skip to main content
10.1145/3205455.3205575acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A set-oriented MOEA/D

Published: 02 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

The working principles of the well-established multi-objective evolutionary algorithm Moea/d relies on the iterative and cooperative improvement of a number of single-objective sub-problems obtained by decomposition. Besides the definition of sub-problems, selection and replacement are, like in any evolutionary algorithm, the two core elements of Moea/d. We argue that these two components are however loosely coupled with the maintained population. Thereby, we propose to re-design the working principles of Moea/d by adopting a set-oriented perspective, where a many-to-one mapping between sub-problems and solutions is considered. Selection is then performed by defining a neighborhood relation among solutions in the population set, depending on the corresponding sub-problem mapping. Replacement is performed following an elitist mechanism allowing the population to have a variable, but bounded, cardinality during the search process. By conducting a comprehensive empirical analysis on a range of combinatorial multi- and many-objective NK-landscapes, we show that the proposed approach leads to significant improvements, especially when dealing with an increasing number of objectives. Our findings indicate that a set-oriented design can constitute a sound alternative for strengthening the practice of multi- and many-objective evolutionary optimization based on decomposition.

References

[1]
H. E. Aguirre and Kiyoshi Tanaka. 2007. Working principles, behavior, and performance of MOEAs on MNK-landscapes. EJOR 181, 3 (2007), 1670--1690.
[2]
Nicola Beume, Boris Naujoks, and Michael Emmerich. 2007. SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. European Journal of Operational Research 181, 3 (2007), 1653--1669.
[3]
K. Deb, S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, and T. Meyarivan. 2002. A Fast and Elitist Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 2 (2002), 182--197.
[4]
Ioannis Giagkiozis, Robin C. Purshouse, and Peter J. Fleming. 2013. Generalized Decomposition. In Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. 428--442.
[5]
E. J. Hughes. 2003. Multiple Single Objective Pareto Sampling. In CEC. 2678--2684.
[6]
S. A. Kauffman. 1993. The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press.
[7]
J. Knowles, L. Thiele, and E. Zitzler. 2006. A Tutorial on the Performance Assessment of Stochastic Multiobjective Optimizers. TIK Report 214. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
[8]
H. Li and Q. Zhang. 2009. Multiobjective Optimization Problems With Complicated Pareto Sets, MOEA/D and NSGA-II. IEEE TEC 13, 2 (2009), 284--302.
[9]
K. Li, Q. Zhang, S. Kwong, M. Li, and R. Wang. 2014. Stable Matching-Based Selection in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. IEEE TEC 18, 6 (2014), 909--923.
[10]
Gauvain Marquet, Bilel Derbel, Arnaud Liefooghe, and El-Ghazali Talbi. 2014. Shake Them All! Rethinking Selection and Replacement in MOEA/D. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN XIII. 641--651.
[11]
Saúl Zapotecas Martínez, Hernán E. Aguirre, Kiyoshi Tanaka, and Carlos A. Coello Coello. 2015. On the low-discrepancy sequences and their use in MOEA/D for high-dimensional objective spaces. In CEC. 2835--2842.
[12]
K. Miettinen. 1999. Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization. Kluwer.
[13]
Hugo Monzón, Hernán Aguirre, Sébastien Verel, Arnaud Liefooghe, Bilel Derbel, and Kiyoshi Tanaka. 2017. Closed State Model for Understanding the Dynamics of MOEAs. In GECCO. 609--616.
[14]
Tadahiko Murata, Hisao Ishibuchi, and Mitsuo Gen. 2000. Cellular Genetic Local Search for Multi-objective Optimization. In GECCO. 307--314.
[15]
L. Paquete, M. Chiarandini, and T. Stützle. 2004. Pareto Local Optimum Sets in the Biobjective Traveling Salesman Problem: An Experimental Study. In Metaheuristics for Multiobjective Optimization. Chapter 7, 177--199.
[16]
A. Trivedi, D. Srinivasan, K. Sanyal, and A. Ghosh. 2017. A Survey of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Decomposition. IEEE TEC 21, 3 (2017), 440--462.
[17]
Sébastien Verel, Arnaud Liefooghe, Laetitia Jourdan, and Clarisse Dhaenens. 2013. On the structure of multiobjective combinatorial search space: MNK-landscapes with correlated objectives. EJOR 227, 2 (2013), 331--342.
[18]
Z. Wang, Q. Zhang, A. Zhou, M. Gong, and L. Jiao. 2016. Adaptive Replacement Strategies for MOEA/D. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics 46, 2 (2016), 474--486.
[19]
Qingfu Zhang and Hui Li. 2007. MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition. IEEE TEC 11, 6 (2007), 712--731.
[20]
Eckart Zitzler and Simon Künzli. 2004. Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search. In Parallel Problem Solving from Nature-PPSN VIII. 832--842.
[21]
E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, and J. Bader. 2010. On Set-Based Multiobjective Optimization. IEEE TEC 14, 1 (2010), 58--79.
[22]
E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C. M. Fonseca, and V. Grunert da Fonseca. 2003. Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review. IEEE TEC 7, 2 (2003), 117--132.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
GECCO '18: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
July 2018
1578 pages
ISBN:9781450356183
DOI:10.1145/3205455
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 02 July 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. combinatorial optimization
  2. decomposition
  3. evolutionary algorithms
  4. multi- and many-objective optimization

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

GECCO '18
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,669 of 4,410 submissions, 38%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 116
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 02 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media