Abstract
Over the past years, Virtual Archaeology has introduced more experiential elements in virtual reconstructions, therefore going beyond the traditional visualization of 3D architectural models. In the case of dissemination, these experiences equate to a trip in time, in which users witness what the past was like and learn about it. However, due to a lack of explicit theoretical frameworks and/or systematic evaluation focusing on such experiential elements, it is uncertain whether the intended goals are achieved and why. Based on a novel theoretical framework arising from the concept of Cultural Presence, this article will investigate if and how current virtual environments achieve the feeling of traveling to the past. To that end, six different virtual reconstructions of the Neolithic site of Çatalhöyük (Turkey) were built and evaluated in a between-subjects experiment. The results support the role of content meaningfulness, responsive characters, enhanced interaction, and multisensory realism in the achievement of successful Virtual Reality--mediated experiences.
- S. M. Alessi. 1988. Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction 15 (1988), 40--47. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Andreoli, A. Corolla, A. Faggiano, D. Malandrino, D. Pirozzi, M. Ranaldi et al. 2016. Immersivity and playability evaluation of a game experience in cultural heritage. In EuroMed 2016: Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10058. Springer, 814--824.Google Scholar
- A. Bentkowska-Kafel, D. Baker, and H. Denard (Eds.). 2012. Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage. Ashgate. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Blythe, Peter C. Wright, John C. McCarthy, and Olav W. Bertelsen. 2006. Theory and method for experience-centered design. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’06). 1691--1694. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Bogdanovych, J. A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, S. Simoff, and A. Cohen. 2010. Authentic interactive reenactment of cultural heritage with 3D virtual worlds and artificial intelligence. Applied Artificial Intelligence 24 (2010), 617--647. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Bonini. 2008. Building virtual heritage environments: The embodied mind at the core of the learning processes. International Journal of Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism 1, 2--3 (2008), 113--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Brogni, M. Slater, and A. Steed. 2003. More breaks less presence. In Presence 2003: Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Workshop on Presence.Google Scholar
- D. Callebaut. 2002. The experiences of the Ename 974 project with new media: Where and how to do virtual reality and interactivity fit in? In Virtual Archaeology: Proceedings of the VAST Euroconference. 179--185.Google Scholar
- E. Champion. 2005. Cultural presence. In Encyclopaedia of Virtual Communities and Technologies. IGI Publishing, Hershey, PA, 95--101.Google Scholar
- E. Champion. 2007. Social presence and cultural presence in Oblivion. In Proceedings of the 7th International Digital Arts and Culture Conference: The Future of Digital Media Culture.Google Scholar
- E. Champion. 2015. Role-playing and rituals for Cultural Heritage-oriented games. In Proceedings of DIGRA 2015 “Diversity of play: Games--Cultures--Identities.”Google Scholar
- E. Champion, I. Bishop, and B. Dave. 2012. The Palenque project: Evaluating interaction in an online virtual archaeology site. Virtual Reality 16, 29 (2012), 121--139. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Csikszentmihályi and K. Hermanson. 1995. Intrinsic motivation in museums. What makes visitors want to learn. Museum News 74, 3 (1995), 35--62.Google Scholar
- K. Devine. 2013. The virtual Sydney rocks: A case study of a Virtual Heritage environment. International Journal of Heritage and Sustainable Development 3, 1 (2013), 63--69.Google Scholar
- K. Devine. 2014. Go your own way: User preference in a time-based virtual heritage world. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Dewey. 1934. Art as Experience. Penguin Books (2005), New York, NY.Google Scholar
- B. Dicks. 2004. Culture on Display: The Production of Contemporary Visitability. Open University Press, Maidenhead Berkshire, UK.Google Scholar
- Ename. 2015. Visualisation of the Benedictine Abbey of Ename: How a Bunch of Stones Becomes an Intriguing Story. Ename Blog. Retrieved January 7, 2019 from https://enameabbey.wordpress.com/1290-game/.Google Scholar
- J. Falk and L. Dierking. 2013. The Museum Experience Revisited. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, CA.Google Scholar
- B. Fanini and A. Pagano. 2015. Interface design for serious game visual strategies. The case study of “Imago Bononiae.” In Proceedings of Digital Heritage 2015.Google Scholar
- J. Forlizzi and K. Battarbee. 2004. Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proceedings of DIS04: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques 2004. 261--268. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Forte and A. Siliotti. 1997. Virtual Archaeology. Thames and Hudson, London, UK.Google Scholar
- A. Gaitatzes, D. Christopoulos, and M. Roussou. 2001. Reviving the past: Cultural Heritage meets Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the Conference on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (VAST'01). 103--110. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. H. Gentile, N. Spiller, and G. Noci. 2007. How to sustain the customer experience: An overview of experience components that co-create value with the customer. European Management Journal 25, 5 (2007), 395--410.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Gooch and B. Gooch. 1999. Using non-photorealistic rendering to communicate shape. Non-photorealistic rendering. In SIGGRAPH 99 Course Notes: Course on Non-Photorrealistic Rendering, S. Green (Ed.). ACM, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- M. Greeff and V. Lalioti. 2001. Interactive cultural experiences using virtual identities. In Proceedings of International Cultural Heritage Informatics Meetings. 455--465.Google Scholar
- Y. Hamilakis. 2013. Archaeology and the Senses: Human Experience, Memory and Affect. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- M. Hassenzahl. 2013. User experience and experience design. In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.), M. Soegaard and R. F. Dam (Eds.). Interaction Design Foundation.Google Scholar
- C. Heeter. 1992. Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1, 2 (1992), 262--271. Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Hodder. 2013. Çatalhöyük Excavations: The 2000-2008 seasons: Çatal Research Project Vol. 7--10. Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
- E. Hooper-Greenhill, J. Dodd, Th. Moussouri, C. Jones, Ch. Pickford, C. Herman et al. 2003. Measuring the Outcomes and Impact of Learning in Museums, Archives and Libraries. Research Centre for Museums and Galleries.Google Scholar
- N. Ibrahim, N. Mohamad Ali, and N. F. Mohd Yatim. 2015. Factors facilitating cultural learning in virtual architectural heritage environments: End user perspective. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 8 (2015), 8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Ijaz, A. Bogdanovych, and T. Trescak. 2014. Virtual worlds vs books and videos in history education. Interactive Learning Environments 25, 7 (2014), 904--929.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. T. Jones. 2005. The impact of Telepresence on cultural transmission through Bishoujo Games. Psychnology Journal 3, 3 (2005), 292--311.Google Scholar
- J. Kantner. 2000. Realism vs reality: Creating virtual reconstructions of prehistoric Architecture. In Virtual Reality in Archaeology, J. A. Barceló, M. Forte, and D. H. Sanders (Eds.). Archaeopress, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
- A. Kocsis, C. Barnes, and S. Huxley. 2010. Framing the phenomenon of visitor experience in interactive exhibitions. In Exhibition Design for Galleries and Museums: An Insider's View, G. Rouette (Ed.). Carlton South, Victoria, Australia, 10--18.Google Scholar
- P. Koutsabasis. 2017. Empirical evaluations of interactive systems in cultural heritage: A review. International Journal on Computational Methods in Heritage Science 1, 1 (2017), 100--122. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Lee, S. T. Park, and H. S. Kim. 2005. Students’ understanding of astronomical concepts enhanced by an immersive virtual reality system. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communication Technologies in Education.Google Scholar
- M. Lombard and T. Ditton. 1997. At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3, 2 (1997).Google Scholar
- V. M. López-Menchero. 2013. International guidelines for virtual archaeology: The Seville principles. In Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics, C. Corsi, B. Slapšak, and F. Vermeulen (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, 269--283.Google Scholar
- S. Macdonald. 2007. Interconnecting: Museum visiting and exhibition design. CoDesign 1, 3 (2007), 149--162.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. B. Madsen and C. B. Madsen. 2015. Handheld visual representation of a castle chapel ruin. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 9, 1 (2015), Article 6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Mikropoulos and V. Strouboulis. 2004. Factors that influence presence in educational virtual environments. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7, 5 (2004), 582--591.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. L. Morgan. 2009. (Re)Building Çatalhöyük: Changing virtual reality in archaeology. Archaeologies 5 (2009), 468.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Norman, J. Miller, and A. Henderson. 1995. What you see, some of what's in the future, and how we go about doing it: HI at Apple Computer. In Proceedings of the Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’95). 155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Paliou and D. J. Knight. 2013. Mapping the senses: Perceptual and social aspects of late antique liturgy in San Vitale, Ravenna. In Proceedings of the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology International Conference.Google Scholar
- C. Papadopoulos, Y. Hamilakis, and N. Kyparissi-Apostolika. 2015. Light in a Neolithic dwelling: Building 1 at Koutroulou Magoula (Greece). Antiquity 89 (2015), 1034--1050.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Park, T. J. Nam, and K. Ch. Shi. 2006. Designing an immersive tour experience system for cultural tour sites. In Proceedings of Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'06). 1193--1198. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Pietroni, A. Pagano, and C. Rufa. 2013. The Etruscanning project: Gesture-based interaction and user experience in the virtual reconstruction of the Regolini-Galassi tomb. In Proceedings of the Digital Heritage International Congress. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA.Google Scholar
- E. Pietroni, A. Pagano, and C. Poli. 2016a. Tiber Valley Virtual Museum: User experience evaluation in the National Etruscan Museum of Villa Giulia. In Proceedings of the 24th WSCG Conference on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision (WSCG’16).Google Scholar
- E. Pietroni, A. Pagano, M. Amadei, and F. Galiff. 2016b. Livia's Villa Reloaded Virtual Museum: User experience evaluation. In Proceedings of the 9th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation.Google Scholar
- B. J. Pine and J. H. Gilmore. 1999. The Experience Economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- L. Pujol. 2011. Realism in Virtual Reality applications for Cultural Heritage. International Journal of Virtual Reality 10, 3 (2011), 41--49.Google Scholar
- L. Pujol. 2017a. Introducing “Çatalhöyükness.” Çatalhöyük Research Project. Retrieved January 7, 2019 from http://www.catalhoyuk.com/tr/node/725.Google Scholar
- L. Pujol. 2017b. “3D·CoD”: A new methodology for the design of virtual reality-mediated experiences in digital archaeology. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 4 (2017b), Article 16.Google Scholar
- L. Pujol. 2018. Cultural presence in virtual archaeology: An exploratory analysis of factors. MIT Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 26, 3 (2018), 247--263. Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Pujol and E. Champion. 2012. Evaluating presence in cultural heritage projects. International Journal of Heritage Studies 18, 1 (2012), 83--102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Pujol and M. Economou. 2008. Evaluation research of the use of interactive displays at the Foundation of the Hellenic World (Athens). Unpublished report. Department of Cultural Technology and Communication. University of the Aegean.Google Scholar
- L. Pujol and M. Economou. 2009. Worth a thousand words? The usefulness of immersive Virtual Reality for learning in cultural heritage settings. International Journal of Architectural Computing 7, 1 (2009), 157--176.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Rahaman and B. K. Tan. 2011. Interpreting digital heritage: A conceptual model with end-users’ perspective. International Journal of Architectural Computing 9, 1 (2011), 99--114.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Reunanen, L. Diaz, and T. Horttana. 2015. A holistic user-centered approach to immersive digital cultural heritage installations: Case Vrouw Maria. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 7, 4 (2015), Article 24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Riva, G. Castelnuovo, A. Gaggioli, and F. Mantovani. 2002. Towards a cultural approach to Presence. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Presence. 305--309.Google Scholar
- M. M. Schaper, M. Santos, L. Malinverni, J. Zerbini, and N. Pares. 2018. Learning about the past through situatedness, embodied exploration and digital augmentation of cultural heritage sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 114 (2018), 36--50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Schofield (Ed.). 2014. Who Needs Experts? Counter-Mapping Cultural Heritage. Ashgate.Google Scholar
- R. Schroeder. 2002. Co-presence and interaction in virtual environments: An overview of the range of issues. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Presence. ACM, New York, NY, 274--295.Google Scholar
- T. Schubert, F. Friedmann, and H. Regenbrecht. 2001. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 10 (2001), 266--281. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Slater and S. Wilbur. 1997. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence 6, 6 (1997), 603--616. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Spagnolli, D. Varotto, and G. Mantovani. 2003. An ethnographic, action-based approach to human experience in virtual environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59 (2003), 797--822. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Steuer. 1992. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication 42, 4 (1992), 73--93.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Swinth and J. Blascovich. 2002. Perceiving and responding to others: Human-human and human-computer social interaction in collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Presence. ACM, New York, NY, 310--340.Google Scholar
- J. Urry and J. Larsen. 2011. The Tourist Gaze 3.0. Sage Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar
- D. Villani, C. Repetto, P. Cipresso, and G. Riva. 2012. May I experience more Presence in doing the same thing in Virtual Reality than in reality? An answer from a simulated job interview. Interacting with Computers 24, 4 (2012), 265--272. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Virtual Multimodal Museum. 2017. Ullastret, 250 B.C. A Virtual Reconstruction of an Iron Age Town. ViMM Platform. Retrieved January 7, 2019 from http://www.vi-mm.eu/2017/03/13/ullastret-250-b-c-a-virtual-reconstruction-of-an-iron-age-town/.Google Scholar
- D. Waller and E. R. Bachman. 2006. The borderline of science: On the value of factor analysis for understanding presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 15, 2 (2006), 235--244. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Winn. 1993. A conceptual basis for educational applications of Virtual Reality. Report No. TR-93-9. Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington.Google Scholar
- B. G. Witmer and M. J. Singer. 1998. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7 (1998), 225--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Woolford and S. Dunn. 2013. Experimental archaeology and games: Challenges of inhabiting virtual heritage. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 6, 4 (2013), Article 16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Wright and J. McCarthy. 2010. Experience-Centered Design: Designers, Users, and Communities in Dialogue. Morgan 8 Claypool, San Rafael, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Zatóri. 2013. Tourism Experience Creation From a Business Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Economic Geography and Future Studies, Competence Centre for Tourism, Corvinius University of Budapest.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Did We Just Travel to the Past? Building and Evaluating With Cultural Presence Different Modes of VR-Mediated Experiences in Virtual Archaeology
Recommendations
Using Presence Questionnaires in Virtual Reality
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsVirtual Reality (VR) is gaining increasing importance in science, education, and entertainment. A fundamental characteristic of VR is creating presence, the experience of 'being' or 'acting', when physically situated in another place. Measuring presence ...
Do VR and AR versions of an immersive cultural experience engender different user experiences?
AbstractAlthough Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR) user experiences have received large amounts of recent research interest, a direct comparison of different immersive technologies' user experiences has not often been conducted. ...
Highlights- Compared user experiences of one VR and two AR versions of a UK gallery experience.
Cultural presence in virtual archaeology: An exploratory analysis of factors
Shared between Human-Computer Interaction and Cultural Heritage, the concept of Cultural Presence may provide an encompassing theoretical and methodological framework for Virtual Archaeology. The factors underlying presence have been extensively ...
Comments