AR-maze: a tangible programming tool for children based on AR technology

ABSTRACT

Programming is an effective way to foster children's computational thinking. We present AR-Maze, which is a novel tangible programming tool using Augmented Reality (AR) technology for young children. AR-Maze superposes constant feedback on the physical world and maintains a positive, low-cost learning environment. Using this system, children could create their own programs by arranging programming blocks and debug or execute the code with a mobile device. In addition, they will be able to learn fundamental programming concepts, such as parameters, loop logic, debug, etc. We design and implement this system, as well as conduct a preliminary user study and analyze the results, which can guide a better design of AR-Maze. With this work, we intend to help children programming in an interesting and intuitive way.

References

1. David Bouchard and Steve Daniels. 2015. Tiles that Talk: Tangible Templates for Networked Objects. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '15). ACM, 197--200.
2. Joshua Chan, Tarun Pondicherry, and Paulo Blikstein. 2013. LightUp: an augmented, learning platform for electronics. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '13). ACM, 491--494.
3. Sidhant Goyal, Rohan S. Vijay, Charu Monga, and Pratul Kalita. 2016. Code Bits: An Inexpensive Tangible Computational Thinking Toolkit For K-12 Curriculum. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, 441--447.
4. Michael S. Horn and Robert J. K. Jacob. 2007. Designing tangible programming languages for classroom use. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (TEI '07). ACM, 159--162.
5. Heller S. The meaning of children in culture becomes a focal point for scholars. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1998: A14 -A16.
6. Valentin Heun, Shunichi Kasahara, and Pattie Maes. 2013. Smarter objects: using AR technology to program physical objects and their interactions. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, 2817--2818.
7. Stéphane Magnenat, Morderchai Ben-Ari, Severin Klinger, and Robert W. Sumner. 2015. Enhancing Robot Programming with Visual Feedback and Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '15). ACM, 153--158.
8. Timothy S. McNerney. 2004. From turtles to Tangible Programming Bricks: explorations in physical language design. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 8, 5 (September 2004), 326--337.
9. Qualcomm Vuforia, http://www.qualcomm.com/Vuforia
10. Iulian Radu and Blair MacIntyre. 2009. Augmented-reality scratch: a children's authoring environment for augmented-reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '09). ACM, 210--213.
11. TopCode: Tangible Object Placement Codes. DOI: http: //hci.cs.tufts.edu/topcodes/
12. Danli Wang, Cheng Zhang, and Hongan Wang. 2011. T-Maze: a tangible programming tool for children. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '11). ACM, 127--135.
13. Danli Wang, Lan Zhang, Chao Xu, Haichen Hu, and Yunfeng Qi. 2016. A Tangible Embedded Programming System to Convey Event-Handling Concept. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, 133--140.
14. Wing, Jeannette M. "Computational thinking." Communications of the ACM 49.3 (2006): 33--35.

• Computing methodologies

  • Computer graphics

    • Graphics systems and interfaces

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction paradigms