ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Confined types
Full text PdfPdf (1.71 MB)
Source Conference on Object Oriented Programming Systems Languages and Applications archive
Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications table of contents
Denver, Colorado, United States
Pages: 82 - 96  
Year of Publication: 1999
ISBN:1-58113-238-7
Also published in ...
Authors
Jan Vitek  Purdue University, Dept. of Computer Sciences
Boris Bokowski  Freie Universität Berlin, GMD-FIRST Berlin, Germany
Sponsor
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 30,   Citation Count: 21
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/320384.320392
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sharing and transfer of object references is difficult to control in object-oriented languages. Unconstrained sharing poses serious problems for writing secure components in object-oriented languages. In this paper, we present a set of inexpensive syntactic constraints that strengthen encapsulation in object-oriented programs and facilitate the implementation of secure systems. We introduce two mechanisms: confined types to impose static scoping on dynamic object references and, for technical reasons, anonymous methods which are methods that do not reveal the identity of the current instance (this). Confined types protect objects from use by untrusted code, while anonymous methods allow standard classes to be reused from confined classes. We have implemented a verifier which performs a modular analysis of Java programs and provides a static guarantee that confinement is respected. We present security related programming examples.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. S. Almeida. Balloon types: Controlling sharing of state in data types. In M. Aksit and S. Matsuoka, editors, ECO OP '97--Object-Oriented Programming, 11th European Conference, volume 1241 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 32-59, Jyv~kyl~i, Finland, 9-13 June 1997. Springer.
2
 
3
 
4
J. Boyland. Deferring destruction when reading unique variables. Technical report, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee~ Mar. 1999.
5
 
6
J. Chase, H. Levy, M. Baker-Harvey, and E. Lazowska. Opal: A single address space system for 64-bit architectures. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, pages 80-85, 1993.
7
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
L. Gong. Java security architecture (JDK 1.2). Technical report, JavaSoft, July 1997. Revision 0.5.
 
12
L. Gong. Guarding objects. In G. Vigna, editor, Mobile Agents and Security, volume 576 of LNCS, pages 1-23, Berlin, Germany, Aug. 1998. Springer.
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
C. Hawblitzel, C.-C. Chang, G. Czajkowski, D. Hu, and T. von Eicken. Implementing Multiple Protection Domains in Java. Technical Report 97-1660, Cornell University, Department of Computer Science, 1997.
17
18
19
 
20
S. Kent and i. Maung. Encapsulation and Aggregation. In Proceedings of TOOLS PACIFIC 95 (TOOLS 18). Prentice Hall, 1995.
21
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
S. Lucco, O. Sharp, and R. Wahbe. Omniware: A Universal Substrate for Web Programming. World Wide Web Journal, 1(1):359-368, Dec. 1995.
 
26
J. McLean. Security models. In J. Marciniak, editor, Encyclopedia of Software Engineering. Wiley & Sons, 1994.
27
28
 
29
A. C. Myers and B. Liskov. Complete, safe information flow with decentralized labels. In Proceedings oj' the 1998 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Oakland, California, pages 186-197, 1998.
 
30
31
 
32
 
33
J. C. Riecke and C. A. Stone. Privacy via Subsumption. In Fifth Workshop on Foundations o~ Object-Oriented Languages, 1998.
34
 
35
Secure Internet Programming Group. http://www.cs- .princeton.edu/sip/news/apri129.html. 1997.
36
 
37
 
38
 
39
F. Tip, C. Laffra, P. F. Sweeney, and D. Streeter. Size matters: Reducing the size of java class file archives. Technical report, IBM Research Report RC 21321, Oct. 1998.
 
40
J. Vitek and C. Bryce. Secure mobile code: the JavaSeal experiment. Manuscript, 1999.
 
41
J. Vitek, M. Serrano, and D. Thanos. Security and communication in mobile object systems. In D. Tsichritzis, editor, Objects at Large. University of Geneva, 1997.
 
42
D. Volpano and G. Smith. A type-based approach to program security. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1214~ 1997.
43
44
 
45
F. Yellin. Low level security in Java. In Fourth lnternational Conference on ~he World-Wide Web, MIT, Boston, Dec. 1995.

CITED BY  21
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jan Vitek: colleagues
Boris Bokowski: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: