ABSTRACT
The Participatory Design (PD) community is committed to continuously refine its technological, social, political, and scientific agenda, and as a result, PD has become more widely adopted, robust, and sophisticated. Yet, PD's advancement cannot end here. The gap between those who can contribute to the shaping of future technologies and those who are reduced to consumers, has - if anything - widened on a grand scale. In response, we argue through three lenses: scale, dialectics, and affect in PD, and suggest some pathways to build bridges, foster alliances, and evolve PD practice to proliferate the democratisation in technology design that has been a strong value driving PD. Scale asks about ways for PD to extend its reach without giving up on its core qualities. Dialectics is about creating and maintaining the spaces and fora for constructive conflict by networking and linking with other stakeholders, organisations, and domains. Finally, affect discusses how PD can put forward democratic visions of technological futures that connect to people's hearts, acknowledging that decisions are often made irrationally and unconsciously. Our review draws attention to opportunities for PD to travel between different contexts and proliferate through interconnected and intermediary knowledge and an embodied literacy that enables PD to reach further into industry, government, and community.
- Susanne Bødker and Morten Kyng. 2016. Challenging the Current State of PD and Looking Towards the Future of Participation. (Aug. 2016). http://pdc2016.orgGoogle Scholar
- Liam Bannon, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Susanne Bødker (Eds.). 2018. Special Issue on Reimagining Participatory Design of ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). ACM.Google Scholar
- Barry Brown, Susanne Bødker, and Kristina Höök. 2017. Does HCI Scale?: Scale Hacking and the Relevance of HCI. interactions 24, 5 (Aug. 2017), 28--33. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Gooch, Matthew Barker, Lorraine Hudson, Ryan Kelly, Gerd Kortuem, Janet Van Der Linden, Marian Petre, Rebecca Brown, Anna Klis-Davies, Hannah Forbes, Jessica Mackinnon, Robbie Macpherson, and Clare Walton. 2018. Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, 1 (2018), 2:1--2:34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mike Monteiro. 2017. Ethics can't be a side hustle. (2017). https://deardesignstudent.com/ethics-cant-be-a-side-hustle-b9e78c090aeeGoogle Scholar
- Carl DiSalvo. 2016. Introduction to Data, Design, and Civics: Ethnographic Perspectives. (2016). https://www.epicpeople.org/introduction-to-data-design-civics/Google Scholar
- Finn Kensing and Jeanette Blomberg. 1998. Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 7, 3--4 (1998), 167--185. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2016. Unpacking the Notion of Participation in Participatory Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 25, 6 (Dec. 2016), 425--475. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Ann Light, and Peter Wright. 2015. The beginnings, middles and endings of participatory research in HCI: An introduction to the special issue on 'perspectives on participation'. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (feb 2015), 77--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim Halskov and Nicolai Brodersen Hansen. 2015. The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002--2012. 74 (2015), 81--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Reason. 1998. Political, epistemological, ecological and spiritual dimensions of participation. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies 4, 2 (sep 1998), 147--167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eevi E. Beck. 2002. P for political: Participation is not enough. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 14, 1 (2002), 1.Google Scholar
- John Vines, Rachel Clarke, Peter Wright, John McCarthy, and Patrick Olivier. 2013. Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, 429--438. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adam Greenfield. 2017. Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life. Verso. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Dourish. 2016. Algorithms and their others: Algorithmic culture in context. Big Data & Society 3, 2 (aug 2016), 205395171666512.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hans Thomae. 1999. The Nomothetic-Idiographic Issue: Some Roots and Recent Trends. International Journal of Group Tensions 28, 1/2 (1999), 187--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2014. Disentangling Participation: Power and Decision-making in Participatory Design. Springer. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susanne Bødker, Pelle Ehn, John Kammersgaard, Morten Kyng, and Yngve Sundblad. 1987. A UTOPIAN experience: On design of powerful computer-based tools for skilled graphical workers. In Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge, Gro Bjerknes, Pelle Ehn, and Morten Kyng (Eds.). Aldershot, Avebury, UK, 251--278.Google Scholar
- Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements. CoDesign 8, 2--3 (June 2012), 127--144.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2001. Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects (1 edition ed.). Birkhäuser, Basel.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacques Ranciere. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. A&C Black.Google Scholar
- Claus Bossen. 2006. Participation, Power, Critique: Constructing a Standard for Electronic Patient Records. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design - Volume 1 (PDC '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 95--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Rust. 2004. Design Enquiry: Tacit Knowledge and Invention in Science. Design Issues 20, 4 (sep 2004), 76--85.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Finn Kensing and Joan Greenbaum. 2013. Heritage: Having a say. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson (Eds.). Routledge, 21--36.Google Scholar
- Kristen Nygaard and Olav Terje Bergo. 1975. The Trade Unions - New users of research. Personnel Review 4, 2 (1975), 5--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pelle Ehn. 1989. Work-oriented design of computer artifacts (2nd ed.). Arbetslivs-centrum, Stockholm, Sweden. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucy A. Suchman. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Terry Winograd and Fernando Flores. 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Addison-Wesley, Boston, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael J. Muller. 2003. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In The Human-computer Interaction Handbook, Julie A. Jacko and Andrew Sears (Eds.). L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1051--1068. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=772072.772138 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johannes Gärtner and Ina Wagner. 1996. Mapping actors and agendas: political frameworks of systems design and participation. Human-Computer Interaction 11, 3 (Sept. 1996), 187--214. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt. 1998. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems (Interactive Technologies). Academic Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ole Sejer Iversen, Kim Halskov, and Tuck W. Leong. 2010. Values-led participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 8, 2--3 (2010), 87--103.Google Scholar
- Anthony Hornof. 2008. Working With Children With Severe Motor Impairments As Design Partners. In IDC '08: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Interaction design and children. ACM, Chicago, Illinois, 69--72. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henrik Korsgaard, Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, and Susanne Bødker. 2016. Computational Alternatives in Participatory Design: Putting the T Back in Socio-technical Research. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcus Foth, Martin Tomitsch, Christine Satchell, and M. Hank Haeusler. 2015. From Users to Citizens: Some Thoughts on Designing for Polity and Civics. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (OzCHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 623--633. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ann Light, Chris Frauenberger, Jennifer Preece, Paul Strohmeier, and Maria Angela Ferrario. 2017. Special Topic: Taking Action in a Changing World. interactions 25, 1 (Dec. 2017), 34--45. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morten Kyng. 2010. Bridging the Gap Between Politics and Techniques: On the next practices of participatory design. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 22, 1 (2010). http://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol22/iss1/5Google Scholar
- Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Eva Eriksson, Kim Halskov, Helena Karasti, and John Vines. 2018. Unfolding participation over time: temporal lenses in participatory design. CoDesign 14, 1 (2018), 4--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2015. In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74, 0 (2015), 93 -- 106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vassilis Kostakos. 2015. The Big Hole in HCI Research. interactions 22, 2 (2015), 48--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas S. Kuhn. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Erik Stolterman. 2008. The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research. International Journal of Design 2, 1 (2008), 55--65.Google Scholar
- Dan Shapiro. 2005. Participatory Design: The Will to Succeed. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (CC '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 29--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellen Balka. 2006. Inside the Belly of the Beast: The Challenges and Successes of a Reformist Participatory Agenda. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Participatory Design: Expanding Boundaries in Design - Volume 1 (PDC '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 134--143. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers 23 (2011), 385--392. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14, 3 (1988), 575--599.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Egon G. Guba and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.). Number 6. Sage, London, UK, 105--117.Google Scholar
- Gareth Morgan. 1980. Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 4 (1980), 605.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erling Björgvinsson, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. Participatory design and "democratizing innovation". In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC '10). ACM, Sydney, Australia, 41--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eli Pariser. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What The Internet Is Hiding From You. Penguin. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Clement and Peter Van den Besselaar. 1993. A Retrospective Look at PD Projects. Commun. ACM 36, 6 (June 1993), 29--37. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Susan Leigh Star and Karen Ruhleder. 1994. Steps Towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Complex Problems in Design and Access for Large-scale Collaborative Systems. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 253--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Volkmar Pipek and Volker Wulf. 2009. Infrastructuring: Toward an integrated perspective on the design and use of information technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10, 5 (2009), 447.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher A. Le Dantec and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design. Social Studies of Science 43, 2 (2013), 241--264.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helena Karasti. 2014. Infrastructuring in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 141--150. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pelle Ehn. 2008. Participation in design things. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008. Indiana University, 92--101. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1795248 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yvonna S. Lincoln and Egon Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.Google Scholar
- Geraldine Fitzpatrick and Gunnar Ellingsen. 2012. A Review of25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 22, 4--6 (jun 2012), 609--665. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcus Foth and Jeff Axup. 2006. Participatory Design and Action Research: Identical Twins or Synergetic Pair?. In Proceedings Participatory Design Conference 2006: Expanding Boundaries in Design, Gianni Jacucci, Finn Kensing, Ina Wagner, and Jeanette Blomberg (Eds.). Trento, Italy, 93--96.Google Scholar
- Davydd J Greenwood. 2002. Action research: Unfulfilled promises and unmet challenges. Concepts and Transformation 7, 2 (2002), 117--139.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Björn Gustavsen. 2003. Action research and the problem of the single case. Concepts and Transformation 8, 1 (2003), 93--99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ray Pawson and Nick Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. Sage.Google Scholar
- Trisha Greenhalgh, Charlotte Humphrey, Jane Hughes, Frasder MacFarlane, Ceri Butler, and Ray Pawson. 2009. How Do You Modernize a Health Service? A Realist Evaluation of Whole-Scale Transformation in London. Milbank Quarterly 87, 2 (2009), 391--416.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chris Bonell, Adam Fletcher, Matthew Morton, Theo Lorenc, and Laurence Moore. 2012. Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Social Science & Medicine 75, 12 (2012), 2299--2306.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William A. Firestone. 1993. Alternative Arguments for Generalizing From Data as Applied to Qualitative Research. Educational Researcher 22, 4 (May 1993), 16--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Denise F. Polit and Cheryl Tatano Beck. 2010. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies. International Journal of Nursing Studies 47, 11 (2010), 1451--1458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deborah Finfgeld-Connett. 2010. Generalizability and transferability of meta-synthesis research findings. Journal of Advanced Nursing 66, 2 (Feb. 2010), 246--254.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christopher Frauenberger. 2016. Critical Realist HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, 341--351. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristina Höök, Peter Dalsgaard, Stuart Reeves, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jonas Löwgren, Erik Stolterman, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. Knowledge Production in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2429--2432. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren. 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 3 (2012), 1--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- JohnBowers.2012. The logic of annotated portfolios: communicating the value of 'research through design'. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, 68--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juli Eflin. 2008. Women and Cognitive Authority in the Knowledge Economy. In Knowledge Policy Challenges for the 21st Century, Greg Hearn and David Rooney (Eds.). Edward Elgar Publishing, 45--58.Google Scholar
- Thomas Nagel. 1989. The View From Nowhere. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gregory Hearn. 2002. Global Transformations in Knowledge - Social and Cultural Issues. In Encyclopaedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Vol. 1.24. Eolss Publishers, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- Marcus Foth, Nancy Odendaal, and Gregory N. Hearn. 2007. The View from Everywhere: Towards an Epistemology for Urbanites. In 4th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (ICICKM). Cape Town, South Africa, 127--133. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/9149/Google Scholar
- Björn Gustavsen. 2003. New forms of knowledge production and the role of action research. Action research 1, 2 (2003), 153--164.Google Scholar
- Joan Greenbaum and Morten Kyng (Eds.). 1992. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jesper Simonsen and Finn Kensing. 1994. Take Users Seriously, but Take a Deeper Look: Organizational and Technical Effects from Designing with an Ethnographically Inspired Approach. In In Proceedings of the Third Biennial Conference on Participatory Design. 27--28.Google Scholar
- Susanne Bødker. 1996. Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development. Human-Computer Interaction 11, 3 (Sept. 1996), 215--236. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brendon Clark. 2008. Resources for Action in the Negotiation of Participatory Design Projects. In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design 2008 (PDC '08). Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 206--209. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1795234.1795276 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carl DiSalvo. 2012. Adversarial Design. The MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laurens Boer, Jared Donovan, and Jacob Buur. 2013. Challenging industry conceptions with provotypes. CoDesign 9, 2 (jun 2013), 73--89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chantal Mouffe. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. Verso.Google Scholar
- Donald A. Norman. 2010. Technology First, Needs Last: The Research-product Gulf. interactions 17, 2 (2010), 38--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick Vlaskovits. 2011. Henry Ford, Innovation, and That "Faster Horse" Quote. (Aug. 2011). https://hbr.org/2011/08/henry-ford-never-said-the-fastGoogle Scholar
- Giasemi Vavoula and Mike Sharples. 2007. Future technology workshop: A collaborative method for the design of new learning technologies and activities. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2, 4 (2007), 393--419.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eva Brandt. 2006. Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design?. In PDC '06: Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 57--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (March 2008), 5--18.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lisa P. Nathan, Predrag V. Klasnja, and Batya Friedman. 2007. Value Scenarios: A Technique for Envisioning Systemic Effects of New Technologies. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2585--2590. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is "Critical" About Critical Design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, 3297--3306. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bob Dick. 2002. Building agreement from disagreement: The anatomy of dialectical processes. Interchange, Chapel Hill, QLD. http://www.aral.com.au/DLitt/DLitt_P24delphi.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Sandra G. Harding. 2004. The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Christian Dindler and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2014. Relational Expertise in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jonas Fritsch and Ole Sejer Iversen. 2014. Designing for Experience: Scaffolding a Design Ecology. In Enterprising Initiatives in the Experience Economy, Britta Timm Knudsen, Dorthe Refslund Christensen, and Per Blenker (Eds.). Routledge, 226--244.Google Scholar
- Anne Edwards. 2010. Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Springer.Google Scholar
- Anne Tomes and Peter Armstrong. 2010. Dialectics of design: how ideas of 'good design' change. Prometheus 28, 1 (2010), 29--39.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eli Berniker and David E. McNabb. 2006. Dialectical Inquiry: A Structured Qualitative Research Method. The Qualitative Report 11, 4 (2006), 643--664.Google Scholar
- Susanne Bødker. 2011. Use is Everywhere and Changing: Analysis and Design with the Human-artifact Model. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melissa Gregg and Gregory J. Seigworth. 2010. The Affect Theory Reader. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Patricia Ticineto Clough and Jean Halley. 2007. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Jonas Fritsch and Mogens Jacobsen. 2017. The Voice Pump: An Affectively Engaging Interface for Changing Attachments. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17 Companion). ACM, 265--269. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ruth Leys. 2011. The Turn to Affect: A Critique. Critical Inquiry 37, 3 (mar 2011), 434--472.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brian Massumi. 2002. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Lucian Leahu, Steve Schwenk, and Phoebe Sengers. 2008. Subjective Objectivity: Negotiating Emotional Meaning. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 425--434. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Preben Mogensen. 1992. Towards a Provotyping Approach in Systems Development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 4, 1 (1992). http://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol4/iss1/5Google Scholar
- Sara B. Hobolt. 2016. The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy 23, 9 (2016), 1259--1277.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yubo Kou, Yong Ming Kow, Xinning Gui, and Waikuen Cheng. 2017. One Social Movement, Two Social Media Sites: A Comparative Study of Public Discourses. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 26, 4--6 (2017), 807--836. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcus Foth, Leonardo Parra Agudelo, and Robin Palleis. 2013. Digital Soap-boxes: Towards an Interaction Design Agenda for Situated Civic Innovation. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication (UbComp '13 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 725--728. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dan Ariely. 2010. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. Harper Perennial, New York.Google Scholar
- Alan G. Sanfey, James K. Rilling, Jessica A. Aronson, Leigh E. Nystrom, and Jonathan D. Cohen. 2003. The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Science 300, 5626 (2003), 1755--1758.Google Scholar
- William E. Connolly. 2002. Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Nigel Thrift. 2004. Intensities of feeling: towards a spatial politics of affect. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 86, 1 (mar 2004), 57--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nancy Fraser. 2016. Progressive Neoliberalism versus Reactionary Populism: A Choice that Feminists Should Refuse. Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 24, 4 (2016), 281--284.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chad Jameson Clem. 2017. Going with Your Gut: A Study of Affect, Satire, and Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election. Master's thesis. Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
- Constantina Papoulias and Felicity Callard. 2010. Biology's Gift: Interrogating the Turn to Affect. Body & Society 16, 1 (mar 2010), 29--56.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clare Hemmings. 2005. Invoking Affect: Cultural Theory and the Ontological Turn. Cultural Studies 19, 5 (sep 2005), 548--567.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul Bloom. 2017. Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion. Random House.Google Scholar
- Peter Wright and John McCarthy. 2008. Empathy and experience in HCI. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '08). ACM, Florence, Italy, 637--646. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephen Lindsay, Katie Brittain, Daniel Jackson, Cassim Ladha, Karim Ladha, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. Empathy, Participatory Design and People with Dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 521--530. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Coulton, Jonny Huck, Andrew Hudson-Smith, Ralph Barthel, Panagiotis Mavros, Jennifer Roberts, and Philip Powell. 2014. Designing Interactive Systems to Encourage Empathy Between Users. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS Companion '14). ACM, 13--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katharina Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, Eva Hornecker, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. {n. d.}. When Empathy Is Not Enough: Assessing the Experiences of Autistic Children with Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2017) (CHI '17). ACM, 2853--2864. Honorable Mention (best 4% of submissions). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucas D. Introna. 2013. Epilogue: Performativity and the Becoming of Sociomaterial Assemblages. In Materiality and Space. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 330--342.Google Scholar
- Gilbert Cockton. 2009. Getting There: Six Meta-principles and Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2223--2232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gilbert Cockton. 2017. Engineering is Worth It, but Only when Rational Ideals Accept Reflective Realities. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Benedictus de Spinoza. 1994. A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Gabriela Avram, Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Stefano De Paoli, Ann Light, Peter Lyle, and Maurizio Teli. 2017. Collaborative Economies: From Sharing to Caring. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '17). ACM, 305--307. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ann Light and Yoko Akama. 2014. Structuring Future Social Relations: The Politics of Care in Participatory Practice. In Proceedings of the 13th Participatory Design Conference (PDC '14). ACM, 151--160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ann Light, Alison Powell, and Irina Shklovski. 2017. Design for Existential Crisis in the Anthropocene Age. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '17). ACM, 270--279. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alice V. Brown and Jaz Hee-jeong Choi. 2017. Towards Care-based Design: Trusted Others in Nurturing Posttraumatic Growth Outside of Therapy. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies (C&T '17). ACM, 56--63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa, and Murray Silverstein. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. OUP USA.Google Scholar
- Marcus Foth. 2006. Network action research. Action Research 4, 2 (2006), 205--226.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marcus Foth. 2008. Sociocultural animation. In Information Communication Technologies: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global, 464--471.Google Scholar
- Alison Gilchrist. 2004. The Well-connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development. Policy Press.Google Scholar
Index Terms
On scale, dialectics, and affect: pathways for proliferating participatory design
Recommendations
The Premise of Institutioning for the Proliferation of Communities and Technologies Research
C&T '19: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Communities & Technologies - Transforming CommunitiesThe role of institutions both as stakeholders in the work that communities and technologies (C&T) researchers are engaged in and as facilitators for ensuring continuity and scale-making of outcomes, impact and community benefits, is starting to be ...
Nurturing Constructive Disagreement - Agonistic Design with Neurodiverse Children
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsParticipatory design (PD) with heterogeneous groups poses particular challenges, requiring spaces in which different agendas or visions can be negotiated. In this paper we report on our PD work with two groups of neurodiverse children to design ...
On the Dialectics of Strategic Alliances
Using Van de Ven and Poole's (1995) extensive assessment of process theories as an intellectual scaffold, we review theoretical contributions to our understanding of alliance dynamics and process. It appears that of four generic theoretical engines, ...
Comments