ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the correct translation of update operations on relational views
Full text PdfPdf (2.55 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) archive
Volume 7 ,  Issue 3  (September 1982) table of contents
Pages: 381 - 416  
Year of Publication: 1982
ISSN:0362-5915
Authors
Umeshwar Dayal  Computer Corp. of America, Cambridge, MA
Philip A. Bernstein  Hardvard Univ., Cambridge, MA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 60,   Citation Count: 56
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/319732.319740
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Most relational database systems provide a facility for supporting user views. Permitting this level of abstraction has the danger, however, that update requests issued by a user within the context of his view may not translate correctly into equivalent updates on the underlying database. The purpose of this paper is to formalize the notion of update translation and derive conditions under which translation procedures will produce correct translations of view updates.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
TSICHRITZIS, D., AND KLUG, A.C. ANSI/X3/SPARC DBMS Framework. Report of the study group on data base management systems, AFIPS Press, Arlington, Va., 1977.
 
2
ARMSTRONG, W.W. Dependency structures of database relationships. Information Processing 74, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 580-583.
3
 
4
BEERI, C., BERNSTEIN, P.A., AND GOODMAN, N. A sophisticate's introduction to database normalization theory. In Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Very Large Databases (Berlin, West Germany, Sept. 1978), 113-124.
5
 
6
CARLSON, C.R., AND ARORA, A.K. The updatability of relational views based on functional dependencies. In Proc. IEEE COMPSAC, IEEE, New York, 1979, pp. 415-420.
 
7
CHAMBERLIN, D.D., GRAY, J.N., AND TRAIGER, I.L. Views, authorization, and locking in a relational database system. In Proc. AFIPS Nat. Computer Conf., Vol. 44, AFIPS Press, Arlington, Va., 1975, pp. 425-430.
 
8
CHAMBERLIN, D.D., ASTRAHAN, M.M., ESWARAN, K.P., GRIFFITHS, P.P., LORIE, R.A., MEHL, J.W., REISNER, P., AND WADS, B.W. SEQUEL 2: A unified approach to data definition, manipulation, and control. IBM J. Res. Dev. (Nov. 1976), 560-575.
 
9
CLEMONS, E.K. An external schema facility to support database update. In Databases, Academic Press, New York, 1978.
 
10
CODD, E.F. Relational completeness of database sublanguages. In Database Systems, Courant Computer Science Symposia 6, R. Rustin, Ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood-Cliffs, N.J., 1972, pp. 64-98.
 
11
CODD, E.F. Further normalization of the database relational model. In Database Systems, Courant Computer Science Symposia 6, R. Rustin, Ed., Prentice-HaU, Englewood-Cliffs, N.J., 1972, pp. 33-64.
 
12
CODD, E.F. Recent investigations in a relational database system. Information Processing 74, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 1017-1021.
 
13
CODD, E.F. Understanding relations {Installment #7). FDT Bull. ACM-SIGMOD 7, 3-4 (1975), 23-28.
14
 
15
 
16
DAYAL, U. Schema-mapping problems in database systems. Ph.D. dissertation, and Tech. Rep. TR-11-79, Center for Research in Computing Technology, Harvard Univ., Cambridge, Mass., Aug. 1979.
 
17
DAYAL, U., AND BERNSTEIN, P.A. On the updatability of relational views. In Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Very Large Databases (Berlin, West Germany, Sept. 1978), 368-378.
 
18
DAYAL, U., AND BERNSTEIN, P.A. On the updatability of network views--Extending relational views theory to the Network Model. Inf. Syst. 7, 1 (1982}.
 
19
DROOBY, N. An implementation of the theory of view mappings. M.A. thesis, Univ. of Texas, Austin, May 1981.
 
20
ESWARAN, K.P., AND CHAMBERLIN, D.D. Functional specifications of a subsystem for database integrity. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Very Large Databases (Framingham, Mass.), 1975, pp. 48-68.
 
21
ENDERTON, H.B. A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. Academic Press, New York, 1972.
22
 
23
FURTADO, A.L., AND SEVCIK, K.C. Permitting updates through views of data bases. Inf. Syst. 4 (1979), 269-283.
24
 
25
HAMMER, M.M., AND MCLEOD, D.J. Semantic integrity in a relational database system. In Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Very Large Databases (Framingham, Mass.), 1975, pp. 25-47.
 
26
HELD, G.D., STONRBRAKER, M.R., AND WONG, E. INGRES--A relational database system. In Proc. AFIPS Nat. Computer Conf., Vol. 44, AFIPS Press, Arlington, Va., 1975, pp. 409-416.
 
27
 
28
 
29
OSMAN, I.M. Updating defined relations. In Proc. Nat. Computer Conf. Vol. 48, AFIPS Press, Arlington, Va., June 1979, pp. 733-740.
30
 
31
PELAGATTI, G., PAOLINI, P:, AND BRACCHI, G. Mapping external views to a common data model. Inf. Syst. 3, 2 (1978), 141-151.
32
 
33
SEVCIK, K.C., AND FURTADO, A.L. Complete and compatible sets of update operations. In Int. Conf. on Management of Data (ICMOD), (Milan, italy, June), 1978.
34
 
35
TODD, S. Automatic constraint maintenance and updating defined relations. Information Processing 77, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 145-148.

CITED BY  56
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Umeshwar Dayal: colleagues
Philip A. Bernstein: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: