skip to main content
10.1145/3209626.3209627acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Social Media and Public Discourse: A Technology Affordance Perspective on Use of Social Media Features

Published:18 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present the proposal for a research study that aims at explaining the consequences of social media use on mass media content and public discourse. Social media is defined as a set of networked communication platforms that enable generation, distribution and consumption of user generated content. Technology features of the social media platforms are at the center of our analysis. The use of social media features is conceptualized using technology affordance theory. Borrowing from mass communication literature, we argue that media content is produced as a result of a dialectical relationship between media discourse and public opinion. The consequences of social media use on public discourse are conceptualized in terms of the changes in the dialectics between media discourse and public opinion resulting from the use of social media. Two types of public discourses are identified. We develop theory from extant literature to arrive at proposition on consequences of use of specific social media features on the media content and public discourse. Propositions are presented both for the general public discourse case and the context of particular type of discourses. We conclude this proposal by discussing the potential contributions of our study.

References

  1. Otto Santa Ana. 1999. Like an animal I was treated': Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & society Vol. 10, 2 (1999), 191--224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sinan Aral and Dylan Walker. 2011. Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management science Vol. 57, 9 (2011), 1623--1639. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic, Robert D Galliers, Ola Henfridsson, Sue Newell, and Richard Vidgen. 2014. The sociomateriality of information systems: current status, future directions. Mis Quarterly Vol. 38, 3 (2014), 809--830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. William H DeLone and Ephraim R McLean. 1992. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research Vol. 3, 1 (1992), 60--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gerardine DeSanctis and Marshall Scott Poole. 1994. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science Vol. 5, 2 (1994), 121--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Nicole B Ellison et almbox.. 2007. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer-mediated Communication Vol. 13, 1 (2007), 210--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nicole B Ellison and Danah M Boyd. 2013. Sociality through social network sites. In The Oxford handbook of internet studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Robert M Entman. 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication Vol. 43, 4 (1993), 51--58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Norman Fairclough. 1993. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society Vol. 4, 2 (1993), 133--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Samer Faraj and Bijan Azad. 2012. The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (2012), 237--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. William A Gamson, David Croteau, William Hoynes, and Theodore Sasson. 1992. Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual review of sociology Vol. 18, 1 (1992), 373--393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. William A Gamson and Kathryn E Lasch. 1981. The political culture of social welfare policy. (1981).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. William A Gamson and Andre Modigliani. 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American journal of sociology Vol. 95, 1 (1989), 1--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. JJ Gibson. 1979. The theory of affordances The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (pp. 127--143). (1979).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Raghuram Iyengar, Christophe Van den Bulte, and Thomas W Valente. 2011. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Science Vol. 30, 2 (2011), 195--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Matthew Jones. 2014. A Matter of Life and Death: Exploring Conceptualizations of Sociomateriality in the Context of Critical Care. Mis Quarterly Vol. 38, 3 (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Matthew R Jones and Helena Karsten. 2008. Giddens's structuration theory and information systems research. MIS quarterly Vol. 32, 1 (2008), 127--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gerald Kane, Maryam Alavi, Giuseppe Labianca, and Steve Borgatti. 2014. What's different about social media networks? A framework and research agenda. MIS quarterly (2014), 275--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Anat Klin and Dafna Lemish. 2008. Mental disorders stigma in the media: Review of studies on production, content, and influences. Journal of health communication Vol. 13, 5 (2008), 434--449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Paul M Leonardi. 2011. When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS quarterly (2011), 147--167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Paul M Leonardi. 2013. When does technology use enable network change in organizations? A comparative study of feature use and shared affordances. MIS quarterly (2013), 749--775. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Ann Majchrzak, Samer Faraj, Gerald C Kane, and Bijan Azad. 2013. The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication Vol. 19, 1 (2013), 38--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. M Lynne Markus and Mark S Silver. 2008. A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the Association for Information systems Vol. 9, 10/11 (2008), 609.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaila M Miranda, Amber Young, and Emre Yetgin. 2016. Are social media emancipatory or hegemonic? Societal effects of mass media digitization. MIS Quarterly Vol. 40, 2 (2016), 303--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Matthew C Nisbet. 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and policy for sustainable development Vol. 51, 2 (2009), 12--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Donald A Norman. 1999. Affordance, conventions, and design. interactions Vol. 6, 3 (1999), 38--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Onook Oh, Manish Agrawal, and H Raghav Rao. 2013. Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of tweets during social crises. Mis Quarterly Vol. 37, 2 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Onook Oh, Chanyoung Eom, and H Raghav Rao. 2015. Research note-Role of social Media in Social Change: An analysis of collective sense making during the 2011 Egypt revolution. Information Systems Research Vol. 26, 1 (2015), 210--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wanda J Orlikowski. 2007. Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization studies Vol. 28, 9 (2007), 1435--1448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Wanda J Orlikowski. 2010. The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge journal of economics Vol. 34, 1 (2010), 125--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wanda J Orlikowski and Susan V Scott. 2008. 10 sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals Vol. 2, 1 (2008), 433--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Fay Cobb Payton and Lynette Kvasny. 2016. Online HIV awareness and technology affordance benefits for black female collegians-maybe not: the case of stigma. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Vol. 23, 6 (2016), 1121--1126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ann Swidler. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American sociological review (1986), 273--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kjerstin Thorson and Chris Wells. 2016. Curated flows: A framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Communication Theory Vol. 26, 3 (2016), 309--328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Emmanuelle Vaast, Hani Safadi, Liette Lapointe, and Bogdan Negoita. 2017. Social media affordances for conective action: An examination of microblogging use during the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quarterly Vol. 41, 4 (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Sebastián Valenzuela, Namsu Park, and Kerk F Kee. 2009. Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of computer-mediated communication Vol. 14, 4 (2009), 875--901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Olga Volkoff and Diane M Strong. 2013. Critical Realism and Affordances: Theorizing IT-associated Organizational Change Processes. Mis Quarterly Vol. 37, 3 (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Social Media and Public Discourse: A Technology Affordance Perspective on Use of Social Media Features

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMIS-CPR'18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research
      June 2018
      216 pages
      ISBN:9781450357685
      DOI:10.1145/3209626

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader