skip to main content
10.1145/3230833.3232813acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaresConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digital Forensics in the Next Five Years

Published:27 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cyber forensics has encountered major obstacles over the last decade and is at a crossroads. This paper presents data that was obtained during the National Workshop on Redefining Cyber Forensics (NWRCF) on May 23-24, 2017 supported by the National Science Foundation and organized by the University of New Haven. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from twenty-four cyber forensics expert panel members. This work identified important themes that need to be addressed by the community, focusing on (1) where the domain currently is; (2) where it needs to go and; (3) steps needed to improve it. Furthermore, based on the results, we articulate (1) the biggest anticipated challenges the domain will face in the next five years; (2) the most important cyber forensics research opportunities in the next five years and; (3) the most important job-ready skills that need to be addressed by higher education curricula over the next five years. Lastly, we present the key issues and recommendations deliberated by the expert panel. Overall results indicated that a more active and coherent group needs to be formed in the cyber forensics community, with opportunities for continuous reassessment and improvement processes in place.

References

  1. Nicole Beebe. 2009. Digital Forensic Research: The Good, the Bad and the Unaddressed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 17--36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. National Science Foundation. 2018. GenCyber. (2018). https://www.gen-cyber.com/about/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Simson L Garfinkel. 2010. Digital forensics research: The next 10 years. digital investigation 7 (2010), S64--S73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cinthya Grajeda, Frank Breitinger, and Ibrahim Baggili. 2017. Availability of datasets for digital forensics--And what is missing. Digital Investigation 22 (2017), S94--S105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Vikram S Harichandran, Frank Breitinger, Ibrahim Baggili, and Andrew Marrington. 2016. A cyber forensics needs analysis survey: Revisiting the domain's needs a decade later. Computers & Security 57 (2016), 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jim Lyle. 2012. Computer Forensics Tool Testing. Forensics@ NIST (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kara Nance, Brian Hay, and Matt Bishop. 2009. Digital forensics: defining a research agenda. In System Sciences, 2009. HICSS'09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gary Palmer and others. 2001. A road map for digital forensic research. In First Digital Forensic Research Workshop, Utica, New York. 27--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Golden G Richard IE and Vassil Roussev. 2006. Next-generation digital forensics. Commun. ACM 49, 2 (2006), 76--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Marcus K Rogers and Kate Seigfried. 2004. The future of computer forensics: a needs analysis survey. Computers & Security 23, 1 (2004), 12--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Robert J Walls, Brian Neil Levine, Marc Liberatore, and Clay Shields. 2011. Effective Digital Forensics Research Is Investigator-Centric. In HotSec. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ARES '18: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security
    August 2018
    603 pages
    ISBN:9781450364485
    DOI:10.1145/3230833

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 August 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ARES '18 Paper Acceptance Rate128of260submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate228of451submissions,51%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader