ABSTRACT
Cyber forensics has encountered major obstacles over the last decade and is at a crossroads. This paper presents data that was obtained during the National Workshop on Redefining Cyber Forensics (NWRCF) on May 23-24, 2017 supported by the National Science Foundation and organized by the University of New Haven. Qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed from twenty-four cyber forensics expert panel members. This work identified important themes that need to be addressed by the community, focusing on (1) where the domain currently is; (2) where it needs to go and; (3) steps needed to improve it. Furthermore, based on the results, we articulate (1) the biggest anticipated challenges the domain will face in the next five years; (2) the most important cyber forensics research opportunities in the next five years and; (3) the most important job-ready skills that need to be addressed by higher education curricula over the next five years. Lastly, we present the key issues and recommendations deliberated by the expert panel. Overall results indicated that a more active and coherent group needs to be formed in the cyber forensics community, with opportunities for continuous reassessment and improvement processes in place.
- Nicole Beebe. 2009. Digital Forensic Research: The Good, the Bad and the Unaddressed. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 17--36.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation. 2018. GenCyber. (2018). https://www.gen-cyber.com/about/Google Scholar
- Simson L Garfinkel. 2010. Digital forensics research: The next 10 years. digital investigation 7 (2010), S64--S73. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cinthya Grajeda, Frank Breitinger, and Ibrahim Baggili. 2017. Availability of datasets for digital forensics--And what is missing. Digital Investigation 22 (2017), S94--S105. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vikram S Harichandran, Frank Breitinger, Ibrahim Baggili, and Andrew Marrington. 2016. A cyber forensics needs analysis survey: Revisiting the domain's needs a decade later. Computers & Security 57 (2016), 1--13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jim Lyle. 2012. Computer Forensics Tool Testing. Forensics@ NIST (2012).Google Scholar
- Kara Nance, Brian Hay, and Matt Bishop. 2009. Digital forensics: defining a research agenda. In System Sciences, 2009. HICSS'09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gary Palmer and others. 2001. A road map for digital forensic research. In First Digital Forensic Research Workshop, Utica, New York. 27--30.Google Scholar
- Golden G Richard IE and Vassil Roussev. 2006. Next-generation digital forensics. Commun. ACM 49, 2 (2006), 76--80. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcus K Rogers and Kate Seigfried. 2004. The future of computer forensics: a needs analysis survey. Computers & Security 23, 1 (2004), 12--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert J Walls, Brian Neil Levine, Marc Liberatore, and Clay Shields. 2011. Effective Digital Forensics Research Is Investigator-Centric. In HotSec. Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
IT forensics: 22 years on
This paper examines the progress made in the area of 'digital forensics' and 'cybercrime investigation' since the author's first involvement in the subject in 1986. At that time, hard disk technology was in its relative infancy and examination of ...
The future of computer forensics: a needs analysis survey
The current study was a pilot study and attempted to add to the growing body of knowledge regarding inherent issues in computer forensics. The study consisted of an Internet-based survey that asked respondents to identify the top five issues in computer ...
Interdisciplinary minor in digital forensics, security and law
SIGITE '05: Proceedings of the 6th conference on Information technology educationDigital forensics is playing a more prominent role in law enforcement, network security, and information assurance. The field of study encompasses not just digital evidence, but also the areas of cyber law, sociology, and security to name a few. Its ...
Comments