Nostrand-Reinhold Co., 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Leanne Bowler. Creativity through" maker" experiences and design thinking in the education of librarians. Knowledge Quest, 42(5):58, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Laura Britton. Power, access, status: The discourse of race, gender, and class in the maker movement. University of Washington Technology and Social Change Group, 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Buechley, Leah, et al. "The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education." Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Butler, Judith. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. routledge, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Debbie Chachra. Why I am not a maker. The Atlantic, 23, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C Plaut, Paul G Davies, and Claude M Steele. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of personality and social psychology, 97(6):1045, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarke, Victoria, and Virginia Braun. "Thematic analysis." Encyclopedia of critical psychology. Springer New York, 2014. 1947--1952.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dougherty, Dale. "The maker movement." Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 7.3 (2012): 11--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ensmenger, Nathan. "Beards, Sandals, and Other Signs of Rugged Individualism": Masculine Culture within the Computing Professions." Osiris 30.1 (2015): 38--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. K. Evans, "Barriers to participation of women in technological education and the role of distance education," Commonwealth of Learning, Vancouver, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Laura Fleming. Worlds of making: best practices for establishing a makerspace for your school. Corwin Press, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Laura Fleming. A maker culture. PRINCIPAL, 95(4):16--19, March April 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. I. Fourie and A. Meyer, "What to make of makerspaces: Tools and diy only or is there an interconnected information resources space?" Library Hi Tech, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 519--525, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sarah Fox, Rachel Rose Ulgado, and Daniela Rosner. Hacking culture, not devices: Access and recognition in feminist hackerspaces. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pages 56--68. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Roxanne Gay. 2014. Bad feminist. Hachette UK, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Neil Gershenfeld. 2008. Fab: the coming revolution on your desktop--from personal computers to personal fabrication. Basic Books, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Neil Gershenfeld, Alan Gershenfeld, Joel CutcherGershenfeld. 2017 Designing Reality. Basic Books, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Halverson, Erica Rosenfeld, and Kimberly Sheridan. "The maker movement in education." Harvard Educational Review84.4 (2014): 495--504.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mark Hatch (2013). The Maker Movement Manifesto. McGraw-Hill Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Henn, "When women stopped coding," NPR Planet Money, vol. 21, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Nathan Holbert. 2016. Bots for tots : building inclusive makerspaces by leveraging "ways of knowing ." In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC 2016), 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nathaniel Hudson, Celena Alcock, and Parmit K. Chilana. 2016. Understanding Newcomers to 3D Printing: Motivations, Workflows, and Barriers of Casual Makers. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 384--396. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Instructables. http://www.instructables.com/. Accessed: 2018--28-03Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Cindy Jacob and Bruno Dumas. 2014. Designing for intimacy: how fashion design can address privacy issues in wearable computing. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers: Adjunct Program (ISWC '14 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 185--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Oskar Juhlin, Yanqing Zhang, Cristine Sundbom, and Ylva Fernaeus. 2013. Fashionable shape switching: explorations in outfit-centric design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1353--1362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Oskar Juhlin and Yanqing Zhang. 2011. Unpacking social interaction that make us adore: on the aesthetics of mobile phones as fashion items. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. J. C. Kraft, "Who is a maker?" Bright, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuznetsov, Stacey, and Eric Paulos. "Rise of the Expert Amateur: Diy Projects, Communities, and Cultures." Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries ACM, 2010. 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. J. Lewis, "Barriers to women's involvement in hackspaces and makerspaces," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Silvia Lindtner, Garnet D. Hertz, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Emerging sites of HCI innovation: hackerspaces, hardware startups & incubators. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 439--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Lee Martin. The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1):4, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Milne, Andrew. What Makes a Maker: Common Attitudes, Habits and Skills from the Do-ItYourself (DIY) Community. Diss. Communication, Art & Technology: School of Interactive Arts and Technology, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. SSL Nagbot. 2016. "Feminist hacking/making: Exploring new gender horizons of possibility." Journal of Peer Production 8 (2016): 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Yue Pan and Eli Blevis. 2014. Fashion thinking: lessons from fashion and sustainable interaction design, concepts and issues. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1005--1014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Yue Pan and Erik Stolterman. 2015. What if HCI Becomes a Fashion Driven Discipline?. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2565--2568. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Rosner, D., and Bean, J. (2009). Learning From IKEA Hacking: I'm Not One to Decoupage a Tabletop and Call It a Day. In Proc. of CHI2009. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Kimberly Sheridan, et al. (2014). "Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces." Harvard Educational Review. 84(4):505--531.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Andrew Richard Schrock. Education in disguise: Culture of a hacker and maker space. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 10(1), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Schön, Sandra, Martin Ebner, and Swapna Kumar. "The Maker Movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching." eLearning Papers 39 (2014): 14--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. N. Taylor, U. Hurley, and P. Connolly, "Making community: the wider role of makerspaces in public life," in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2016, pp. 1415--1425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Austin L. Toombs. 2017. Hackerspace Tropes, Identities, and Community Values. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1079--1091. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Austin L. Toombs, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2015. The Proper Care and Feeding of Hackerspaces: Care Ethics and Cultures of Making. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 629--638. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Laurene Vaughan. 2006. Embodying design: the lived relationship between artefact, user and the lived experience of design. In Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1 (PDC '06), Vol. 1. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Anne Weibert, Andrea Marshall, Konstantin Aal, Kai Schubert, and Jennifer Rode. 2014. Sewing interest in E-textiles: analyzing making from a gendered perspective. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Rebekah Willett (2017): Learning through making in public libraries: theories, practices, and tensions, Learning, Media and Technology,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Statement Making: A Maker Fashion Show Foregrounding Feminism, Gender, and Transdisciplinarity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2018
      1418 pages
      ISBN:9781450351980
      DOI:10.1145/3196709

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader