skip to main content
10.1145/3209811.3209881acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompassConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing Appropriate Learning Technologies for School vs Home Settings in Tanzanian Rural Villages

Published:20 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smartphone- and tablet-based learning systems are often posited as solutions for closing early literacy gaps between rural and urban regions in emerging economies. These systems are often developed based on experiences with students in urban contexts, limiting their success rates with children from rural areas who have had little to no prior exposure to technology. To explore how such technologies are used in different learning contexts, we deployed an early literacy learning application in school and home settings in a rural village in Tanzania. We use Rogoff's theory of instructional models to understand and describe the interaction between learners, adults, and peers. We found that in the presence of a school teacher, the instructional model was primarily "adult-run" where information was almost entirely disseminated by the teacher, while in home settings, the instructional model was similar to a "community-of-learners" model where children collaborate with other peers and adults to achieve their learning goals. We use these instructional models to surface six themes of support and scaffolding that were expressed differently across settings, and discuss the benefits and drawbacks of the instructional models observed in providing support across these themes.

References

  1. Margarita Azmitia. 1996. Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues. Interactive minds: Life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition: 133--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Abhijit V. Banerjee, Shawn Cole, Esther Duflo, and Leigh Linden. 2007. Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, 3: 1235--1264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cynthia Breazeal, Robin Morris, Stephanie Gottwald, Tinsley Galyean, and Maryanne Wolf. 2016. Mobile devices for early literacy intervention and research with global reach. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pierre Dillenbourg and Patrick Jermann. 2010. Technology for classroom orchestration. In New science of learning. Springer, 525--552.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marcus Duveskog, Carolina Islas Sedano, and Erkki Sutinen. 2010. Working for my dreams-A Tanzanian OLPC experience. In IST-Africa, 2010, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Rosie Flewitt, David Messer, and Natalia Kucirkova. 2015. New directions for early literacy in a digital age: The iPad. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 15, 3: 289--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sharon Nelson-Le Gall. 1985. Chapter 2: Help-Seeking Behavior in Learning. Review of research in education 12, 1: 55--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles R. Greenwood. 1996. Research on the practices and behavior of effective teachers at the Juniper Gardens Children's Project: Implications for the education of diverse learners. Research on classroom ecologies: 39--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Willard W. Hartup. 1992. Having Friends, Making Friends, and Keeping Friends: Relationships as Educational Contexts. ERIC Digest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kenneth Holstein, Bruce M. McLaren, and Vincent Aleven. 2017. Intelligent tutors as teachers' aides: exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. John A. Hostetler and Gertrude Enders Huntington. 1971. Children in Amish Society: Socialization and Community Education. Case Studies in Education and Culture Series.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Anuj Kumar, Anuj Tewari, Geeta Shroff, Deepti Chittamuru, Matthew Kam, and John Canny. 2010. An exploratory study of unsupervised mobile learning in rural India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 743--752. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jerry Lipka and Barbara Adams. 2004. Culturally Based Math Education as a Way to Improve Alaska Native Students' Math Performance. Appalachian Collaborative Center for Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Marlaine E. Lockheed and Adriaan M. Verspoor. 1991. Improving primary education in developing countries. Oxford University Press for World Bank.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sharan B Merriam and Sharan B Merriam. 2009. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sugata Mitra, Ritu Dangwal, Shiffon Chatterjee, Swati Jha, Ravinder S. Bisht, and Preeti Kapur. 2005. Acquisition of computing literacy on shared public computers: Children and the" hole in the wall". Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 21, 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nancy Modiano. 1973. Indian education in the Chiapas highlands. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Aidan Mulkeen. 2005. Teachers for rural schools: A challenge for Africa. Africa region World Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Joe D. Nichols and Raymond B. Miller. 1994. Cooperative learning and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 19, 2: 167--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Judy M. Parr and Michael AR Townsend. 2002. Environments, processes, and mechanisms in peer learning. International journal of educational research 37, 5: 403--423.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Roy D. Pea. 1993. Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations 11: 47--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Roy D. Pea. 2004. The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The journal of the learning sciences 13, 3: 423--451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tony Read. 2015. Where have all the textbooks gone?: Toward sustainable provision of teaching and learning materials in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Bank Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Barbara Rogoff. 1994. Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, culture, and activity 1, 4: 209--229.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Barbara Rogoff, Ruth Paradise, Rebeca Mejía Arauz, Maricela Correa-Chávez, and Cathy Angelillo. 2003. Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual review of psychology 54, 1: 175--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rod D. Roscoe and Michelene TH Chi. 2008. Tutor learning: The role of explaining and responding to questions. Instructional Science 36, 4: 321--350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Sandra J. Stone and James F. Christie. 1996. Collaborative literacy learning during sociodramatic play in a multiage (K-2) primary classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education 10, 2: 123--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Ema Ushioda. 1996. Learner autonomy 5: The role of motivation. Authentik.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kathryn R. Wentzel. 1998. Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Journal of educational psychology 90, 2: 202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Kathryn R. Wentzel. 1999. Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. Journal of educational psychology 91, 1: 76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kathryn R. Wentzel. 2002. Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child development 73, 1: 287--301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yanhong Zhang. 2006. Urban-rural literacy gaps in Sub-Saharan Africa: The roles of socioeconomic status and school quality. Comparative Education Review 50, 4: 581--602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing Appropriate Learning Technologies for School vs Home Settings in Tanzanian Rural Villages

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      COMPASS '18: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
      June 2018
      472 pages
      ISBN:9781450358163
      DOI:10.1145/3209811

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate25of50submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader