ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Towards empirical studies of programming in new paradigms
Full text PdfPdf (793 KB)
Source ACM Annual Computer Science Conference archive
Proceedings of the 1988 ACM sixteenth annual conference on Computer science table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Pages: 72 - 78  
Year of Publication: 1988
ISBN:0-89791-260-8
Authors
T. T. Carey  Department of Computing and Information Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
M. M. Shepherd  Department of Computing and Information Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 9,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/322609.322618
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Programmers learning a new paradigm seem to show both positive and negative transfer effects from their programming experience. This paper presents an initial discussion of relearning programming, and preliminary empirical studies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Kuhn, T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (2d ed. University of Chicago Press) 1970.
 
2
ibid., p. I91.
 
3
Hailpern, B., editor's introduction to the special issue on Multiparadigm Languages and Environments, IEEE Software 3(1), 1986, p. 8.
 
4
 
5
Munakata, T., Procedurally Oriented Programming Techniques in Prolog, IEEE Expert, 1(2), 1986, pp. 41-47.
 
6
 
7
Taylor, B.P., The Use of Overgeneralization and Transfer Learning Strategies by Elementary and Intermediate University Students of ESL, in Burt, M.K. and H.C. Dulay, ed. New Directions in Second Language Learning, Teaching and Bilingual Education (Washington, D.C.), 1075, pp. 55-69.
 
8
Schuster, E., The Role of Native Grammars in Correcting Errors in Second Language Learning, in Computational Intelligence, 2(2), 1985.
 
9
Cannon, F.R., Transferability of learning of syntax between Cobol and Fortran, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Temple University, 1977.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Spohrer, J., E. Soloway and E. Pope, A goal/plan analysis of buggy Pascal programs, Human- Computer Interaction, 1(2), 1985.
 
14
Soloway, E., J. Lochhead and J. Clement, Does computer programming enhunce problem solving ability? Some positive evidence on algebra work problems, in Seidel, R., B. Hunter and R. Anderson, ed. Computer Literacy (Academic Press, New York), pp. 171-215.
 
15
Siddlqi, J. and J. Sumiga, Evaluation of a Proposed Model of the Design Process, Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on the Empirical Foundations of Information and System Sciences (Atlanta, GA), 1986.
 
16
Hayes-Roth, B. and F. Hayes-Roth, A cognitive Model of Planning, Cognitive Sciences 3, pp. 275- 310.
 
17
 
18
Bowen, K. A., Logic Programming with MProlog, course notes, 1984.
 
19
Komorovski, j., A Prolog meta-interpreter, seminar at the University of Waterloo, November 1985.
 
20
Muncher, E., P. Poison and D. Kieras, Negative Transfer in Text Editing Ta~ks?, poster session at Sigchi'87, April 1987.
 
21
Sheppurd, S.B., }3. Curtis, P. Mill}man ~nd T. Love, Modern coding practices and programming performance, IEEE Computer 12 (12), pp. 41-49.


Collaborative Colleagues:
T. T. Carey: colleagues
M. M. Shepherd: colleagues