skip to main content
research-article

Exploring Social Recommendations with Visual Diversity-Promoting Interfaces

Published:09 August 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The beyond-relevance objectives of recommender systems have been drawing more and more attention. For example, a diversity-enhanced interface has been shown to associate positively with overall levels of user satisfaction. However, little is known about how users adopt diversity-enhanced interfaces to accomplish various real-world tasks. In this article, we present two attempts at creating a visual diversity-enhanced interface that presents recommendations beyond a simple ranked list. Our goal was to design a recommender system interface to help users explore the different relevance prospects of recommended items in parallel and to stress their diversity. Two within-subject user studies in the context of social recommendation at academic conferences were conducted to compare our visual interfaces. Results from our user study show that the visual interfaces significantly reduced the exploration efforts required for given tasks and helped users to perceive the recommendation diversity. We show that the users examined a diverse set of recommended items while experiencing an improvement in overall user satisfaction. Also, the users’ subjective evaluations show significant improvement in many user-centric metrics. Experiences are discussed that shed light on avenues for future interface designs.

References

  1. Jisun An, Daniele Quercia, and Jon Crowcroft. 2013. Why individuals seek diverse opinions (or why they don’t). In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference. ACM, 15--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fabiano M. Belém, Carolina S. Batista, Rodrygo L. T. Santos, Jussara M. Almeida, and Marcos A. Gonçalves. 2016. Beyond relevance: Explicitly promoting novelty and diversity in tag recommendation. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 7, 3 (2016), 26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Toine Bogers. 2018. Tag-based recommendation. In Social Information Access. Springer, 441--479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dirk Bollen, Bart P. Knijnenburg, Martijn C. Willemsen, and Mark Graus. 2010. Understanding choice overload in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 63--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Svetlin Bostandjiev, John O’Donovan, and Tobias Höllerer. 2012. TasteWeights: A visual interactive hybrid recommender system. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 35--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Engin Bozdag and Jeroen van den Hoven. 2015. Breaking the filter bubble: Democracy and design. Ethics and Information Technology 17, 4 (2015), 249--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Peter Brusilovsky, Jung Sun Oh, Claudia López, Denis Parra, and Wei Jeng. 2016. Linking information and people in a social system for academic conferences. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia (2016), 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruno Cardoso, Gayane Sedrakyan, Francisco Gutiérrez, Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Katrien Verbert. 2018. IntersectionExplorer, a multi-perspective approach for exploring recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jilin Chen, Werner Geyer, Casey Dugan, Michael Muller, and Ido Guy. 2009. Make new friends, but keep the old: Recommending people on social networking sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Henriette Cramer, Vanessa Evers, Satyan Ramlal, Maarten Van Someren, Lloyd Rutledge, Natalia Stash, Lora Aroyo, and Bob Wielinga. 2008. The effects of transparency on trust in and acceptance of a content-based art recommender. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18, 5 (2008), 455. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Paolo Cremonesi, Franca Garzotto, and Roberto Turrin. 2012. Investigating the persuasion potential of recommender systems from a quality perspective: An empirical study. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2, 2 (2012), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Tuan Nhon Dang and Leland Wilkinson. 2014. Scagexplorer: Exploring scatterplots by their scagnostics. In Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), 2014 IEEE Pacific. IEEE, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Stavin Deeswe and Raymond Kosala. 2015. An integrated search interface with 3D visualization. Procedia Computer Science 59 (2015), 483--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Cecilia di Sciascio, Vedran Sabol, and Eduardo E. Veas. 2016. Rank as you go: User-driven exploration of search results. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 118--129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Michael D. Ekstrand, F. Maxwell Harper, Martijn C. Willemsen, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2014. User perception of differences in recommender algorithms. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 161--168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Michael D. Ekstrand, Daniel Kluver, F. Maxwell Harper, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2015. Letting users choose recommender algorithms: An experimental study. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Siamak Faridani, Ephrat Bitton, Kimiko Ryokai, and Ken Goldberg. 2010. Opinion space: A scalable tool for browsing online comments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1175--1184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Minos N. Garofalakis, Rajeev Rastogi, and Kyuseok Shim. 1999. SPIRIT: Sequential pattern mining with regular expression constraints. In VLDB, Vol. 99. 7--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Mouzhi Ge, Carla Delgado-Battenfeld, and Dietmar Jannach. 2010. Beyond accuracy: Evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 257--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dorota Glowacka, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Ksenia Konuyshkova, Samuel Kaski, and Giulio Jacucci. 2013. Directing exploratory search: Reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 117--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Brynjar Gretarsson, John O’Donovan, Svetlin Bostandjiev, Christopher Hall, and Tobias Höllerer. 2010. Smallworlds: Visualizing social recommendations. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 29. Wiley Online Library, 833--842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Julio Guerra, Shaghayegh Sahebi, Yu-Ru Lin, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2014. The problem solving genome: Analyzing sequential patterns of student work with parameterized exercises. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM'14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pankaj Gupta, Ashish Goel, Jimmy Lin, Aneesh Sharma, Dong Wang, and Reza Zadeh. 2013. WTF: The who to follow service at Twitter. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 505--514. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ido Guy. 2015. Social recommender systems. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 511--543.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ido Guy. 2018. People Recommendation on Social Media. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 570--623.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ido Guy, Inbal Ronen, and Eric Wilcox. 2009. Do you know?: Recommending people to invite into your social network. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 77--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ido Guy, Sigalit Ur, Inbal Ronen, Adam Perer, and Michal Jacovi. 2011. Do you want to know?: Recommending strangers in the enterprise. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2000. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rong Hu and Pearl Pu. 2011. Helping users perceive recommendation diversity. In DiveRS@ RecSys. 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Marius Kaminskas and Derek Bridge. 2016. Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: A survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 7, 1, Article 2 (Dec. 2016), 42 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Marius Kaminskas and Derek Bridge. 2016. Diversity, serendipity, novelty, and coverage: A survey and empirical analysis of beyond-accuracy objectives in recommender systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 7, 1 (2016), 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Hannah Kim, Jaegul Choo, Haesun Park, and Alex Endert. 2016. Interaxis: Steering scatterplot axes via observation-level interaction. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 22, 1 (2016), 131--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Khalil Klouche, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Diogo Cabral, Salvatore Andolina, Andrea Bellucci, and Giulio Jacucci. 2015. Designing for exploratory search on touch devices. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4189--4198. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Khalil Klouche, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Luana Micallef, Salvatore Andolina, and Giulio Jacucci. 2017. Visual re-ranking for multi-aspect information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. ACM, 57--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Daniel Kluver, Michael D. Ekstrand, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2018. Rating-based collaborative filtering: Algorithms and evaluation. In Social Information Access. Springer, 344--390.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Bart P. Knijnenburg, Svetlin Bostandjiev, John O’Donovan, and Alfred Kobsa. 2012. Inspectability and control in social recommenders. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Recommender System. 43--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Pigi Kouki, James Schaffer, Jay Pujara, John O’Donovan, and Lise Getoor. 2017. User preferences for hybrid explanations. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 84--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Johannes Kunkel, Benedikt Loepp, and Jürgen Ziegler. 2017. A 3D item space visualization for presenting and manipulating user preferences in collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 3--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Danielle Lee and Peter Brusilovsky. 2018. Recommendations based on social links. In Social Information Access. Springer, 391--440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Q. Vera Liao and Wai-Tat Fu. 2013. Beyond the filter bubble: Interactive effects of perceived threat and topic involvement on selective exposure to information. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2359--2368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Sean M. McNee, John Riedl, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2006. Being accurate is not enough: How accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In CHI’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1097--1101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Jennifer Moody and David H. Glass. 2016. A novel classification framework for evaluating individual and aggregate diversity in top-N recommendations. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) 7, 3 (2016), 42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Sean A. Munson and Paul Resnick. 2010. Presenting diverse political opinions: How and how much. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1457--1466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Mark E. J. Newman. 2001. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Review E 64, 2 (2001), 025102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Tien T. Nguyen, Pik-Mai Hui, F. Maxwell Harper, Loren Terveen, and Joseph A. Konstan. 2014. Exploring the filter bubble: The effect of using recommender systems on content diversity. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 677--686. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. John O’Donovan, Brynjar Gretarsson, Svetlin Bostandjiev, Tobias Hollerer, and Barry Smyth. 2009. A visual interface for social information filtering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, 2009 (CSE’09). Vol. 4. IEEE, 74--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. John O’Donovan, Barry Smyth, Brynjar Gretarsson, Svetlin Bostandjiev, and Tobias Höllerer. 2008. PeerChooser: Visual interactive recommendation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1085--1088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Michael P. O’Mahony and Barry Smyth. 2018. From opinions to recommendations. In Social Information Access. Springer, 480--509.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Valeria Orso, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Jukka Leino, Luciano Gamberini, and Giulio Jacucci. 2017. Overlaying social information: The effects on users’ search and information-selection behavior. Information Processing 8 Management 53, 6 (2017), 1269--1286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Anshul Vikram Pandey, Josua Krause, Cristian Felix, Jeremy Boy, and Enrico Bertini. 2016. Towards understanding human similarity perception in the analysis of large sets of scatter plots. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3659--3669. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Denis Parra and Peter Brusilovsky. 2015. User-controllable personalization: A case study with SetFusion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 78 (2015), 43--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Pearl Pu, Li Chen, and Rong Hu. 2011. A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 157--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Tuukka Ruotsalo, Jaakko Peltonen, Manuel Eugster, Dorota Głowacka, Ksenia Konyushkova, Kumaripaba Athukorala, Ilkka Kosunen, Aki Reijonen, Petri Myllymäki, Giulio Jacucci, et al. 2013. Directing exploratory search with interactive intent modeling. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information 8 Knowledge Management. ACM, 1759--1764. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. J. Ben Schafer, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2002. Meta-recommendation systems: User-controlled integration of diverse recommendations. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 43--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Rory L. L. Sie, Hendrik Drachsler, Marlies Bitter-Rijpkema, and Peter Sloep. 2012. To whom and why should I connect? Co-author recommendation based on powerful and similar peers. International Journal on Technology Enhanced Learning 4, 1/2 (2012), 121--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Jie Tang, Jing Zhang, Limin Yao, Juanzi Li, Li Zhang, and Zhong Su. 2008. Arnetminer: Extraction and mining of academic social networks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 990--998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Robert Tarjan. 1972. Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing 1, 2 (1972), 146--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Choon Hui Teo, Houssam Nassif, Daniel Hill, Sriram Srinivasan, Mitchell Goodman, Vijai Mohan, and S. V. N. Vishwanathan. 2016. Adaptive, personalized diversity for visual discovery. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 35--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Nina Tintarev. 2017. Presenting diversity aware recommendations: Making challenging news acceptable. The FATRec Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FATRec'17).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff. 2012. Evaluating the effectiveness of explanations for recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 4–5 (1 Oct. 2012), 399--439. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Chun-Hua Tsai. 2017. An interactive and interpretable interface for diversity in recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion (IUI’17 Companion). ACM, New York, 225--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Chun-Hua Tsai and Peter Brusilovsky. 2016. A personalized people recommender system using global search approach. IConference 2016 Proceedings (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Chun-Hua Tsai and Peter Brusilovsky. 2017. Enhancing recommendation diversity through a dual recommendation interface. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Chun-Hua Tsai and Peter Brusilovsky. 2017. Leveraging interfaces to improve recommendation diversity. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, 65--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Chun-Hua Tsai and Peter Brusilovsky. 2017. Providing control and transparency in a social recommender system for academic conferences. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, 313--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Chun-Hua Tsai and Yu-Ru Lin. 2016. Tracing and predicting collaboration for junior scholars. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 375--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Katrien Verbert, Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Erik Duval. 2013. Visualizing recommendations to support exploration, transparency and controllability. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 351--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Jesse Vig, Shilad Sen, and John Riedl. 2012. The tag genome: Encoding community knowledge to support novel interaction. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2, 3 (2012), 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Weiquan Wang and Izak Benbasat. 2007. Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: Effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. Journal of Management Information Systems 23, 4 (2007), 217--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. David Wong, Siamak Faridani, Ephrat Bitton, Björn Hartmann, and Ken Goldberg. 2011. The diversity donut: Enabling participant control over the diversity of recommended responses. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1471--1476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Bo Xiao and Izak Benbasat. 2007. E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly 31, 1 (2007), 137--209. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Social Recommendations with Visual Diversity-Promoting Interfaces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
      ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems  Volume 10, Issue 1
      Special Issue on IUI 2018
      March 2020
      347 pages
      ISSN:2160-6455
      EISSN:2160-6463
      DOI:10.1145/3352585
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 August 2019
      • Revised: 1 July 2018
      • Accepted: 1 July 2018
      • Received: 1 May 2018
      Published in tiis Volume 10, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format