skip to main content
10.1145/3205326.3205348acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescasaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Socio-Cultural Effects of Virtual Counseling Interviewers as Mediated by Smartphone Video Conferencing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We explored how users perceive virtual characters that performed the role of a counseling interviewer, while presenting different levels of social class, as well as single or multi-tasking behavior. To investigate this subject, we designed a 2x2 experiment (tasking type and social class of the virtual counseling interviewer). In the experiment, participants experienced the counseling interview interactions over video conferencing on a smartphone. We measured user responses to and perceptions of the virtual human interviewer. The results demonstrate that the tasking types and social class of the virtual counselor affected user responses to and perceptions of the virtual counselor. The results offer insight into the design and development of effective, realistic, and believable virtual human counselors. Furthermore, the results also address current social questions about how smartphones might mediate social interactions, including human-agent interactions.

References

  1. Ames, M. G. (2013). Managing mobile multitasking: The culture of iPhones on Stanford campus. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1487--1498). New York, NY: ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. & Etgar, S. (2016). Intimacy and Smartphone Multitasking---A New Oxymoron? Psychological Reports, Vol. 119(3), pp. 826--838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bickmore, T., Mauer, D., & Brown, T. (2009). Context Awareness in a Handheld Exercise Agent. Pervasive and Mobile Computing special issue on Pervasive Health and Wellness, Vol. 5, pp. 226--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bickmore, T., Mauer, D., Crespo, F., & Brown, T. (2007). Persuasion, Task Interruption and Health Regimen Adherence. Persuasive Technology '07, Stanford, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Carkhuff, R. R. & Pierce. R. (1967). Differential effects of therapist race and social class upon patient depth of self-exploration in the initial clinical interview. Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol. 31(6), pp. 632--634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ciardo, F., Marino, B. F. M., Rossetti, A., Actis-Grosso, R., & Ricciardelli, P. (2013). Face age and social status exert different modulatory effects on gaze following behavior. In book: Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics, Publisher: Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, Editors: eds M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, I. Wachsmuth, pp. 2058--2063.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook, J. M. & Lawson, G. (2015). Counselors' social class and socioeconomic status understanding and awareness. Journal of Counseling & Development, Vol. 94, pp. 442--453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Foulsham, T., Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Henrich, J., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117, pp. 319--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Gobel, M. S., Kim, H. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2015). The dual function of social gaze. Cognition, 136, pp. 359--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelly, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 79--94). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang S., Krum, D., Khooshabeh, P., Phan, T., Kevin Chang, C., Amir, O., & Lin, R. (2017). Social Influence of Humor in Virtual Human Counselor's Self-Disclosure. Journal of Computer Animation and Virtual Words 28(3-4):e1763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kang, S., Watt, J. H., & Ala, S. K. (2008). Social copresence in anonymous social interactions using a mobile video telephone. In Proc. Computer-Human Interaction. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lee, Y.-K., Chang, C.-T., Lin, Y., and Cheng, Z.-H. (2014). The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, pp. 373--383. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Matsunaga M. (2010). How to Factor-Analyze Your Data Right: Do's, Don'ts, and How-To's. Int'l Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), pp. 97--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Socio-Cultural Effects of Virtual Counseling Interviewers as Mediated by Smartphone Video Conferencing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CASA 2018: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents
      May 2018
      101 pages
      ISBN:9781450363761
      DOI:10.1145/3205326

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      © 2018 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 May 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      CASA 2018 Paper Acceptance Rate18of110submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate18of110submissions,16%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader