skip to main content
10.1145/3210586.3210603acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Micro-ethics for participatory design with marginalised children

Published:20 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Marginalised children are uniquely vulnerable within western societies. Conducting participatory design research with them comes with particular ethical challenges, some of which we illustrate in this paper. Through several examples across two different participatory design projects (one with autistic children, another with visually impaired children), we reflect on the often overlooked tensions on the level of micro-ethics. We argue we are often required to rely on multiple moral frames of references. We discuss issues that the immediate interaction between researchers and marginalised children in participatory projects can bring and offer an understanding of how micro-ethics manifest in these collaborations. We contribute to a theoretical exploration of ethical encounters based on empirical grounds, which can guide other researchers in their participatory endeavours.

References

  1. Tatek Abebe. 2009. Multiple methods, complex dilemmas: negotiating socio-ethical spaces in participatory research with disadvantaged children. Children's Geographies 7, 4 (2009), 451--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Priscilla Alderson and Virginia Morrow. 2011. The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. Sage Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Alissa Antle. 2017. Crazy Like Us: Design for Vulnerable Populations. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alissa N. Antle. 2017. The Ethics of Doing Research with Vulnerable Populations. interactions 24, 6 (Oct. 2017), 74--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Martin Ashley. 2003. Primary School Boys' Identity Formation and the Male Role Model: An exploration of sexual identity and gender identity in the UK through attachment theory. Sex Education 3, 3 (2003), 257--270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. American Psychiatric Association. 2000. DSM-IV-TR. APA, 1000 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Marian Barnes, Tula Brannelly, Lizzie Ward, and Nicki Ward. 2015. Ethics of care: critical advances in international perspective. Policy Press, Bristol, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Peter Bittner and Eva Hornecker. 2005. A Micro-ethical View on Computing Practice. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (CC '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 69--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Joan Blaska. 1993. The power of language: Speak and write using "person first.". Perspectives on Disability (1993), 25--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tone Bratteteig and Ina Wagner. 2012. Disentangling Power and Decision-making in Participatory Design. In Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference: Research Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jane Coad, Faith Gibson, Maire Horstman, Linda Milnes, Duncan Randall, and Bernie Carter. 2015. Be my guest! Challenges and practical solutions of undertaking interviews with children in the home setting. Journal of Child Health Care 19, 4 (2015), 432--443. PMID: 24812062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bill Cooke and Uma Kothari. 2001. Participation: The new Tyranny? Zed Books, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. John Deigh. 2010. An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Elizabeth devita raeburn. 2016. Is the Most Common Therapy for Autism Cruel? (2016). https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2016/08/aba-autism-controversy/495272/?045hpbeaqd3kGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 656--671. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Dana S Dunn and Erin E Andrews. 2015. Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologistsâĂŹ cultural competence using disability language. American Psychologist 70, 3 (2015), 255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Carol Dweck. 2017. Mindset: changing the way you think to fulfil your potential. Hachette UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pelle Ehn and Richard Badham. 2002. Participatory design and the collective designer. In Proceedings of the 2002 Participatory Design Conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sigmund Eldevik, Richard P. Hastings, J. Carl Hughes, Erik Jahr, Svein Eikeseth, and Scott Cross. 2010. Using Participant Data to Extend the Evidence Base for Intensive Behavioral Intervention for Children With Autism. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 115, 5 (2010), 381--405. PMID: 20687823.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Christopher Frauenberger, Julia Makhaeva, and Katta Spiel. 2016. Designing Smart Objects with Autistic Children: Four Design Exposès. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 130--139. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Christopher Frauenberger, Julia Makhaeva, and Katta Spiel. 2017. Blending Methods: Developing Participatory Design Sessions for Autistic Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 39--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Christopher Frauenberger, Marjo Rauhala, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2016. In-Action Ethics. Interacting with Computers 28 (2016), published online first. Issue 6. arXiv:http://iwc.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/06/20/iwc.iww024.full.pdf+htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Christopher Frauenberger, Katta Spiel, and Julia Makhaeva. 2018. Thinking OutsideTheBox - Designing Smart Things with Autistic Children. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2018). Issue accepted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Michael Gallagher. 2008. 'Power is not an evil': rethinking power in participatory methods. Children's Geographies 6, 2 (2008), 137--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Anne Graham, Mary Powell, Nicola Taylor, Donnah Anderson, and Robyn Fitzgerald. 2013. Ethical research involving children - Florence: UNICEF Office of Research-Innocenti. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sandra Burri Gram-Hansen and Thomas Ryberg. 2016. From Participatory Design and Ontological Ethics, Towards an Approach to Constructive Ethics. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 45, 3 (Jan. 2016), 147--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kim Halskov and Nicolai Brodersen Hansen. 2015. The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002--2012. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (Feb. 2015), 81--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Dona J. Haraway. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Joseph R. Herkert. 2005. Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering. Sci Eng Ethics 11, 3 (July 2005), 373--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sally Holland, Emma Renold, Nicola J. Ross, and Alexandra Hillman. 2010. Power, agency and participatory agendas: A critical exploration of young people's engagement in participative qualitative research. Childhood 17, 3 (2010), 360--375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. 2006. Getting a Grip on Tangible Interaction: A Framework on Physical Space and Social Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '06). ACM, 437--446. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Aron Janssen, Howard Huang, and Christina Duncan. 2016. Gender Variance Among Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Retrospective Chart Review. Transgender Health 1, 1 (2016), 63--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Lorcan Kenny, Caroline Hattersley, Bonnie Molins, Carole Buckley, Carol Povey, and Elizabeth Pellicano. 2015. Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community. Autism 20, 4 (July 2015), 1362361315588200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Paul A. Komesaroff. 1995. From Bioethics to Microethics: Ethical Debate and Clinical Medicine. In Troubled Bodies: Critical Perspectives on Postmodernism, Medical Ethics and the Body, Paul A. Komesaroff (Ed.). Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA, 62--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Elaine Larson, Tiffany Bratts, Jack Zwanziger, and Patricia Stone. 2004. A Survey of IRB Process in 68 U.S. Hospitals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 36, 3 (2004), 260--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Kenneth O. St. Louis. 1999. Person-first labeling and stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders 24, 1 (1999), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Scott Lunsford. 2005. Seeking a Rhetoric of the Rhetoric of Dis/Abilities. Rhetoric Review 24, 3 (2005), 330--333. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20176665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Richard A Lynch. 2016. Foucault's critical ethics. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Andrew Main. 2003. allism: an introduction to a little-known condition. (2003). http://www.fysh.org/~zefram/allism/allism_intro.txtGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Julia Makhaeva, Christopher Frauenberger, and Katta Spiel. 2016. Creating Creative Spaces for Co-designing with Autistic Children: The Concept of a "Handlungsspielraum". In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 (PDC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 51--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Laura Malinverni and Narcis Pares. 2017. An Autoethnographic Approach to Guide Situated Ethical Decisions in Participatory Design with Teenagers. Interacting with Computers 29, 3 (2017), 403--415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '10). ACM, Orlando, Florida, USA, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Deborah Marks. 1997. Models of disability. Disability and Rehabilitation 19, 3 (1997), 85--91. PMID: 9134350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Edward W. Morris. 2016. 'Let Me Know When You Figure Everyone Around Here Out': Placing Gender in the Ethnographic Process. In Gender Identity and Research Relationships. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, Vol. 14. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK, 125--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Jenny Morris. 1991. Pride against prejudice: tranforming attitudes to disability. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Jenny Morris. 2001. Impairment and disability: constructing an ethics of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia 16, 4 (2001), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Cosmin Munteanu, Heather Molyneaux, Wendy Moncur, Mario Romero, Susan O'Donnell, and John Vines. 2015. Situational Ethics: Re-thinking Approaches to Formal Ethics Requirements for Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 105--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Kysa Nygreen. 2006. Reproducing or challenging power in the questions we ask and the methods we use: A framework for activist research in urban education. The Urban Review 38, 1 (2006), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Janet C. Read, Matthew Horton, Gavin Sim, Peggy Gregory, Daniel Fitton, and Brendan Cassidy. 2013. CHECk: A Tool to Inform and Encourage Ethical Practice in Participatory Design with Children. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 187--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Toni Robertson and Ina Wagner. 2012. Engagement, representation and politics-in-action. In The Handbook of Participatory Design. Routledge, London, UK, 64--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Christiane E. S. Rudolph, Andreas Lundin, Jill W. Åhs, Christina Dalman, and Kyriaki Kosidou. 2017. Brief Report: Sexual Orientation in Individuals with Autistic Traits: Population Based Study of 47,000 Adults in Stockholm County. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (30 Oct 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Cornelia M. Ruland, Justin Starren, and Torun M. Vatne. 2008. Participatory design with children in the development of a support system for patient-centered care in pediatric oncology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 41, 4 (2008), 624--635. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity Through Gender, Race, and Class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5412--5427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Donald A Schön. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass, Hoboken, NJ, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Jim Sinclair. 2013. Why I dislike âĂIJperson firstâĂİ Language. Autonomy, the Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies 1, 2 (2013). http://www.larry-arnold.net/Autonomy/index.php/autonomy/article/view/OP1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Judy Singer. 1999. Why canâĂŹt you be normal for once in your life? From a problem with no name to the emergence of a new category of difference. Disability discourse (1999), 59--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Katta Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. Experiences of autistic children with technologies. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 11 (2017), 50--61. Designing with and for Children with Special Needs.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Katta Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, Eva Hornecker, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. When Empathy Is Not Enough: Assessing the Experiences of Autistic Children with Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2853--2864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Katta Spiel, Julia Makhaeva, and Christopher Frauenberger. 2016. Embodied Companion Technologies for Autistic Children. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 245--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Katta Spiel, Laura Malinverni, Judith Good, and Christopher Frauenberger. 2017. Participatory Evaluation with Autistic Children. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5755--5766. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Marc Steen. 2011. Upon opening the blackbox of participatory design and finding it filled with ethics. In Proceedings of the Nordic design research conference no 4: Nordes 2011: Making design matter. 29--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. E. Kay M. Tisdall and S Punch. 2012. 'Not So 'New'?: Looking Critically at Childhood Studies. Children's Geographies 10, 3 (2012), 249--264. http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/5457511/Tisdall_and_Punch_2012_Not_so_new_Children_s_Geographies_10_3_.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Joan C Tronto. 2001. An ethic of care. In Ethics in community-based elder care. Springer Publishing Company, New York, NY, USA, 60--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Robert D Truog, Stephen D Brown, David Browning, Edward M Hundert, Elizabeth A Rider, Sigall K Bell, and Elaine C Meyer. 2015. Microethics: the ethics of everyday clinical practice. Hastings Center Report 45, 1 (2015), 11--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Maarten Van Mechelen, Gavin Sim, Bieke Zaman, Peggy Gregory, Karin Slegers, and Matthew Horton. 2014. Applying the CHECk Tool to Participatory Design Sessions with Children. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 253--256. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Michael R. Ward (Ed.). 2016. Gender Identity and Research Relationships. Studies in Qualitative Methodology, Vol. 14. Emeral Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Nick Watson. 2002. Well, I Know this is Going to Sound Very Strange to You, but I Don't See Myself as a Disabled Person: Identity and disability. Disability & Society 17, 5 (2002), 509--527.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Nick Watson. 2012. Theorising the Lives of Disabled Children: How Can Disability Theory Help? Children & Society 26, 3 (May 2012), 192--202.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Jenny Waycott, Hilary Davis, Anja Thieme, Stacy Branham, John Vines, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2015. Ethical Encounters in HCI: Research in Sensitive Settings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2369--2372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Jenny Waycott, Cosmin Munteanu, Hilary Davis, Anja Thieme, Wendy Moncur, Roisin McNaney, John Vines, and Stacy Branham. 2016. Ethical Encounters in Human-Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3387--3394. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Graham R. Williamson and Sue Prosser. 2002. Action research: politics, ethics and participation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 40, 5 (Dec. 2002), 587--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. George Yancy. 2016. Black Bodies, White Gazes: The Continuing Significance of Race in America. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, ML, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Micro-ethics for participatory design with marginalised children

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          PDC '18: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1
          August 2018
          207 pages
          ISBN:9781450363716
          DOI:10.1145/3210586

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 August 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          PDC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate17of67submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate49of289submissions,17%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader