skip to main content
10.1145/3231644.3231682acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

An active viewing framework for video-based learning

Published: 26 June 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Video-based learning is most effective when students are engaged with video content; however, the literature has yet to identify students' viewing behaviors and ground them in theory. This paper addresses this need by introducing a framework of active viewing, which is situated in an established model of active learning to describe students' behaviors while learning from video. We conducted a field study with 460 undergraduates in an Applied Science course using a video player designed for active viewing to evaluate how students engage in passive and active video-based learning. The concept of active viewing, and the role of interactive, constructive, active, and passive behaviors in video-based learning, can be implemented in the design and evaluation of video players.

References

[1]
David Bargeron, Jonathan Grudin, Anoop Gupta, Elizabeth Sanocki, Francis Li, and Scott Leetiernan. 2002. Asynchronous collaboration around multimedia applied to on-demand education. Journal of Management Information Systems 18, 4 (2002), 117--145.
[2]
Michelene T H Chi. 2009. Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science 1, 1 (2009), 73--105.
[3]
Michelene T H Chi and Ruth Wylie. 2014. The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist 49, 4 (2014), 219--243.
[4]
Samuel Dodson, Ido Roll, Matthew Fong, Dongwook Yoon, Negar M. Harandi, and Sidney Fels. 2018. Active viewing: A study of video highlighting in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval. ACM, New York, NY, 237--240.
[5]
Brian Dorn, Larissa B Schroeder, and Adam Stankiewicz. 2015. Piloting TrACE: Exploring spatiotemporal anchored collaboration in asynchronous learning. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, 393--403.
[6]
Matthew Fong, Samuel Dodson, Xueqin Zhang, Ido Roll, and Sidney Fels. 2018. ViDeX: A platform for personalizing educational videos. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM, New York, NY, 331--332.
[7]
Elena L Glassman, Juho Kim, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2015. Mudslide: A spatially anchored census of student confusion for online lecture videos. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 1555--1564.
[8]
Richard R Hake. 1998. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics 66, 1 (1998), 64--74.
[9]
Catherine C Marshall. 1998. Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. ACM, New York, NY, 40--49.
[10]
Michael Prince. 2004. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 93, 3 (2004), 223--231.
[11]
Ido Roll and Philip H Winne. 2015. Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics 2, 1 (2015), 7--12.
[12]
Michele L Simpson and Sherrie L Nist. 1990. Textbook annotation: an effective and efficient study strategy for college students. Journal of Reading 34, 2 (1990), 122--129.
[13]
Dongsong Zhang, Lina Zhou, Robert O Briggs, and Jay F Nunamaker. 2006. Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management 43, 1 (2006), 15--27.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Cognitive engagement as a predictor of learning gain in Python programmingSmart Learning Environments10.1186/s40561-024-00330-911:1Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Video-based lecture engagement in a flipped classroom environmentBMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-024-06228-x24:1Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Students’ active cognitive engagement with instructional videos predicts STEM learningComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105050216:COnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
L@S '18: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale
June 2018
391 pages
ISBN:9781450358866
DOI:10.1145/3231644
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 June 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. active viewing
  2. annotation
  3. video-based learning

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

  • University of British Columbia Teaching and Learning Enhancement Fund
  • Microsoft Corporation
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Conference

L@S '18
L@S '18: Fifth (2018) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
June 26 - 28, 2018
London, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

L@S '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 24 of 58 submissions, 41%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)58
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 20 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Cognitive engagement as a predictor of learning gain in Python programmingSmart Learning Environments10.1186/s40561-024-00330-911:1Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
  • (2024)Video-based lecture engagement in a flipped classroom environmentBMC Medical Education10.1186/s12909-024-06228-x24:1Online publication date: 25-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Students’ active cognitive engagement with instructional videos predicts STEM learningComputers & Education10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105050216:COnline publication date: 17-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Impact of question presence and interactivity in instructional videos on student learningEducation and Information Technologies10.1007/s10639-024-12862-130:2(1635-1663)Online publication date: 5-Jul-2024
  • (2023)Exploring physical education teachers’ experiences with incorporating technology into instructionEdu Sportivo: Indonesian Journal of Physical Education10.25299/esijope.2023.vol4(3).129104:3(230-242)Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023
  • (2023)The effect of research video abstract presentation style on viewer comprehension and engagementProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval10.1145/3576840.3578326(394-400)Online publication date: 19-Mar-2023
  • (2023)FORTAGONO: A Model for the Technological Mediation of the Teaching and Learning ProcessesIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.325444111(64294-64323)Online publication date: 2023
  • (2022)Examining Students’ Perceptions towards Video-Based and Video-Assisted Active Learning Scenarios in Journalism and Communication CoursesEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1202007412:2(74)Online publication date: 21-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Highly Engaged Video-Watching Pattern in Asynchronous Online Pharmacology Course in Pre-clinical 4th-Year Medical Students Was Associated With a Good Self-Expectation, Understanding, and PerformanceFrontiers in Medicine10.3389/fmed.2021.7994128Online publication date: 21-Jan-2022
  • (2022)Authoring Virtual Peer Interactions for Lecture VideosExtended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491101.3519835(1-7)Online publication date: 27-Apr-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media