skip to main content
research-article

Computer-Assisted Orientation and Drawing of Archaeological Pottery

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 December 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Archaeologists spend considerable time orienting and drawing ceramic fragments by hand for documentation, to infer their manufacture, the nature of the discovery site and its chronology, and to develop hypotheses about commercial and cultural exchanges, social organisation, resource exploitation, and taphonomic processes. This study presents a survey of existing solutions to the time-consuming problem of orienting and drawing pottery fragments. Orientation is based on the 3D geometry of pottery models, which can now be acquired in minutes with low-cost 3D scanners. Several methods are presented: they are based on normal vectors, or circle fittings, or profile fittings. All these methods seek to determine the optimal position of the rotation axis. We also present and discuss new approaches and improvements to existing methods. We have developed a suite of functions for the computer-assisted orientation and drawing of archaeological pottery. The profile and contours of the fragment, as well as any possible decoration, can be depicted in various ways: photorealistic rendering or dotted patterns, calculated by ambient occlusion, combined or not with artificial light. The general workflow, evaluated using both synthetic and real-world fragments, is rapid, accurate, and reproducible. It drastically reduces the amount of routine work required to document ceramic artefacts. The information produced, together with the 3D representation of the fragments, can easily be archived and/or exchanged within the archaeological community for further research. The source code (built in the R environment), together with an installation notice and examples, is freely downloadable.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Lesley Adkins and Roy Adkins. 1989. Archaeological Illustration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Edward B. Banning. 2006. The Archaeologist’s Laboratory: The Analysis of Archaeological Data. Springer Science 8 Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Francesco Banterle, Barak Itkin, Matteo Dellepiane, Lior Wolf, Marco Callieri, Nachum Dershowitz, and Roberto Scopigno. 2017. VASESKETCH: Automatic 3D representation of pottery from paper catalogue drawings. In Proceedings of the 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR’17). 8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yan Cao and David Mumford. 2002. Geometric structure estimation of axially symmetric pots from small fragments. In Structure Estimation of Axially Symmetric Pots from Small Fragments.. Article 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Winston Chang, Jow Cheng, J. J. Allaire, Yihui Xie, and Jonathan McPherson. 2017. Shiny: Web Application Framework for R. R package version 1.0.3. Retrieved October 30, 2017 from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shiny.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Nikolai Chernov. 2010. Circular and Linear Regression: Fitting Circles and Lines by Least Squares. Chapman 8 Hall/CRC Monographs on Statistics 8 Applied Probability, CRC Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Paolo Cignoni, Marco Callieri, Massimiliano Corsini, Matteo Dellepiane, Fabio Ganovelli, and Guido Ranzuglia. 2008. MeshLab: An open-source mesh processing tool. In Proceedings of the 6th Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference. 129--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernand Cohen, Zexi Liu, and Taslidere Ezgi. 2013. Virtual reconstruction of archaeological vessels using expert priors and intrinsic differential geometry information. Computers and Graphics 37, 1--2 (2013), 41--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lesley Collet. 2012. An Introduction to Drawing Archaeological Pottery. Institute for Archaeologists, Whiteknights.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. David B. Cooper, Andrew Willis, Stuart Andrews, Jill Baker, Yan Cao, Dongjin Han, Kongbin Kang, Weixin Kong, Frederic F. Leymarie, Xavier Orriols, Senem Velipasalar, Eileen L. Vote, Martha S. Joukowsky, Benjamin B. Kimia, David H. Laidlaw, and David Mumford. 2002. Bayesian pot-assembly from fragments as problems in perceptual grouping and geometric-learning. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. 297--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Paolo Cortez. 2014. Modern Optimization with R. Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Brian D. Dillon. 1985. The Student’s Guide to Archaeological Illustrating. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Philippe Dolmazon. 2007. Profilograph. Retrieved October 30, 2017 from http://www.dolmazon.de/profilographe_e.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fabio Ganovelli, Massimiliano Corsini, Sumanta Pattanaik, and Marco Di Benedetto. 2014. Introduction to Computer Graphics: A Practical Learning Approach. Chapman and Hall/CRC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Michael Garland and Paul S. Heckbert. 1997. Surface simplification using quadratic error metrics. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH’97). 209--216. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wiesława Gawrysiak-Leszczyńska. 2013. Jak Rysować Zabytki Archeologiczne. Muzeum Archeologiczne w Biskupinie, Biskupin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ayelet Gilboa, Avshalom Karasik, Ilan Sharon, and Uzy Smilansky. 2004. Towards computerized typology and classification of ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 31 (2004), 681--694.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nick Griffiths, Anne Jenner, and Christine Wilson. 1990. Drawing Archaeological Finds: A Handbook. University College London, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Maria Letizia Gualandi, Roberto Scopigno, Lior Wolf, Julian Richards, Jaume Buxeda i Garrigos, Michael Heinzelmann, Miguel Angel Hervas, Llorenc Vila, and Massimo Zallocco. 2016. ArchAIDE archaeological automatic interpretation and documentation of cEramics. In Proceedings of the EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage (2016). 4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Radim Halíř. 1997. Estimation of the axis of rotation of fragments of archaeological pottery. In Proceedings of the 21st Workshop of the Austrian Association for Pattern Recognition. 175--184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Radim Halíř. 1999. An automatic estimation of the axis of rotation of fragments of archaeological pottery: A multi-step model-based approach. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualisation and Interactive Digital Media (WSCG’99). 7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Radim Halíř and Jan Flusser. 1997. Estimation of profiles of sherds of archaeological pottery. In Proceedings of the Czech Pattern Recognition Workshop (CPRW’97). 126--130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dongjin Han and Hern-Soo Hahn. 2014. Axis estimation and grouping of rotationally symmetric object segments. Pattern Recognition 47, 1 (2014), 296--312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kateřina Hlaváčkovaá-Schindler, Martin Kampel, and Robert Sablatnig. 2001. Fitting of a closed planar curve representing a profile of an archaeological fragment. In Proceedings of the 2001 Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology, and Cultural Heritage. 263--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Andrey Iones, Anton Krupkin, Mateu Sbert, and Sergey Zhukov. 2003. Fast, realistic lighting for video games. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 23, 3 (2003), 54--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Reiko Ishihara-Brito. 2011. Archaeological illustrations of ceramics: Drawing conventions and practices in the maya area. In Handbook for the 1st Annual Maya at the Lago Workshop , 2011. 16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin Kampel and Robert Sablatnig. 1999. On 3D modelling of archaeological sherds. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Synthetic-Natural Hybrid Coding and Three-Dimensional Imaging. 95--98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin Kampel and Robert Sablatnig. 1999. On estimating the position of fragments on rotational symmetric pottery. In Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modelling. 455--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Martin Kampel and Robert Sablatnig. 2003. An automated pottery archival and reconstruction system. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation 14 (2003), 111--120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Martin Kampel and Robert Sablatnig. 2003. Profile-based pottery reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, 2003. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Martin Kampel and Robert Sablatnig. 2007. Rule based system for archaeological pottery classification. Pattern Recognition Letters 28, 6 (2007), 740--747. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Martin Kampel, Robert Sablatnig, and Hubert Mara. 2005. Robust 3D reconstruction of archaeological pottery based on concentric circular rills. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Image Analysis of Multimedia Interactive Services. 14--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Avshalom Karasik. 2010. A complete, automatic procedure for pottery documentation and analysis. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW’10). 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Avshalom Karasik and Uzy Smilansky. 2008. 3D scanning technology as a standard archaeological tool for pottery analysis: Practice and theory. Journal of Archaeological Science 35, 5 (2008), 1148--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Avshalom Karasik and Uzy Smilansky. 2011. Computerized morphological classification of ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 38 (2011), 2644--2657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Àlex Méndez-Fellu and Matteu Sbert. 2009. From obscurances to ambient occlusion: A survey. Visual Computer 25 (2009), 181--196. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Shengqiao Li. 2011. Concise formulas for the area and volume of a hyperspherical cap. Asian Journal of Mathematics 8 Statistics 4, 1 (2011), 66--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jun Liu, Mingquan Zhou, Guohua Geng, and Reziwanguli Xiamixiding. 2017. Broken pottery relic reassembling based on mixed feature vector. Boletin Tecnico/Technical Bulletin 55, 5 (2017), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Hubert Mara. 2009. Pottery Plotted by Laser -- 3D Acquisition for Documentation and Analysis of Symmetry of Ancient Ceramics. Springer Berlin, 379--390.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Hubert Mara, Martin Kampel, Franco Niccolucci, and Robert Sablatnig. 2007. Ancient coins 8 ceramics - 3D and 2D documentation for preservation and retrieval of lost Heritage. In Proceedings of the 2nd ISPRS International Workshop 3D-ARCH 2007: 3D Virtual Reconstruction and Visualization of Complex Architectures. 12--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Hubert Mara and Julia Portl. 2013. Acquisition and documentation of vessels using high-resolution 3D-scanners. In Neue Interdisziplin are Dokumentations- und Visualisierungsmethoden, Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum Österreich, Beiheft 1, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (VÖAW). 25--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Hubert Mara and Robert Sablatnig. 2006. Orientation of fragments of rotationally symmetrical 3D-shapes for archaeological documentation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International 3D Data Processing, Visualization, and Transmission (3DPVT’06). 1064--1071. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ricardo Maronna and Victor J. Yohai. 2000. Robust regression with both continuous and categorical predictors. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 89, 1--2 (2000), 197--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. John C. Nash. 2014. On best practice optimization methods in R. Journal of Statistical Software 60, 2 (2014), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. John C. Nash and Ravi Varadhan. 2011. Unifying optimization algorithms to aid software system users: Optimx for R. Journal of Statistical Software 43, 9 (2011), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Clive Orton, Paul Tyres, and Alan Vince. 1993. Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Geoffrey Oxholm and Ko Nishino. 2013. A flexible approach to reassembling thin artifacts of unknown geometry. Journal of Cultural Heritage 14, 1 (2013), 51--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Georgios Papaioannou, Tobias Schreck, Anthousis Andreadis, Pavlos Mavridis, Robert Gregor, Ivan Sipiran, and Konstantinos Vardis. 2017. From reassembly to object completion: A complete systems pipeline. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 10, 2 (2017), Article 8, 23 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Stephen Phillips, Paul Walland, Stefano Modafferi, Michela Spagnuolo, Chiara Eva Catalano, Dominic Oldman, Ayellet Tal, Illan Shimshoni, and Sorin Hermon. 2016. GRAVITATE: Geometric and semantic matching for cultural heritage artefacts. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. 199--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Nada A. Rasheed and Md Jan Nordin. 2015. A survey of computer methods in reconstruction of 3D archaeological pottery objects. International Journal of Advanced Research 3, 3 (2015), 712--724.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Prudence M. Rice. 1987. Pottery Analysis. A Sourcebook. The University of Chicago Press, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Francisco Javier Melero Rus, Alejandro J. León, Francesco Contreras, and Juan Carlos Torres. 2004. A new system for interactive vessel reconstruction and drawing. BAR International Series 1227 (2004), 78--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Francisco Javier Melero Rus, Juan Carlos Torres, and Alejandro J. León. 2003. On the interactive 3D reconstruction of Iberian vessels. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage. 71--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Robert Sablatnig, Hubert Mara, and Martin Kampel. 2005. Estimation of rotational symmetry based on concentric circular rill. In Proceedings of the 29th Workshop of the Austrian Association for Pattern Recognition (OAGM/AAPR) and Joint Hungarian-Austrian Conference on Image Processing and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Idit Saragusti, Avshalom Karasik, Ilan Sharon, and Uzy Smilansky. 2005. Quantitative analysis of shape attributes based on contours and section profiles in artifact analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 32 (2005), 841--853.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Stefan Schlager. 2013. Soft-Tissue Reconstruction of the Human Nose: Population Differences and Sexual Dimorphism. Ph.D. dissertation. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Freiburg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Stefan Schlager. 2016. Morpho: Calculations and visualizations related to geometric morphometrics (version 2.4.1.1). Retrieved October 30, 2017 from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Morpho/Morpho.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Prabodh Shirvalkar. 2016. Analytical Drawing (Chapter 14). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 217--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Neil G. Smith, Avshalom Karasik, Tejaswini Naryanan, Eric S. Olson, Uzy Smilansky, and Thomas E. Levy. 2014. The pottery informatics query database: A new method for mathematic and quantitative analyses of large regional ceramic datasets. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 21 (2014), 212--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Melanie Steiner. 2005. Approaches to Archaeological Illustration: A Handbook. Council for British Archaeology, York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. RStudio Team. 2016. RStudio. Integrated Development for R. Retrieved October 30, 2017 from http://www.rstudio.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. R Core Team. 2016. A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved October 30, 2017 from https://www.R-project.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Jörg Vollmer, Robert Mencl, and Heinrich Müeller. 1999. Improved Laplacian smoothing of noisy surface meshes. Computer Graphics Forum 18, 3 (1999), 131--138.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Andrew Willis and David B. Cooper. 2008. From ruins to relics: Computational reconstruction of ancient artifacts. IEE Signal Processing Magazine 25 (2008), 65--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Andrew Willis, Xavier Orriols, Senem Velipasalar, Xavier Binefa, and David B. Cooper. 2000. Extracting Axially Symmetric Geometry from Limited 3D Range Data. Technical Report. Brown University, Brown.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Ben Yacoub and Christian Menard. 1997. Robust axis determination for rotational symmetric objects out of range data. In Proceedings of the 21st AAPR Workshop. 197--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Victor J. Yohai. 1987. High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. The Annals of Statistics 15, 2 (1987), 642--656.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Kang Zhang, Wuyi Yu, Mary Manhein, Warren Waggenspack, and Xin Li. 2015. 3D fragment reassembly using integrated template guidance and fracture-region matching. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2138--2146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Computer-Assisted Orientation and Drawing of Archaeological Pottery

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage
      Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage   Volume 11, Issue 4
      December 2018
      122 pages
      ISSN:1556-4673
      EISSN:1556-4711
      DOI:10.1145/3293468
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 December 2018
      • Accepted: 1 April 2018
      • Revised: 1 February 2018
      • Received: 1 October 2017
      Published in jocch Volume 11, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format