skip to main content
10.1145/3209626.3209716acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Day in the Life: An Interactive Application to Introduce IT Students to the Workplace

Published:18 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Students can enter IT degrees with only a general idea of available career pathways and career options. Students often select an IT degree based on intrinsic interest in IT, however their career decisions can be based on misconceptions about the industry. The 'Day in the Life' application seeks to provide industry and career knowledge to first- and second-year IT students through an informative resource detailing the daily activities of various IT professionals, with a focus upon individual video interviews and organisation-related content. Usability testing was conducted to answer the question: to what level does this site alone change students' perspectives or understanding of day-to-day work in the IT industry? While revisions are recommended, overall student feedback indicates that the application has a positive effect on student knowledge, understanding, and career confidence.

References

  1. Biggs, J.B. and Tang, C. 2011. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Brush, T. and Saye, J. 2001. The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centred learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 10, 4 (2001), 333--356.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Department of Education and Training 2017. Higher Education Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dey, F. and Cruzvergara, C.Y. 2014. Evolution of Career Services in Higher Education. New Directions for Student Services. 2014, 148 (2014), 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Dillon, T.W. and Lending, D. 2014. Using Professional Consultants to Mentor CIS Students on a Simulated Consulting Project. Proceedings of the 52nd ACM conference on Computers and people research (2014), 171--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Druin, A. and Systems, A.C.M. 1999. Cooperative inquiry: Developing new technologies for children with children. Proceedings of ACM CHI 99 Conference on Human Factors in Computing. (1999), 223--230-NaN-0. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jackson, D. 2015. Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education. 40, 2 (2015), 350--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kori, K., Pedaste, M., Niitsoo, M., Kuusik, R., Altin, H., Tõnisson, E., Vau, I., Leijen, -., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L., Murtazin, K. and Paluoja, R. 2015. Why do Students Choose to Study Information and Communications Technology? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 191, (2015), 2867--2872.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lent, R.W.L., Brown, S.D., Talleyrand, R., McPartland, E.B., Davis, T., Chopra, S.B., Alexander, Michael S. Suthakaran,. and Chai, C.-M. 2002. Career Choice Barriers, Supports, and Coping Strategies: College Students' Experiences. Journal of Vocational Behaviour. 60, 1 (2002), 61--72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ma, E., Patiar, A. and Cox, R. 2014. Undergraduate Hotel Management Students' Perceptions of a Virtual Field Trip Website. CAUTHE 2014: Tourism and Hospitality in the Contemporary World: Trends, Changes and Complexity. (2014), 1005--1008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Potter, L.E. and Vickers, G. 2015. What skills do you need to work in cyber security? A look at the Australian market. SIGMIS-CPR 2015 - Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Procter, L. 2012. What is it about Field Trips? Praxis, Pedagogy and Presence in Virtual Environments. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 55, October (2012), 980--989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. QILT 2018. 2017 Employer Satisfaction Survey National Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. QILT 2018. 2017 Graduate Outcomes Survey.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. QILT 2018. 2017 Student Experience Survey National Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rubin, J. and Chisnell, D. 2011. Handbook of Usability Testing. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action. Temple Smith.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Simons, K.D. and Klein, J.D. 2007. The impact of scaffolding and student achievement levels in a problem-based learning environment. Instructional Science. 35, (2007), 41--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Day in the Life: An Interactive Application to Introduce IT Students to the Workplace

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGMIS-CPR'18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGMIS Conference on Computers and People Research
          June 2018
          216 pages
          ISBN:9781450357685
          DOI:10.1145/3209626

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 June 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader