skip to main content
10.1145/3239060.3239063acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Why Disable the Autopilot?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The number of systems in commercially available vehicles that assist or automate driving tasks is rapidly increasing. At least for the next decade, using such systems remains up to the discretion of the user. In this paper, different reasons why drivers may disengage the autopilot are investigated. This was done through a simulator study in which the system could drive fully automated, but where participants could also disengage the system. Qualitative data were collected about why participants disengaged the autopilot. The analysis of the data revealed six themes covering the reasons why participants disabled the autopilot: The speed maintained by the autopilot, the behavior of the autopilot in relation to overtaking other vehicles, onset of boredom, onset of sleepiness, lack of trust in the autopilot, and enjoyment of manual driving. On the basis of the results, design opportunities are proposed to counteract the tendency to not use automated driving systems.

References

  1. David Abbink and Mark Mulder. 2010. Neuromuscular Analysis as a Guideline in designing Shared Control. In Advances in Haptics. InTech.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bart van Arem, Cornelie J. G. van Driel, and Ruben Visser. 2006. The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 7, 4: 429--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Johannes Beller, Matthias Heesen, and Mark Vollrath. 2013. Improving the Driver--Automation Interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55, 6: 1130--1141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Arie P. van den Beukel, Mascha C. van der Voort, and Arthur O. Eger. 2016. Supporting the changing driver's task: Exploration of interface designs for supervision and intervention in automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 43: 279--301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mike Blommer, Reates Curry, Dev Kochhar, Rads Swaminathan, Walter Talamonti, and Louis Tijerina. 2015. The Effects of a Scheduled Driver Engagement Strategy in Automated Driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59, 1: 1681--1685.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Barry Brown and Eric Laurier. 2017. The Trouble with Autopilots: Assisted and Autonomous Driving on the Social Road. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 416--429. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stephen M. Casner, Edwin L. Hutchins, and Don Norman. 2016. The challenges of partially automated driving. Communications of the ACM 59, 5: 70--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Stefan Diewald, Andreas Möller, Luis Roalter, Tobias Stockinger, and Matthias Kranz. 2013. Gameful design in the automotive domain -- Review, Outlook and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '13, 262--265. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kai Eckoldt, Martin Knobel, Marc Hassenzahl, and Josef Schumann. 2012. An Experiential Perspective on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. it - Information Technology 54: 165--171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. James Elander, Robert West, and Davina French. 1993. Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road traffic crash risk: an examination of methods and findings. 113, 2: 279--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mica R. Endsley. 1995. Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37, 1: 32--64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Anna-Katharina Frison, Philipp Wintersberger, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Schartmüller. 2017. Driving Hotzenplotz: A Hybrid Interface for Vehicle Control Aiming to Maximize Pleasure in Highway Driving. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '17, 236--244. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Pilar Tejero Gimeno, Gemma Pastor Cerezuela, and Mariano Choliz Montanes. 2006. On the concept and measurement of driver drowsiness, fatigue and inattention: implications for countermeasures. International Journal of Vehicle Design 42, 1/2: 67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hanneke Hooft van Huysduynen, Jacques Terken, and Berry Eggen. 2016. Encouraging the Use of ADAS through Personalized Persuasion. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - Automotive 'UI 16, 105--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hanneke Hooft van Huysduynen, Jacques Terken, Jean Bernard Martens, and Berry Eggen. 2015. Measuring driving styles: a validation of the multidimensional driving style inventory. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15, 257--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mishel Johns, Brian Mok, David Sirkin, Nikhil Gowda, Catherine Smith, Walter Talamonti, and Wendy Ju. 2016. Exploring shared control in automated driving. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 91--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Miltos Kyriakidis, Riender Happee, and Joost C.F. de Winter. 2015. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 32: 127--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Timo Lajunen and Heikki Summala. 1995. Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers' self-assessments. Personality and Individual Differences 19, 3: 307--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. John D. Lee and Katrina A. See. 2004. Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46, 1: 50--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Robert E Llaneras, Jeremy Salinger, and Charles A Green. 2013. Human Factors Issues Associated with Limited Ability Autonomous Driving Systems: Driver' Allocation of Visual Attention to the Forward Roadway. In the Seventh International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, 92--98. Retrieved December 8, 2015 from http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1363482Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Bella. Martin and Bruce M. Hanington. 2012. Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems, develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions. Rockport Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jennifer F. May and Carryl L. Baldwin. 2009. Driver fatigue: The importance of identifying causal factors of fatigue when considering detection and countermeasure technologies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 12, 3: 218--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. William L Mikulas and Stephen J Vodanovich. 1993. The essence of boredom. The Psychological Record 43, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. David Miller, Annabel Sun, Mishel Johns, Hillary Ive, David Sirkin, Sudipto Aich, and Wendy Ju. 2015. Distraction Becomes Engagement in Automated Driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 59, 1: 1676--1680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Armen A. Mkrtchyan, Jamie C. Macbeth, Erin T. Solovey, Jason C. Ryan, and M. L. Cummings. 2012. Using Variable-Rate Alerting to Counter Boredom in Human Supervisory Control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 56, 1: 1441--1445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Brian Mok, Mishel Johns, David Miller, and Wendy Ju. 2017. Tunneled In: Drivers with Active Secondary Tasks Need More Time to Transition from Automation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17, 2840--2844. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sina Nordhoff, Bart van Arem, and Riender Happee. 2016. Conceptual Model to Explain, Predict, and Improve User Acceptance of Driverless Podlike Vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2602: 60--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Raja Parasuraman and Victor Riley. 1997. Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39, 2: 230--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Jean-François Petiot, Bjørn G. Kristensen, and Anja M. Maier. 2013. How Should an Electric Vehicle Sound? User and Expert Perception. In Volume 5: 25th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; ASME 2013 Power Transmission and Gearing Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. SAE International. J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems - SAE International. Retrieved March 1, 2018 from https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201401/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Wouter J Schakel, Bart Van Arem, and Bart D Netten. 2010. Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic Flow Stability. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on, Idm: 759--764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Ronald Schroeter, Jim Oxtoby, and Daniel Johnson. 2014. AR and Gamification Concepts to Reduce Driver Boredom and Risk Taking Behaviours. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '14, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Neville A. Stanton, Mark S. Young, and B. McCaulder. 1997. Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science 27, 2--3: 149--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Sonja Stockert, Natalie Tara Richardson, and Markus Lienkamp. 2015. Driving in an Increasingly Automated World -- Approaches to Improve the Driver-automation Interaction. Procedia Manufacturing 3: 2889--2896.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Niklas Strand, Josef Nilsson, I.C. MariAnne Karlsson, and Lena Nilsson. 2014. Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27: 218--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Heikki Summala. 2007. Towards understanding motivational and emotional factors in driver behaviour: Comfort through satisficing. In Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments: Critical Issues in Driver Interactions with Intelligent Transport Systems. 189--207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Orit Taubman-Ben-Ari, Mario Mikulincer, and Omri Gillath. 2004. The multidimensional driving style inventory--scale construct and validation. Accident Analysis & Prevention 36, 3: 323--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Frank M. F. Verberne, Jaap Ham, and Cees J. H. Midden. 2012. Trust in Smart Systems: Sharing Driving Goals and Giving Information to Increase Trustworthiness and Acceptability of Smart Systems in Cars. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54, 5: 799--810.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Volvo. Overtaking assistance with the Adaptive Cruise control*. Retrieved September 14, 2017 from http://support.volvocars.com/hk/cars/Pages/owners-manual.aspx?mc=v526&my=2016&sw=15w46&article=0a55ef938975ba62c0a8015148dad001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Robert West and Jane Hall. 1997. The Role of Personality and Attitudes in Traffic Accident Risk. Applied Psychology 46, 3: 253--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Joost C.F. de Winter, Riender Happee, Marieke H. Martens, and Neville A. Stanton. 2014. Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: A review of the empirical evidence. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27: 196--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Nidzamuddin Md. Yusof, Juffrizal Karjanto, Jacques Terken, Frank Delbressine, Muhammad Zahir Hassan, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2016. The Exploration of Autonomous Vehicle Driving Styles. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - Automotive 'UI 16, 245--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Autopilot | Tesla. Retrieved August 31, 2017 from https://www.tesla.com/autopilot?redirect=noGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. The new Audi A8 -- conditional automated at level 3 | Audi MediaCenter. Retrieved March 2, 2018 from https://www.audi-mediacenter.com/en/on-autopilot-into-the-future-the-audi-vision-of-autonomous-driving-9305/the-new-audi-a8-conditional-automated-at-level-3-9307Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Drive Me -- the self-driving car in action | Volvo Cars. Retrieved August 30, 2017 from http://www.volvocars.com/intl/about/our-innovation-brands/intellisafe/autonomous-driving/drive-meGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Waymso. Retrieved September 4, 2017 from https://waymo.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Here's how Daimler is evolving its tiny Smart car for self-driving - The Verge. Retrieved August 31, 2017 from https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/30/16226514/smart-vision-eq-electric-future-car2goGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Why Disable the Autopilot?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      AutomotiveUI '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      September 2018
      374 pages
      ISBN:9781450359467
      DOI:10.1145/3239060

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 September 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader