skip to main content
10.1145/3233824.3233854acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinteraccionConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Approach to Make Software Testing for Users with Down Syndrome a little more Pleasant

Published:12 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Evaluating software with users implies challenging tasks where users' abilities are sometimes taken to the limit. This process might turn a very unpleasant experience to users susceptible to anxiety and stress, such as users with Down syndrome. By consequence the poor performance of unpleasant users generates unreal results. We propose a gamified approach for software testing, which allows maintaining user's motivation and engagement with the test's activities, reducing anxiety and stress, having by consequence more reliable results. The gamified approach can be applied on any kind of software testing involving users, since it works over how the activities are presented to participants, once they have been defined according with the test goal. Results of the application, over 10 users with Down syndrome, suggest that the gamified approach maintains the emotional state of users in a positive way even when they made errors, got confused, or were forced to change/stop an activity.

References

  1. W. Barendregt, M. Bekker, D. Bouwhuis and E. Baauw, "Predicting effectiveness of children participants in user testing based on personality characteristics," Journal Behaviour & Information Technology, pp. 133--147, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Fajardo, L. Gaytán and M. Naftali, "Usability Techniques," in Proceedings of the 8th Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Antigua Guatemala, Guatemala, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Klemer, "Certification in Interaction Design:, Class Notes," 01 February 2018. {Online}. Available: https://www.coursera.org/learn/design-principles.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Kirijian, M. Myers and S. Charland, "Web Fun Central: online learning tools for individuals with Down syndrome," in Universal Usability: Designing Information Systems for Diverse User Populations, Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. Kumar, N. Karusala, S. Seth and B. Patra, "Usability, Tested?," INTERACTIONS, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 74--77, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. K. Werbach, "(Re)Defining Gamification: A Process Approach, Persuasive Technology," Persuasive Technology, vol. 8462, pp. 266--272, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Robson, K. Plangger, I. McCarthy and P. Leyland, "Game on: Engaging customers and employees through gamification," Business Horizons, pp. 26--36, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Y. Chee, Games-To-Teach or Games-To-Learn: Unlocking the Power of Digital Game-Based, Learning Through Performance, Springer Singapore, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Tondello and L. Nacke, "Gamification: Tools and Techniques for Motivating Users," Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. C25, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. G. Zichermann and C. Cunningham, Gamification by Design, Sebastopol, California, USA: O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. Muntean, "Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification," in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning, Romania, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. Dichev, D. Dicheva, G. Angelova and G. Agre, "From Gamification to Gameful Design and Gameful Experience in Learning," vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 80--100, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Huotari and J. Hamari, "A definition for gamification: anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature," Electron Markets, pp. 1--11, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Goshevski, J. Veljanoska and T. Hatziapostolou, "A Review of Gamification Platforms for Higher Education," in Proceedings of the 8th Balkan Conference in Informatics, Skopje, Macedonia, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. Hervas, D. Ruiz-Carrasco, T. Mondejar and J. Bravo, "Gamification mechanics for behavioral change: a systematic review and proposed taxonomy," in Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Barcelona, Spain, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. Chapman and L. Hesketh, "Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome," Journal: Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 84--95, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. P. Parker, Down Syndrome: A Bibliography and Dictionary for Physicians, Patients, and Genome Researchers., Icon Group International Inc., 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. Bruni, Fine Motor Skills for Children with Down Syndrome, Woodbine House Eds., 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J. Feng and J. Lazar, "Computer Usage by Children with Down Syndrome: Challenges and Future Research," ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, vol. 2, no. 3, p. Art. No. 13, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Lazar, L. Kumin and J. Feng, "Understanding the computer skills of adult expert users with down syndrome: an exploratory study," in International ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and Accessibility, New York, NY, USA., 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. W. H. O. WHO, "Informed Consent Form Templates," 10 8 2016. {Online}. Available: http://www.who.int/rpc/research_ethics/informed_consent/en/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. A. Kim, "Gamification 101:Designing the player journey," Goggle Tech Talk, 2011. {Online}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Y. Chou, Actionable Gamification: Beyond Points, Badges, and Leaderboards Ed. 2018, Octalysis Media, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. T. Tullis and B. Albert, "Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics," Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, MA, USA, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. D. Cáliz, L. Martínez, X. Alamán, C. Terán and R. Cáliz, "Usability Testing in Mobile Applications Involving People with Down Syndrome: A Literature Review," Computer Science & Information Technology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 117--131, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Approach to Make Software Testing for Users with Down Syndrome a little more Pleasant

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Interacción '18: Proceedings of the XIX International Conference on Human Computer Interaction
      September 2018
      232 pages
      ISBN:9781450364911
      DOI:10.1145/3233824

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 September 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Interacción '18 Paper Acceptance Rate47of73submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate109of163submissions,67%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader