skip to main content
article

Optimizing RAID/SSD controllers with lifetime extension for flash-based SSD array

Published:19 June 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Flash-based SSD RAID arrays are increasingly being deployed in data centers. Compared with HDD arrays, SSD arrays drastically enhance storage density and I/O performance, and reduce power and rack space. Nevertheless, SSDs suffer aging issues. Though prior studies have been conducted to address this disadvantage, effective techniques of RAID/SSD controllers are urgently needed to extend the lifetime of SSD arrays.

In this paper, we for the first time apply approximate storage via the interplay of RAID and SSD controllers to optimize the lifespan of SSD arrays. Our basic idea is to reuse faulty blocks (those contain pages with uncorrectable errors) to store approximate data (which can tolerate more errors). By relaxing the integrity of flash blocks, we observed that the endurance of NAND flash memory can be significantly boosted, thereby providing huge potentials to significantly extend the lifetime of SSDs. Based on this observation, we propose the use of an efficient space management scheme for data allocation and FTL strategies by coordinating the interplay of RAID and SSD controllers to optimize the lifetime of SSD arrays. We implemented a prototype, called FreeRAID, based on an SSD array simulator. Our experiments show that we can significantly increase the lifetime by up to 2.17× compared with conventional SSD-based RAID arrays.

References

  1. Rodolfo Azevedo, John D Davis, Karin Strauss, Parikshit Gopalan, Mark Manasse, and Sergey Yekhanin. 2013. Zombie memory: Extending memory lifetime by reviving dead blocks. In ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. ACM, 452-463. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mahesh Balakrishnan, Asim Kadav, Vijayan Prabhakaran, and Dahlia Malkhi. 2010. Differential raid: Rethinking raid for ssd reliability. ACM Transactions on Storage (TOS) 6, 2 (2010), 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Matias Bjørling. 2011. Extended FlashSim. (2011). https://github.com/MatiasBjorling/flashsimGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ching-Che Chung and Hao-Hsiang Hsu. 2014. Partial parity cache and data cache management method to improve the performance of an SSD-based RAID. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems 22, 7 (2014), 1470- 1480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jinhua Cui, Youtao Zhang, Liang Shi, Chun Jason Xue, Weiguo Wu, and Jun Yang. 2017. ApproxFTL: On the Performance and Lifetime Improvement of 3D NAND Flash based SSDs. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. EMC. 2015. Introduction to the EMC XtremIO Storage Array. https://www.emc.com/collateral/white-papers/h11752-intro-to-XtremIO-array-wp.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Amherst Laboratory for Advanced System Software. 2012. Umass trace repository. http://traces.cs.umass.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jie Guo, Zhijie Chen, Danghui Wang, Zili Shao, and Yiran Chen. [n. d.]. DPA: A data pattern aware error prevention technique for NAND flash lifetime extension. In 2014 19th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Qing Guo, Karin Strauss, Luis Ceze, and Henrique S Malvar. 2016. High-density image storage using approximate memory cells. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 51. ACM, 413-426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Aayush Gupta, Youngjae Kim, and Bhuvan Urgaonkar. 2009. DFTL: a flash translation layer employing demand-based selective caching of page-level address mappings. Vol. 44. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Djordje Jevdjic, Karin Strauss, Luis Ceze, and Henrique S Malvar. 2017. Approximate Storage of Compressed and Encrypted Videos. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. ACM, 361-373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Xavier Jimenez, David Novo, and Paolo Ienne. 2014. Wear unleveling: improving NAND flash lifetime by balancing page endurance. In Proceedings of the 12th USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies. USENIX Association, 47-59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jesung Kim, Jong Min Kim, Sam H Noh, Sang Lyul Min, and Yookun Cho. 2002. A space-efficient flash translation layer for CompactFlash systems. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 48, 2 (2002), 366-375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yongkun Li, Helen HWChan, Patrick PC Lee, and Yinlong Xu. 2016. Elastic parity logging for SSD RAID arrays. In 46th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks. IEEE, 49-60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Yongkun Li, Patrick PC Lee, and John CS Lui. 2016. Analysis of reliability dynamics of SSD RAID. IEEE Trans. Comput. 65, 4 (2016), 1131-1144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Duo Liu, Yi Wang, Zhiwei Qin, Zili Shao, and Yong Guan. 2012. A space reuse strategy for flash translation layers in SLC NAND flash memory storage systems. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems 20, 6 (2012), 1094-1107. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Youyou Lu, Jiwu Shu, and Weimin Zheng. 2013. Extending the lifetime of flash-based storage through reducing write amplification from file systems. In Proceedings of the 11th USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies. USENIX Association, 257-270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sangwhan Moon and AL Reddy. 2016. Does RAID improve lifetime of SSD arrays? ACM Transactions on Storage (TOS) 12, 3 (2016), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yongseok Oh, Jongmoo Choi, Donghee Lee, and Sam H Noh. 2013. Improving performance and lifetime of the ssd raidbased host cache through a log-structured approach. In 1st Workshop on Interactions of NVM/FLASH with Operating Systems and Workloads. ACM, 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Zhiwei Qin, Yi Wang, Duo Liu, and Zili Shao. 2010. Demand-based block-level address mapping in large-scale NAND flash storage systems. In Proceedings of the eighth IEEE/ACM/IFIP international conference on Hardware/software codesign and system synthesis. ACM, 173-182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zhiwei Qin, Yi Wang, Duo Liu, Zili Shao, and Yong Guan. 2011. MNFTL: An efficient flash translation layer for MLC NAND flash memory storage systems. In Proceedings of the 48th Design Automation Conference. ACM, 17-22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pedro Reviriego, Juan A Maestro, and Mark F Flanagan. 2013. Error detection in majority logic decoding of euclidean geometry low density parity check (EG-LDPC) codes. IEEE transactions on very large scale integration (VLSI) systems 21, 1 (2013), 156-159. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pooja Roy, Rajarshi Ray, Chundong Wang, and Weng FaiWong. 2014. Asac: Automatic sensitivity analysis for approximate computing. In ACM SIGPLAN Notices, Vol. 49. ACM, 95-104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Adrian Sampson, Jacob Nelson, Karin Strauss, and Luis Ceze. 2014. Approximate storage in solid-state memories. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS) 32, 3 (2014), 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Samsung. 2011. 16GB F-die NAND flash multi-level-cell (2bit/cell). (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Daniel Stodolsky, Garth Gibson, and Mark Holland. 1993. Parity logging overcoming the small write problem in redundant disk arrays. In ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News, Vol. 21. ACM, 64-75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Hairong Sun, Pete Grayson, and Bob Wood. 2011. Quantifying reliability of solid-state storage from multiple aspects. Proceedings of the Storageconference. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hitachi Data Systems. 2018. Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform G Series. Technical Report. https://www.hitachivantara.com/en-us/products/storage/virtual-storage-platform-g-series.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Akshat Verma, Ricardo Koller, Luis Useche, and Raju Rangaswami. 2010. SRCMap: energy proportional storage using dynamic consolidation. In Proceedings of the 8th USENIX conference on File and Storage Technologies. USENIX Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Debao Wei, Libao Deng, Liyan Qiao, Peng Zhang, and Xiyuan Peng. 2016. PEVA: A page endurance variance aware strategy for the lifetime extension of NAND flash. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems 24, 5 (2016), 1749-1760. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Optimizing RAID/SSD controllers with lifetime extension for flash-based SSD array

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGPLAN Notices
          ACM SIGPLAN Notices  Volume 53, Issue 6
          LCTES '18
          June 2018
          112 pages
          ISSN:0362-1340
          EISSN:1558-1160
          DOI:10.1145/3299710
          Issue’s Table of Contents
          • cover image ACM Conferences
            LCTES 2018: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED International Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems
            June 2018
            112 pages
            ISBN:9781450358033
            DOI:10.1145/3211332

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 June 2018

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader