ABSTRACT
Recent years have borne witness to an explosion of games research from diverse home disciplines. Much of this work concerns game design, but the games research community has yet to agree on practices and methods for examining game design that are simultaneously rigorously scholarly, flexible enough to accommodate a design-oriented perspective, and sufficiently knowledgeable of computation to engage with the materiality of games.
In this paper, we outline such an approach. We focus on the question of an appropriate method for an academic game design research practice that is grounded in making and play while respecting recoverability and context. We demonstrate what game analysis based on such a method can reveal, drawing on the case of Pippin Barr's It is as if you were doing work, and show how method and analysis in tandem can materialise tacit design knowledge, support balanced subjectivity, and illuminate the often abstract design problem space.
- 2017. GDC Vault. (2017). https://www.gdcvault.com/Google Scholar
- Espen Aarseth. 2001. Computer Game Studies, Year One. http://gamestudies.org/0101/editorial.html. Game Studies 1, 1 (July 2001).Google Scholar
- Pippin Barr. 2016--2017. 'It is As If You Were Doing Work' Process Diary. (2016--2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/tree/master/process/README.mdGoogle Scholar
- Pippin Barr. 2017. It is As If You Were Doing Work. (2017). https://pippinbarr.github.io/itisasifyouweredoingwork/Google Scholar
- Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is As If You Were Doing Work' commit c0a887d890ffd2a0b2b2dbc34aa1a214f9d3b3e4. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/commit/c0a887d890ffd2a0b2b2dbc34aa1a214f9d3b3e4Google Scholar
- Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is as if you were doing work'data.js file. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/blob/master/js/data.jsGoogle Scholar
- Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is As If You Were Doing Work' GitHub Repository. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingworkGoogle Scholar
- Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is as if you were doing work' screenshot of UI with alien text. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/commit/51b5f5d883f146b8d232f706e4cac802b33a6783Google Scholar
- Pippin Barr. 2017. 'It is as if you were doing work' screenshot of UI with placeholder text. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/blob/master/process/images/Screen%20Shot%202017-01-05%20at%2012.03.57.pngGoogle Scholar
- Pippin Barr. 2017. Press Kit for 'It Is As If You Were Doing Work'. (2017). https://github.com/pippinbarr/itisasifyouweredoingwork/tree/master/press/README.mdGoogle Scholar
- Rob Beschizza. 2017. It Is As If You Were Doing Work is a browser game celebrating Windows 3-era cubicle drudgery. (2017). https://boingboing.net/2017/07/04/it-is-as-if-you-were-doing-wor.htmlGoogle Scholar
- John Biggs. 2017. New game simulates the old grind. (2017). https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/06/new-game-simulates-the-old-grind/Google Scholar
- Mark Blythe, Kees Overbeeke, Andrew Monk, and Peter Wright. 2003. Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Springer Netherlands. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Blythe, Jamie Steane, Jenny Roe, and Caroline Oliver. 2015. Solutionism, the Game: Design Fictions for Positive Aging. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3849--3858. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tom Boellstorff, Bonnie Nardi, Celia Pearce, and T. L. Taylor. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Julia Ayumi Bopp, Elisa D. Mekler, and Klaus Opwis. 2016. Negative Emotion, Positive Experience?: Emotionally Moving Moments in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2996--3006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Bowers. 2012. The Logic of Annotated Portfolios: Communicating the Value of 'Research Through Design'. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard Buchanan. 1985. Declaration by Design: Rhetoric, Argument, and Demonstration in Design Practice. Design Issues 2, 1 (1985), 4--22.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (DIS '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 424--433. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John M. Carroll and John M. Thomas. 1988. FUN. SIGCHI Bull. 19 (January 1988), 21--24. Issue 3. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dennis Chao. 2001. Doom As an Interface for Process Management. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '01). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 152--157. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucas Colusso, Gary Hsieh, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Designing Closeness to Increase Gamers' Performance. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3020--3024. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patricia Ivette Cornelio Martinez, Silvana De Pirro, Chi Thanh Vi, and Sriram Subramanian. 2017. Agency in Mid-air Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2426--2439. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nigel Cross. 2011. Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Dalsgaard. 2010. Research in and Through Design: An Interaction Design Research Approach. In Proceedings of the 22Nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 200--203. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2012. Reflective Design Documentation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS 12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 428--437. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heather Desurvire, Martin Caplan, and Jozsef A. Toth. 2004. Using Heuristics to Evaluate the Playability of Games. In CHI'04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1509--1512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sebastian Deterding. 2017. The Pyrrhic Victory of Game Studies. Games and Culture 12, 6 (2017), 521--543.Google Scholar
- Steven P. Dow, Kate Heddleston, and Scott R. Klemmer. 2009. The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 165--174. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Markku Eskelinen. 2001. The Gaming Situation. http://www.gamestudies.org/0101/eskelinen/. Game Studies 1, 1 (July 2001).Google Scholar
- Daniel Fallman. 2007. Why Research-Oriented Design Isn't Design-Oriented Research: On the Tensions Between Design and Research in an Implicit Design Discipline. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20, 3 (01 Oct 2007), 193--200.Google Scholar
- Mary Flanagan and Helen Nissenbaum. 2014. Values at Play in Digital Games. The MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Frayling. 1993. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art.Google Scholar
- Tracy Fullerton. 2008. Game Design Workshop, Second Edition: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games (Gama Network Series) (2 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wei Gai, Chenglei Yang, Yulong Bian, Chia Shen, Xiangxu Meng, Lu Wang, Juan Liu, Mingda Dong, Chengjie Niu, and Cheng Lin. 2017. Supporting Easy Physical-to-Virtual Creation of Mobile VR Maze Games: A New Genre. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5016--5028. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bill Gaver. 2002. Designing for Homo Ludens. i3 Magazine (June 2002), 2--5.Google Scholar
- William Gaver. 2011. Making Spaces: How Design Workbooks Work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1551--1560. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Danny Godin and Mithra Zahedi. 2014. Aspects of Research through Design. In Proceedings of the Design, Research, Society Conference 2014. Umea, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. The Three Paradigms of HCI. In alt.chi 2007.Google Scholar
- Henriette C M Hoonhout. 2008. Let the Game Tester Do the Talking: Think Aloud and Interviewing to Learn About the Game Experience. In Game Usability: Advancing the Player Experience, Katherine Isbister and Noah Schaffer (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Chapter 4, 65 -- 77.Google Scholar
- Robin Hunicke, Marc Leblanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. In Proceedings of the Challenges in Game AI Workshop, Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
- Patrick W. Jordan. 2000. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Taylor & Francis, London.Google Scholar
- Mallory Ketcheson, Luke Walker, and T.C. Nicholas Graham. 2016. Thighrim and Calf-Life: A Study of the Conversion of Off-the-Shelf Video Games into Exergames. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2681--2692. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rilla Khaled and Gordon Ingram. 2012. Tales from the front lines of a large-scale serious game project. In Proceedings of CHI 2012. ACM Press, 69--78. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Annakaisa Kultima. 2015. Game Design Research. In Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (AcademicMindTrek '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18--25. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Youn-Kyung Lim, Erik Stolterman, and Josh Tenenberg. 2008. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, Article 7 (July 2008), 27 pages. Issue 2. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan Mandryk, Kori Inkpen, and Tom Calvert. 2006. Using Psychophysiological Techniques to Measure User Experience with Entertainment Technologies. Behaviour and Information Technology (Special Issue on User Experience 25, 2 (2006), 141--158.Google Scholar
- Joe Marshall, Conor Linehan, and Adrian Hazzard. 2016. Designing Brutal Multiplayer Video Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2669--2680. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jean McNiff. 2013. Action Research: Principles and Practice. Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Florian Mueller and Katherine Isbister. 2014. Movement-based Game Guidelines. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2191--2200. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janet Horowitz Murray. 1997. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The Free Press, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nintendo. 2003. WarioWare. WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgames!. (2003).Google Scholar
- Donald A. Norman. 1990. The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- James Pierce. 2014. On the Presentation and Production of Design Research Artifacts in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 735--744. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matt Ratto. 2011. Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life. The Information Society 27, 4 (2011), 252--260. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tom Regan. 2017. Recreate the thrills of '90s PC admin in this browser game. (2017). https://www.engadget.com/2017/07/06/recreate-the-thrills-of-90s-pc-admin-in-this-browser-game/Google Scholar
- Jesse Schell. 2008. The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses (1 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donald A. Schön. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Ben Shneiderman. 2004. Designing for Fun: How Can We Design User Interfaces to Be More Fun? interactions 11, 5 (Sept. 2004), 48--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herbert A. Simon. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd Ed.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anselm Strauss and Juliet M. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research : Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- T.L. Taylor. 2002. Whose game is this anyway? Negotiating corporate ownership in a virtual world. In Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference Proceedings. Tampere University Press, 227--242.Google Scholar
- James Vincent. 2017. Relive the Windows 95 glory days with this work simulation game. (July 2017). https://www.theverge.com/tldr/2017/7/6/15927338/work-simulation-game-windows-95-pippin-barrGoogle Scholar
- Sebastien Wesolowski. 2017. "It is as if you were doing work", un simulateur de travail pour un monde post-emploi. (2017). https://motherboard.vice.com/fr/article/8xaq4a/it-is-as-if-you-were-doing-work-un-simulateur-de-travail-pour-un-monde-post-emploiGoogle Scholar
- Raymond Williams. 2003. Television: Technology and Cultural Form. Routledge.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jerry Willis. 2007. Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks, SAGE PUBLISHING, CA.Google Scholar
- Zhao Zhao, Ali Arya, Anthony Whitehead, Gerry Chan, and S. Ali Etemad. 2017. Keeping Users Engaged Through Feature Updates: A Long-Term Study of Using Wearable-Based Exergames. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1053--1064. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research Through Design As a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--502. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Documenting trajectories in design space: a methodology for applied game design research
Recommendations
Game design research
AcademicMindTrek '15: Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek ConferenceIn this paper, notions of game studies, games research, game design, and design research are examined. As a most popular keyword on game research papers 'game design' connects the interdiscipline of game studies. However, it is typical that notions of '...
Generating implications for design through design research
CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA central tenet of HCI is that technology should be user-centric, with designs being based around social science findings about users. Nevertheless a repeated but critical challenge in design is translating empirical findings into actionable ideas that ...
How to Do Gameful Design
CHI PLAY '17 Extended Abstracts: Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in PlayGamification is an increasingly popular strategy for increasing user engagement. But how to design gamified systems? While there is an abundance of industry methods, they often remain elusive in essential steps and lack grounding in evidence. This course ...
Comments