skip to main content
10.1145/3230977.3231003acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

How Mother and Father Support Affect Youths' Interest in Computer Science

Published:08 August 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Parental support is a predictor of children's career interest and aspirations. However, mother and father support affects youth career choices differently. To understand how perceived mothers' and fathers' support affect career interest in computer science (CS), we developed two path models using both mother and father support gains to predict youths' interest in CS. We hypothesized that perceived father's and mother's support would relate to youths' interest in CS via youths' perception of CS utility value as a mediator. We found that both mother and father support leads to interest in CS. However, father support was found to affect CS interest via the mediator utility-value beliefs. To provide explanations for these differences we used student interview data to explore how participants in our study perceived parental support.

References

  1. Annette E. Alliman-Brissett, Sherri L. Turner, and Thomas M. Skovholt . 2004. Parent support and African American adolescents' career self-efficacy. Professional School Counseling Vol. 7, 3 (2004), 124--133.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Catherine Ashcraft, Elizabeth Eger, and Michelle Friend . 2012. Girls in IT: the facts. Technical Report. Boulder, CO.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdulkadir Bahar and Tufan Adiguzel . 2016. Analysis of Factors Influencing Interest in STEM Career : Comparison between American and Turkish High School ... Analysis of Factors Influencing Interest in STEM Career : Comparison between American and Turkish High School Students with High Ability. Journal of STEM Education Vol. 17, 3 (2016), 64--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics . 2015. Household Data. Technical Report. 1--10 pages.deftempurl%http://www.bls.gov/Cps/Cpsaat11.Pdf tempurlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheryl Carrico and Chosang Tendhar . 2012. The Use of the Social Cognitive Career Theory to Predict Engineering Students' Motivation in the Produced Program. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jody Clarke-Midura, Frederick Poole, Katarina Pantic, and Vicki Allan . 2017. Playing Mentor: A New Strategy for Recruiting Young Women into Computer Science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering Vol. 23, 3 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jody Clarke-Midura, Frederick Poole, Katarina Pantic, Megan Hamilton, Chongning Sun, and Vicki Allan . 2018. How Near Peer Mentoring Affects Middle School Mentees Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 664--669. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Michael Cole . 1998. Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jill Denner . 2011. What Predicts Middle School Girls' Interest in Computing? International Journal of Gender Science and Technology Vol. 3, 1 (2011), 53--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jacquelynne Eccles . 2009. Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist Vol. 44, 2 (2009), 78--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jacquelynne S Eccles . 1994. Understanding women's educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly Vol. 18 (1994), 585--609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jacquelynne S. Eccles . 2015. Gendered Socialization of STEM Interests in the Family. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology Vol. 7, 2 (2015), 116--132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacquelynne S Eccles and Rena D Harold . 1993. Parent-school involvement during the early adolescent years. Teachers College Record Vol. 94, 3 (1993), 568--587. deftempurl%https://doi.org/0161--4681--93/9403/568$1.25/0showDOItempurlshoweprint{arxiv}NIHMS150003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Elizabeth Fennema and Julia A. Sherman . 2017. Mathematics Attitudes Scales : Instruments Designed to Measure Attitudes toward the Learning of Mathematics by Females and Males Author ( s ): Elizabeth Fennema and Julia A . Sherman Source : Journal for Research in Mathematics Education ,. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Vol. 7, 5 (2017), 324--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tamara R. Ferry, Nadya A. Fouad, and Philip L. Smith . 2000. The Role of Family Context in a Social Cognitive Model for Career-Related Choice Behavior: A Math and Science Perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior Vol. 57, 3 (2000), 348--364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Deborah Fields, Lisa Quirke, Tori Horton, Jason Maughan, Xavier Velasquez, Janell Amely, and Katarina Pantic . 2016. Working toward equity in a constructionist Scratch camp: Lessons learned in applying a studio design model. In Constructionism in Action, bibfieldeditorArnan Sipitakiat and Nalin Tutiyaphuengprasert (Eds.). Bangkok, Thailand, 291--298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Janet L. Gates . 2002. Women's career influences in traditional and nontraditional fields. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Shuchi Grover, Roy Pea, and Stephen Cooper . 2015. Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer Science Education Vol. 25, 2 (2015), 199--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Judith M. Harackiewicz, Christopher S. Rozek, Chris S. Hulleman, and Janet S. Hyde . 2012. Helping Parents to Motivate Adolescents in Mathematics and Science: An Experimental Test of a Utility-Value Intervention. Psychological Science Vol. 23, 8 (2012), 899--906.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Nancy E. Hill and Ming Te Wang . 2015. From middle school to college: Developing aspirations, promoting engagement, and indirect pathways from parenting to post high school enrollment. Developmental Psychology Vol. 51, 2 (2015), 224--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Yingdan Huang, Jane Meyers, Wendy Dubow, Zhen Wu, and Michael Eisenberg . 2013. Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age. In Ubiquitous and Mobile Learning in the Digital Age, bibfieldeditorDemetrios G. Sampson, Pedro Isaias, Dirk Ifenthaler, and Michael Spector (Eds.). Springer-Verlag New York, New York, NY, 215--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kathleen M. Jodl, Alice Michael, Oksana Malanchuk, Jacquelynne S. Eccles, and Arnold Sameroff . 2001. Parents' Roles in Shaping Early Adolescents' Occupational Aspirations. Child Development Vol. 72, 4 (2001), 1247--1266.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ciltlin Kelleher and Randy Pausch . 2007. Using storytelling to motivate programming. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM Vol. 50, 7 (2007), 59--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jordana Kerr, Mary Chou, Reilly Ellis, and Caitlin Kelleher . 2013. Setting the scene: Scaffolding stories to benefit middle school students learning to program. In 2013 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing. 95--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. D Midian Kurland and Roy D Pea . 1985. Children's mental models of recursive LOGO programs. Journal of Educational Computing Research Vol. 1, 2 (1985), 235--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. John Maloney, Kylie Peppler, Yasmin B. Kafai, Mitchel Resnick, and Natalie Rusk . 2008. Programming by choice: urban youth learning programming with scratch Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education. Portland, OR, USA, 367--371. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Christine McLachlan, Annemieke Craig, and Jo Coldwell . 2010. Student perceptions of ICT: A gendered analysis. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Australasian Conference on Computing Education, Vol. Vol. 103. Brisbane, Australia, 127--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Orni Meerbaum-Salant, Michal Armoni, and Mordechai (Moti) Ben-Ari . 2013. Learning computer science concepts with Scratch. Computer Science Education Vol. 23, 3 (2013), 239--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Chrystalla Mouza, Alison Marzocchi, Yi Cheng Pan, and Lori Pollock . 2016. Development, implementation, and outcomes of an equitable computer science after-school program: Findings from middle-school students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education Vol. 48, 2 (2016), 84--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. National Science Foundation . 2017. Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2017 Report. Technical Report. 1--21 pages.deftempurl%https://doi.org/Special Report NSF 17--310showDOItempurlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Luther B Otto . 2000. Youth Perspectives on Parental Career Influence. Journal of Career Development Vol. 27, 2 (2000), 111--118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sylvia Palmer and Larry Cochran . 1988. Parents as Agents of Career Development. Journal of Counseling Psychology Vol. 35, 1 (1988), 71--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ramona Palos and Loredana Drobot . 2010. The impact of family influence on the career choice of adolescents. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 2, 2 (2010), 3407--3411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Katarina Pantic, Deborah A. Fields, and Lisa Quirke . 2016. Studying situated learning in a constructionist programming camp Proceedings of the The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. Manchester, UK, 428--439. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. R Core Team . 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.deftempurl%https://www.R-project.org/ tempurlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Simon Lloyd D. Restubog, Afryll R. Florentino, and Patrick Raymund James M. Garcia . 2010. The mediating roles of career self-efficacy and career decidedness in the relationship between contextual support and persistence. Journal of Vocational Behavior Vol. 77, 2 (2010), 186--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Jacqueline C. Simpson . 2003. Mom matters: Maternal influence on the choice of academic major. Sex Roles Vol. 48, 9--10 (2003), 447--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Sherri Turner and Richard T. Lapan . 2002. Career self-efficacy and perceptions of parent support in adolescent career development. (2002), bibinfonumpages44--55 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Ioanna Vekiri and Anna Chronaki . 2008. Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers and Education Vol. 51, 3 (2008), 1392--1404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Allan Wigfield and Jacquelynne S Eccles . 2000. Expectancy--value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary educational psychology Vol. 25, 1 (2000), 68--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How Mother and Father Support Affect Youths' Interest in Computer Science

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ICER '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
        August 2018
        307 pages
        ISBN:9781450356282
        DOI:10.1145/3230977

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 August 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ICER '18 Paper Acceptance Rate28of125submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        ICER 2024
        ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
        August 13 - 15, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader