skip to main content
10.1145/3230833.3230868acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaresConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Stealthy Attacks on Smart Grid PMU State Estimation

Published:27 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smart grids require communication networks for supervision functions and control operations. With this they become attractive targets for attackers. In newer power grids, State Estimation (SE) is often performed based on Kalman Filters (KFs) to deal with noisy measurement data and detect Bad Data (BD) due to failures in the measurement system. Nevertheless, in a setting where attackers can gain access to modify sensor data, they can exploit the fact that SE is used to process the data. In this paper, we show how an attacker can modify Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU) sensor data in a way that it remains undetected in the state estimation process. We show how anomaly detection methods based on innovation gain fail if an attacker is aware of the state estimation and uses the right strategy to circumvent detection.

References

  1. Ettore Bompard, Tao Huang, Yingjun Wu, and Mihai Cremenescu. Classification and trend analysis of threats origins to the security of power systems. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 50:50--64, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. Mohammadi and S. Mehraeen. PMU Optimal Placement using sensitivity analysis for power systems fault location. In 2015 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC), pages 244--249, Oct 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. European Committee for Electro technical Standardization CENELEC. Standard EN 50160 - Voltage Characteristics in Public Distribution Systems. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Greg Welch and Gary Bishop. An Introduction to the Kalman Filter. Technical report, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Zhang, G. Welch, G. Bishop, and Z. Huang. A Two-Stage Kalman Filter Approach for Robust and Real-Time Power System State Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 5(2):629--636, April 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Augustin Soule, Kavé Salamatian, and Nina Taft. Combining Filtering and Statistical Methods for Anomaly Detection. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, IMC '05, pages 31--31, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2005. USENIX Association. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Pignati, L. Zanni, S. Sarri, R. Cherkaoui, J. Y. Le Boudec, and M. Paolone. A pre-estimation filtering process of bad data for linear power systems state estimators using PMUs. In 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference, pages 1--8, Aug 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. G. Moller, M. Sorensen, H. Johansson, and J. Ostergaard. Detecting topological errors with pre-estimation filtering of bad data in wide-area measurements. In 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech, pages 1--6, June 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. Barreto, A. Suresh, and J. Y. Le Boudec. Cyber-attack on packet-based time synchronization protocols: The undetectable delay box. In 2016 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, pages 1--6, May 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Barreto Andrade, M. Pignati, G. Dan, M. Paolone, and J. Y. Le Boudec. Undetectable PMU timing-attack on linear state-estimation by using rank-1 approximation. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, pages 1--1, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Ashok, M. Govindarasu, and V. Ajjarapu. Online detection of stealthy false data injection attacks in power system state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(3):1636--1646, May 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Dan and H. Sandberg. Stealth attacks and protection schemes for state estimators in power systems. In 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications, pages 214--219, Oct 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. ECOLE POLYTECHNIQUE FEDERALE DE LAUSANNE - EPFL. Smart Grid and PMU measurements. Available at https://smartgrid.epfl.ch/?q=monitoring.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. IEEE Standard for Synchrophasor Measurements for Power Systems. IEEE Std C37.118.1-2011 (Revision of IEEE Std C37.118-2005), pages 1--61, Dec 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. IEEE Standard for Synchrophasor Measurements for Power Systems -- Amendment 1: Modification of Selected Performance Requirements. IEEE Std C37.118.1a-2014 (Amendment to IEEE Std C37118.1-2011), pages 1--25, April 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. P. Romano and M. Paolone. Enhanced Interpolated-DFT for Synchrophasor Estimation in FPGAs: Theory, Implementation, and Validation of a PMU Prototype. IEEE Tran. on Instrumentation and Measurement, 63(12):2824--2836, Dec 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. IEEE Standard for Synchrophasor Data Transfer for Power Systems. IEEE Std C37.118.2-2011 (Revision of IEEE Std C37.118-2005), pages 1--53, Dec 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Pignati, M. Popovic, S. Barreto, R. Cherkaoui, G. Dario Flores, J. Y. Le Boudec, M. Mohiuddin, M. Paolone, P. Romano, S. Sarri, T. Tesfay, D. C. Tomozei, and L. Zanni. Real-time state estimation of the EPFL-campus medium-voltage grid by using PMUs. In 2015 IEEE Power Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), pages 1--5, Feb 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. R. Langner. Stuxnet: Dissecting a cyberwarfare weapon. IEEE Security Privacy, 9(3):49--51, May 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Robert M. Lee, Michael J. Assante, and Tim Conway. Analysis of the Cyber Attack on the Ukrainian Power Grid. Technical report, SANS ICS and E-ISAC, March 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Blake Johnson, Dan Caban, Marina Krotofil, Dan Scali, Nathan Brubaker, and Christopher Glyer. Attackers Deploy New ICS Attack Framework "TRITON" and Cause Operational Disruption to Critical Infrastructure. https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2017/12/attackers-deploy-new-ics-attack-framework-triton.html. Online; accessed March 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarita Paudel, Paul Smith, and Tanja Zseby. Data Integrity Attacks in Smart Grid Wide Area Monitoring. In 4th International Symposium for ICS & SCADA Cyber Security Research 2016 (ICS-CSR 2016), Belfast, UK, August 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A.R. Bergen and V Vittal. Power Systems Analysis. Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorenzo Zanni. Power System Estimation based on PMUs-Static and Dynamic Approaches from Theory to Real Implementation. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Staliani Sarri. Methods and Performance Assessment of PMU-based Real-Time State Estimation of Active Distribution Networks. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Robert Grover Brown and Patrick Y.C. Hwang. Introduction to Random Signals and Applied Kalman Filtering with Matlab Exercises. John Wiley and Sons, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. L. Zanni, S. Sarri, M. Pignati, R. Cherkaoui, and M. Paolone. Probabilistic assessment of the process-noise covariance matrix of discrete Kalman filter state estimation of active distribution networks. In 2014 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS), pages 1--6, July 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. S. Sarri, L. Zanni, M. Popovic, J. Y. Le Boudec, and M. Paolone. Performance Assessment of Linear State Estimators Using Synchrophasor Measurements. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 65(3):535--548, March 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. F. N. Chowdhury, J. P. Christensen, and J. L. Aravena. Power system fault detection and state estimation using kalman filter with hypothesis testing. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 6(3):1025--1030, Jul 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. A. M. L. da Silva, M. B. D. C. Filho, and J. M. C. Cantera. An efficient dynamic state estimation algorithm including bad data processing. IEEE Power Engineering Review, PER-7(11):49--49, Nov 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ARES '18: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security
    August 2018
    603 pages
    ISBN:9781450364485
    DOI:10.1145/3230833

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 August 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ARES '18 Paper Acceptance Rate128of260submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate228of451submissions,51%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader