skip to main content
extended-abstract

Heavy-Traffic Delay Insensitivity in Connection-Level Models of Data Transfer with Proportionally Fair Bandwidth Sharing

Published: 20 March 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Motivated by the stringent requirements on delay performance in data center networks, we study a connection-level model for bandwidth sharing among data transfer flows, where file sizes have phase-type distributions and proportionally fair bandwidth allocation is used. We analyze the expected number of files in steady-state by setting the steady-state drift of an appropriately chosen Lyapunov function equal to zero. We consider the heavy-traffic regime and obtain asymptotically tight bounds on the expected number of files in the system. Our results show that the expected number of files under proportionally fair bandwidth allocation is insensitive in heavy traffic to file size distributions, thus complementing the diffusion approximation result of Vlasiou et al. [20].

References

[1]
S. Asmussen. Applied Probability and Queues. Springer- Verlag New York, 2003.
[2]
D. Bertsimas, D. Gamarnik, and J. N. Tsitsiklis. Performance of multiclass markovian queueing networks via piecewise linear lyapunov functions. Ann. Appl. Probab., 11(4):1384-1428, 11 2001.
[3]
T. Bonald and L. Massoulié. Impact of fairness on internet performance. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS Int. Conf. Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pages 82-91, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
[4]
T. Bonald and A. Prouti`ere. Insensitive bandwidth sharing in data networks. Queueing Syst., 44(1):69- 100, 2003.
[5]
M. Bramson. State space collapse with application to heavy traffic limits for multiclass queueing networks. Queueing Syst., 30(1/2):89-148, June 1998.
[6]
G. de Veciana, T.-J. Lee, and T. Konstantopoulos. Stability and performance analysis of networks supporting elastic services. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 9(1):2-14, Feb. 2001.
[7]
A. Eryilmaz and R. Srikant. Asymptotically tight steady-state queue length bounds implied by drift conditions. Queueing Syst., 72(3-4):311-359, Dec. 2012.
[8]
B. Hajek. Hitting-time and occupation-time bounds implied by drift analysis with applications. Adv. Appl. Probab., 14(3):502-525, 1982.
[9]
W. N. Kang, F. P. Kelly, N. H. Lee, and R. J. Williams. State space collapse and diffusion approximation for a network operating under a fair bandwidth sharing policy. Ann. Appl. Probab., 19(5):1719-1780, Oct. 2009.
[10]
F. Kelly. Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. Eur. T. Telecommun., 8(1):33-37, 1997.
[11]
Y. Lu, S. T. Maguluri, M. S. Squillante, and T. Suk. On optimal weighted-delay scheduling in input-queued switches. arXiv:1704.02302 {math.OC}, Apr. 2017.
[12]
D. G. Luenberger. Optimization by Vector Space Methods. JohnWiley & Sons, 1969.
[13]
S. T. Maguluri and R. Srikant. Heavy traffic queue length behavior in a switch under the maxweight algorithm. Stoch. Syst., 6(1):211-250, 2016.
[14]
S. T. Maguluri, R. Srikant, and L. Ying. Heavy traffic optimal resource allocation algorithms for cloud computing clusters. Perform. Eval., 81:20-39, 2014.
[15]
S. T. Maguluri, S. K. Burle, and R. Srikant. Optimal heavy-traffic queue length scaling in an incompletely saturated switch. In Proc. ACM SIGMETRICS Int. Conf. Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pages 13-24, Antibes Juan-les-Pins, France, 2016.
[16]
L. Massoulié and J. W. Roberts. Bandwidth sharing and admission control for elastic traffic. Telecommun. Syst., 15(1):185-201, 2000.
[17]
F. Paganini, A. Tang, A. Ferragut, and L. L. H. Andrew. Network stability under alpha fair bandwidth allocation with general file size distribution. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 57(3):579-591, Mar. 2012.
[18]
D. Shah, J. N. Tsitsiklis, and Y. Zhong. Qualitative properties of α-fair policies in bandwidth-sharing networks. Ann. Appl. Probab., 24(1):76-113, 2014.
[19]
E. D. Sontag. Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite Dimensional Systems. Springer-Verlag, 1990.
[20]
M. Vlasiou, J. Zhang, and B. Zwart. Insensitivity of proportional fairness in critically loaded bandwidth sharing networks. arXiv:1411.4841v2 {math.PR}, 2014.
[21]
C.-H. Wang, S. T. Maguluri, and T. Javidi. Heavy traffic queue length behavior in switches with reconfiguration delay. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Atlanta, GA, May 2017.
[22]
W. Wang, K. Zhu, L. Ying, J. Tan, and L. Zhang. MapTask scheduling in MapReduce with data locality: Throughput and heavy-traffic optimality. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 24:190-203, Feb. 2016.
[23]
W. Wang, S. T. Maguluri, R. Srikant, and L. Ying. Heavy-traffic delay insensitivity in connection-level models of data transfer with proportionally fair bandwidth sharing. Technical report, 2017.
[24]
R. Williams. Diffusion approximations for open multiclass queueing networks: sufficient conditions involving state space collapse. Queueing Syst., 30(1):27-88, 1998.
[25]
Q. Xie and Y. Lu. Priority algorithm for near-data scheduling: Throughput and heavy-traffic optimality. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Computer Communications (INFOCOM), pages 963-972, Hong Kong, China, Apr. 2015.
[26]
H.-Q. Ye and D. D. Yao. A stochastic network under proportional fair resource control-diffusion limit with multiple bottlenecks. Oper. Res., 60(3):716-738, 2012.
[27]
H.-Q. Ye and D. D. Yao. Diffusion limit of fair resource control-stationarity and interchange of limits. Math. Oper. Res., 41(4):1161-1207, 2016.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Heavy-Traffic Delay Insensitivity in Connection-Level Models of Data Transfer with Proportionally Fair Bandwidth Sharing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
    ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 45, Issue 3
    December 2017
    253 pages
    ISSN:0163-5999
    DOI:10.1145/3199524
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 20 March 2018
    Published in SIGMETRICS Volume 45, Issue 3

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Sharp Waiting-Time Bounds for Multiserver JobsStochastic Systems10.1287/stsy.2023.000614:4(455-478)Online publication date: Dec-2024
    • (2024)Large-System Insensitivity of Zero-Waiting Load Balancing AlgorithmsStochastic Systems10.1287/stsy.2022.0023Online publication date: 22-Jan-2024
    • (2024)Server Saturation in Skewed NetworksProceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems10.1145/36560188:2(1-37)Online publication date: 29-May-2024
    • (2024)Heavy-traffic queue length behavior in a switch under Markovian arrivalsAdvances in Applied Probability10.1017/apr.2023.60(1-47)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
    • (2023)Load Balancing Under Strict Compatibility ConstraintsMathematics of Operations Research10.1287/moor.2022.125848:1(227-256)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
    • (2022)Heavy-Traffic Insensitive Bounds for Weighted Proportionally Fair Bandwidth Sharing PoliciesMathematics of Operations Research10.1287/moor.2021.122547:4(2691-2720)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022
    • (2022)Zero Queueing for Multi-Server JobsACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review10.1145/3543516.345392449:1(13-14)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2022
    • (2022)Sharp waiting-time bounds for multiserver jobsProceedings of the Twenty-Third International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing10.1145/3492866.3549717(161-170)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2022
    • (2021)On Little’s Formula in Multiphase QueuesMathematics10.3390/math91822829:18(2282)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2021
    • (2021)Beyond ScalingProceedings of the Twenty-second International Symposium on Theory, Algorithmic Foundations, and Protocol Design for Mobile Networks and Mobile Computing10.1145/3466772.3467029(1-10)Online publication date: 26-Jul-2021
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media