skip to main content
10.1145/3203217.3203270acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Horizon: a multi-abstraction framework for graph analytics

Published:08 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

A graph application written using a distributed graph processing framework can perform over an order of magnitude slower than its high-performance, native counterpart. This issue stems from the aim, common to most graph frameworks, of restricting the scope of application development to specific graph constructs, such as, for example, vertex or edge programs.

In this paper we present Horizon, a distributed graph processing framework achieving close to native performance without penalizing productivity by providing a multi-layer, multi-abstraction model of computation. Compared to current frameworks, Horizon extends the scope of computation by exposing two notions usually relegated to implementations: graph data models and communication models. Horizon can reduce execution time by an average of 5.3× across different applications and datasets and process an order of magnitude larger graphs when compared to the state of the art.

References

  1. Scott Beamer, Krste Asanović, and David Patterson. 2012. Direction-optimizing Breadth-first Search. In Proceedings of the International Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC '12). IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, Article 12, 10 pages. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2388996.2389013 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aydin Buluc and John R Gilbert. 2011. The Combinatorial BLAS: Design, Implementation, and Applications. Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl. 25, 4 (Nov. 2011), 496--509. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Joseph E. Gonzalez, Reynold S. Xin, Ankur Dave, Daniel Crankshaw, Michael J. Franklin, and Ion Stoica. 2014. GraphX: Graph Processing in a Distributed Dataflow Framework. In 11th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 14). USENIX Association, Broomfield, CO, 599--613. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Grzegorz Malewicz, Matthew H. Austern, Aart J.C Bik, James C. Dehnert, Ilan Horn, Naty Leiser, and Grzegorz Czajkowski. 2010. Pregel: A System for Large-scale Graph Processing. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 135--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Frank McSherry, Michael Isard, and Derek G. Murray. 2015. Scalability! But at what COST?. In 15th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS XV). USENIX Association, Kartause Ittingen, Switzerland. https://www.usenix.org/conference/hotos15/workshop-program/presentation/mcsherry Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Sujith Ravi. 2016. Graph-powered Machine Learning at Google. (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0922Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Jiwon Seo, Jongsoo Park, M. Amber Hassaan, Shubho Sengupta, Zhaoming Yin, and Pradeep Dubey. 2014. Navigating the Maze of Graph Analytics Frameworks Using Massive Graph Datasets. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 979--990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Narayanan Sundaram, Nadathur Satish, Md Mostofa Ali Patwary, Subramanya R. Dulloor, Michael J. Anderson, Satya Gautam Vadlamudi, Dipankar Das, and Pradeep Dubey. 2015. GraphMat: High Performance Graph Analytics Made Productive. Proc. VLDB Endow. 8, 11 (July 2015), 1214--1225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Matei Zaharia, Mosharaf Chowdhury, Tathagata Das, Ankur Dave, Justin Ma, Murphy McCauley, Michael J. Franklin, Scott Shenker, and Ion Stoica. 2012. Resilient Distributed Datasets: A Fault-tolerant Abstraction for In-memory Cluster Computing. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI'12). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2--2. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2228298.2228301 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Xiaowei Zhu, Wenguang Chen, Weimin Zheng, and Xiaosong Ma. 2016. Gemini: A Computation-Centric Distributed Graph Processing System. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16). USENIX Association, GA, 301-316. https://www.usenix.org/conference/osdi16/technical-sessions/presentation/zhu Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CF '18: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers
    May 2018
    401 pages
    ISBN:9781450357616
    DOI:10.1145/3203217

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 May 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate240of680submissions,35%

    Upcoming Conference

    CF '24
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader