skip to main content
10.1145/3231644.3231689acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A deep learning model for automatic evaluation of academic engagement

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposed a deep learning model for automatic evaluation of academic engagement based on video data analysis. A coding system based on the BROMP standard for behavioral, emotional, and cognitive states was defined to code typical videos in an autonomous learning environment. Then after the key points of human skeletons were extracted from these videos using pose estimation technology, deep learning methods were used to realize the effective recognition and judgment of motion and emotions. Based on this, an analysis and evaluation of learners' learning states was accomplished, and a prototype of academic engagement evaluation system was successfully established eventually.

References

  1. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks{C}// International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc. 2012:1097--1105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Pang B, Zha K, Lu C. Human Action Adverb Recognition: ADHA Dataset and A Three-Stream Hybrid Model{J}. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.01144, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Pike G R. Measuring quality: A comparison of US News rankings and NSSE benchmarks{J}. Research in Higher Education, 2004, 45(2): 193--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fredricks J A, Blumenfeld P C, Paris A H. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence{J}. Review of educational research, 2004, 74(1): 59--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Donahue J, Anne Hendricks L, Guadarrama S, et al. Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2015: 2625--2634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gunnar Johansson. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for it is analysis. Perception and Psychophysics 14(2), pp 201--211, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Finlay K A. Quantifying school engagement: Research report{J}. Denver, CO: National Center for School Engagement, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Le Q V, Zou W Y, Yeung S Y, Ng A Y. Learning hierarchical invariant spatio-temporal features for action recognition with independent subspace analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Providence, RI: IEEE, 2011. 3361--3368 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Baker R S, Corbett A T, Koedinger K R, et al. Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students game the system{C}//Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2004: 383--390. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Wei S E, Ramakrishna V, Kanade T, et al. Convolutional pose machines{C}//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2016: 4724--4732.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ji S W, Xu W, Yang M, Yu K. 3D convolutional neural networks for human action recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2013, 35 (1): 221--231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Simon T, Joo H, Matthews I, et al. Hand keypoint detection in single images using multiview bootstrapping{C}//The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2017, 2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    L@S '18: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale
    June 2018
    391 pages
    ISBN:9781450358866
    DOI:10.1145/3231644

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 26 June 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    L@S '18 Paper Acceptance Rate24of58submissions,41%Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader