ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Minimum cost selection of secondary indexes for formatted files
Full text PdfPdf (1.74 MB)
Source ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 1  (March 1977) table of contents
Pages: 68 - 90  
Year of Publication: 1977
ISSN:0362-5915
Authors
Henry D. Anderson  Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, NY
P. Bruce Berra  Syracuse Univ., Syracuse, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 28,   Citation Count: 22
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/320521.320537
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Secondary indexes are often used in database management systems for secondary key retrieval. Although their use can improve retrieval time significantly, the cost of index maintenance and storage increases the overhead of the file processing application. The optimal set of indexed secondary keys for a particular application depends on a number of application dependent factors. In this paper a cost function is developed for the evaluation of candidate indexing choices and applied to the optimization of index selection. Factors accounted for include file size, the relative rates of retrieval and maintenance and the distribution of retrieval and maintenance over the candidate keys, index structure, and system charging rates. Among the results demonstrated are the increased effectiveness of secondary indexes for large files, the effect of the relative rates of retrieval and maintenance, the greater cost of allowing for arbitrarily formulated queries, and the impact on cost of the use of different index structures.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
BOOKMAN, P.J. Make your users pay the price. Computer Decisions 4 (Sept. 1972), 28-31.
3
 
4
CODASYL SYSTEMS COMMITTEE. A survey of generalized data base management systems. ACM, New York, May 1969.
5
 
6
DELOBEL, C. Determination of an optimal set of secondary keys for formatted files. ONLINE 72, Int. Symp. and Exhib. of Online Interactive Comptng, Brunel U., Uxbridge, England, Sept. 1972.
 
7
IBM System/370 Model 155 Functional Characteristics. GA22-6942-1, IBM Corp., White Plains, N.Y., 1971.
 
8
JONES, W.J. Syracuse University Computing Center charges. Document C64-0495, Syracuse U. Comptng. Ctr. Inform. SET., Syracuse U., Syracuse, N.Y., Feb. 1972.
 
9
KING~ W.F. On the Selection of indices for a file. IBM Res. Rep. RJ 1341, IBM Res. Lab., San Jose, Calif., Jan. 1974.
 
10
KNUTtt, D.E. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 3: Searching and Sorting. Addison Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1973.
11
12
13
14
 
15
WEBB, D.A. Evaluation of hash coding systems. Ph.D. Th., SIS Dept., Syracuse U., Syracuse, N.Y., Aug. 1972.

CITED BY  22
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Henry D. Anderson: colleagues
P. Bruce Berra: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: