Senthilkumar Thangavelu
- Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation?: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly. 45, 3 (2000), 425--455.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Ajila, S.A. and Wu, D. 2007. Empirical study of the effects of open source adoption on software development economics. Journal of Systems and Software. 80, 9 (2007), 1517--1529. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexy, O. et al. 2013. From closed to open: Job role changes, individual predispositions, and the adoption of commercial open source software development. Research Policy. 42, 8 (2013), 1325--1340.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Almirall, E. and Casadesus-Masanell, R. 2010. OPEN VERSUS CLOSED INNOVATION: A MODEL OF DISCOVERY AND DIVERGENCE. Academy of Management Review. 35, 1 (2010), 27--47.Google Scholar
- Appleyard, M.M. and Chesbrough, H.W. 2017. The Dynamics of Open Strategy: From Adoption to Reversion. Long Range Planning. 50, 3 (2017), 310--321.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arora, A. et al. 2016. The paradox of openness revisited: Collaborative innovation and patenting by UK innovators. Research Policy. 45, 7 (2016), 1352--1361.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ayala, C.P. et al. 2011. Five Facts on the Adoption of Open Source Software. IEEE Software. 28, 2 (2011), 95--99. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beckman, C.M. and Haunschild, P.R. 2002. Network Learning: The Effects of Partners' Heterogeneity of Experience on Corporate Acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly. 47, 1 (2002), 92--124.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van den Bosch, F. a. J. et al. 1999. Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science. 10, 5 (1999), 551--568. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. 1990. Absorptive Capacity?: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative science quarterly. 35, 1 (1990), 128--152.Google Scholar
- Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. 1989. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal.Google Scholar
- Dahlander, L. and Magnusson, M. 2008. How do Firms Make Use of Open Source Communities? Long Range Planning. 41, 6 (2008), 629--649.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease Of Use, And User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 13, 3 (1989), 319--339. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DeCarolis, D.M. and Deeds, D.L. 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal. 20, 10 (1999), 953--968.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DePietro, R. et al. 1990. The context for change: Organization, technology and environment. The processes of technological innovation. L.G. Tornatzky and M. Fleischer, eds. Lexington Books. 151--175.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald, B. 2009. Anatomy of Success and Failure Open Source Software Adoption. International Journal of Open Source Software Processes. 1, March (2009), 1--23.Google Scholar
- Fosfuri, A. and Tribó, J.A. 2008. Exploring the antecedents of potential absorptive capacity and its impact on innovation performance. Omega. 36, 2 (2008), 173--187.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Franco-Bedoya, O. et al. 2017. Open Source Software Ecosystems: A Systematic Mapping. Information and Software Technology. 0, Manuscript submitted for publication. (2017), 1--26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gallego, M.D. et al. 2008. User acceptance model of open source software. Computers in Human Behavior. 24, 5 (2008), 2199--2216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Glynn, E. et al. 2005. Commercial adoption of open source software: An empirical study. 2005 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, ISESE 2005 (2005), 225--234.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Granovetter, M. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78, 6 (1973), 1360--1380.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grossman, S.J. and Hart, O.D. 1986. The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration. Journal of Political Economy. 94, 4 (1986), 691.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gwebu, K.L. and Wang, J. 2011. Adoption of open source software: The role of social identification. Decision Support Systems. 51, 1 (2011), 220--229. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hansen, M.T. 2002. Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies. Organization Science. 13, 3 (2002), 232--248. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hansen, M.T. et al. 2005. Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal. 48, 5 (2005), 776--793.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harison, E. and Koski, H. 2010. Applying open innovation in business strategies: Evidence from Finnish software firms. Research Policy. 39, 3 (2010), 351--359.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hart, O. and Moore, J. 1990. Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm. The Journal of Political Economy. 98, 6 (1990), 1119.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hauge, Ø. et al. 2008. Adoption of open source in the software industry. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Open Source Development, Communities and Quality. 275, (2008), 211--221.Google Scholar
- Hauge, Ø. et al. 2010. Adoption of open source software in software-intensive organizations - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology. 52, 11 (2010), 1133--1154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Inkpen, A.C. and Tsang, E.W.K. 2005. Social Capital, Networks and Knowledge Transfer. Academy of Management Review. 30, 1 (2005), 146--165.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jansen, J.J.P. et al. 2005. Managing Potential and Realised Absorptive Capacity: How do Organisational Antecedents Matter? Academy of Management Journal. 48, 6 (2005), 999--1015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jyotishi, A. et al. 2017. Gold Mining Institutions in Nilgiri -- Wayanad A Historical-Institutional Perspective. Economic and Political Weekly. LII, 28 (2017), 57--63.Google Scholar
- Katila, R. and Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal. 45, 6 (2002), 1183--1194.Google Scholar
- Khoja, F. and Maranville, S. 2009. The power of intrafirm networks. Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 8, (2009), 51--70.Google Scholar
- Lane, P.J. et al. 2001. Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal. 22, 12 (2001), 1139--1161.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lane, P.J. et al. 2006. THE REIFICATION OF ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND REJUVENATION OF THE CONSTRUCT. Academy of Management Review. 31, 4 (2006), 833--863.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, C. and Pennings, J. 2001. Internal Capabilities, External Networks, and Performance?: A Study on Technology- Based Ventures. Strategic Management Journal. 22, (2001), 615--640.Google Scholar
- Lerner, J. and Tirole, J. 2002. SOME SIMPLE ECONOMICS OF OPEN SOURCE. The Journal of Industrial Economics. 50, 2 (2002), 197--234.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lewis, J.A. 2010. Government Open Source Policies.Google Scholar
- LI, Q. et al. 2010. Top Management Attention to Innovation?: The Role of Search Selection and Intensity in New Product Introductions. Academy of Management Journal. (2010).Google Scholar
- Li, Y. et al. 2013. It is all about what we have: A discriminant analysis of organizations' decision to adopt open source software. Decision Support Systems. 56, 1 (2013), 56--62.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lichtenthaler, U. 2009. ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY, ENVIRONMENTAL TURBULENCE, AND THE COMPLEMENTARITY OF ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING PROCESSES. Academy of Management Journal. 52, 4 (2009), 822--846.Google ScholarCross Ref
- van Loon, A. and Toshkov, D. 2015. Adopting open source software in public administration: The importance of boundary spanners and political commitment. Government Information Quarterly. 32, 2 (2015), 207--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margan, D. and Čandrlić, S. 2015. The success of open source software: A review. MIPRO (2015), 1463--1468.Google Scholar
- Marsan, J. et al. 2012. Adoption of open source software in organizations: A socio-cognitive perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 21, 4 (2012), 257--273. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marsan, J. et al. 2012. Has open source software been institutionalized in organizations or not? Information and Software Technology. 54, 12 (2012), 1308--1316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morgan, L. and Finnegan, P. 2014. Beyond free software: An exploration of the business value of strategic open source. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 23, 3 (2014), 226--238. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mowery, D.C. et al. 1996. Strategic Alliances and Interfirm Knowledge Transfer. Strategic Management Journal. 17, Winter Special Issue (1996), 77--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Piva, E. et al. 2012. Is Open Source Software about Innovation? Collaborations with the Open Source Community and Innovation Performance of Software Entrepreneurial Ventures. Journal of Small Business Management. 50, 2 (2012), 340--364.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qi Dong, J. et al. 2017. How Central Is Too Central? Organizing Interorganizational Collaboration Networks for Breakthrough Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 34, 4 (2017), 526--542.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qu, W.G. et al. 2011. Multi-level framework of open source software adoption. Journal of Business Research. 64, 9 (2011), 997--1003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rogers, E.M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations 3rd Edition.Google Scholar
- Rothaermel, F.T. and Alexandre, M.T. 2009. Ambidexterity in Technology Sourcing: The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Organization Science. 20, 4 (2009), 759--780. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sacks, M. 2015. Competition between Open Source and Proprietary Software: Strategies for Survival. Journal of Management Information Systems. 32, 3 (2015), 268--295.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saunders, M. et al. 2009. Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
- Sen, R. et al. 2011. Open source software licenses: Strong-copyleft, non-copyleft, or somewhere in between? Decision Support Systems. 52, 1 (2011), 199--206. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Singh, J. 2005. Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns. Management Science. 51, 5 (2005), 756--770. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Spinellis, D. and Giannikas, V. 2012. Organizational adoption of open source software. Journal of Systems and Software. 85, 3 (2012), 666--682. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Spithoven, A. et al. 2011. Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries. Technovation. 31, 1 (2011), 10--21.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stam, W. 2009. When does community participation enhance the performance of open source software companies? Research Policy. 38, 8 (2009), 1288--1299.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sutanto, J. et al. 2014. Uncovering the relationship between OSS user support networks and OSS popularity. Decision Support Systems. 64, (2014), 142--151. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Szulanski, G. 1996. EXPLORING INTERNAL STICKINESS: IMPEDIMENTS TO THE TRANSFER OF BEST PRACTICE WITHIN THE FIRM. Strategic Management Journal. 17, 1 (1996), 27--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Teigland, R. et al. 2014. Balancing on a tightrope: Managing the boundaries of a firm-sponsored OSS community and its impact on innovation and absorptive capacity. Information and Organization. 24, 1 (2014), 25--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- The Tenth Annual Future of Open Source Survey: 2016. https://www.blackducksoftware.com/2016-future-of-open-source.Google Scholar
- Tiwana, A. 2008. DO BRIDGING TIES COMPLEMENT STRONG TIES? AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF ALLIANCE AMBIDEXTERITY. Strategic Management Journal. 29, (2008), 251--272.Google Scholar
- Todorova, G. and Durisin, B. 2007. ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: VALUING A RECONCEPTUALIZATION. Academy of Management Review. 32, 3 (2007), 774--786.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tsai, K.H. 2009. Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective. Research Policy. 38, 5 (2009), 765--778.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks?: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance Wenpin Tsai KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN INTRAORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS?: EFFECTS OF NETWORK POSITION AND ABSORPTIV. Academy of Management Journal. 44, 5 (2001), 996--1004.Google Scholar
- TSAI, W. 2001. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER IN INTRAORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS: EFFECTS OF NETWORK POSITION AND ABSORPTIVE GAPAGITY ON BUSINESS UNIT INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE. Academy of Management Journal. 44, 5 (2001), 996--1004.Google Scholar
- Tseng, C.-Y. et al. 2011. Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in KIBS. Journal of Knowledge Management. 15, 6 (2011), 971--983.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uzzi, B. 1997. Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly.Google Scholar
- Vasudeva, G. and Anand, J. 2011. Unpacking absoprtive capacity: A study of knoweldge utilization from alliance portfolios. Academy of Management Journal. 54, 3 (2011), 611--623.Google ScholarCross Ref
- WALES, W.J. et al. 2012. TOOMUCH OF A GOOD THING? ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY, FIRM PERFORMANCE, AND THE MODERATING ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION. Strategic Management Journal. (2012).Google Scholar
- Zaffar, M.A. et al. 2011. Diffusion dynamics of open source software: An agent-based computational economics (ACE) approach. Decision Support Systems. 51, 3 (2011), 597--608. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zahra, S.A. and George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review. 27, 2 (2002), 185--203.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Role of Absorptive Capacity, Knowledge Networks and Intellectual Property Rights in OSS Adoption of IT Firms: Doctoral Consortium Proposal
Recommendations
Factors Affecting the Development of Absorptive Capacity in the Adoption of Open Source Software
Previous research has shown that the knowledge that is available to an organization is an important factor influencing the adoption of open source software OSS. Hence, it is important that organizations develop their absorptive capacity in order to ...
Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities
This paper advances the understanding of absorptive capacity for assimilating new knowledge as a mediating variable of organization adaptation. Many scholars suggest a firm's absorptive capacity plays a key role in the process of coevolution (Lewin et ...
PERSPECTIVE---Absorbing the Concept of Absorptive Capacity: How to Realize Its Potential in the Organization Field
The purpose of this perspective paper is to advance understanding of absorptive capacity, its underlying dimensions, its multilevel antecedents, its impact on firm performance, and the contextual factors that affect absorptive capacity. Twenty years ...
Comments