skip to main content
10.1145/3239092.3265952acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

personalDash: First Steps Towards User-controlled Personalization of 3D Dashboards with Mobile Devices

Published:23 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the sharing-economy, users do not necessarily own a car but use commercial services to rent a car according to their needs, requirements, and liking. To provide the best driving experience and safety, it is necessary that they understand the car and its functionality. Assuming that future vehicles will facilitate mostly screens for information presentation, a possible way to foster this understanding is by remote user-controlled dashboard personalization. By that, users can design a layout according to their individual preferences prior to the drive and by that, use a familiar looking dashboard. Main contributions of this work are (1) first design guidelines for mobile applications allowing personalization of dashboards and (2) information on users views regarding dashboard personalization. Results of a design workshop with usability experts and a follow-up usability study show that user-controlled personalization has potential and our design guidelines provide a valid foundation for future research.

References

  1. Stewart Birrell, Mark Young, Neville Stanton, and Paul Jennings. 2017. Using Adaptive Interfaces to Encourage Smart Driving and Their Effect on Driver Workload. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. 31--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nora Broy. 2016. Stereoscopic 3D User Interfaces: Exploring the Potentials and Risks of 3D Displays in Cars. Dissertation. Universität Stuttgart.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Riccardo Coppola, Maurizio Morisio, and Politecnico Torino. 2016. Connected Car: Technologies, Issues, Future Trends. Comput. Surveys 49, 3 (2016), 1--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Leah Findlater and Joanna McGrenere. 2004. A Comparison of Static, Adaptive, and Adaptable Menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. R. Garzon. 2012. Intelligent In-Car-Infotainment Systems: A Contextual Personalized Approach. In 2012 Eighth International Conference on Intelligent Environments. 315--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Andreas Heigemeyr and Andreas Harrer. 2014. Information Management for Adaptive Automotive Human Machine Interfaces. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (2014), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Martin Jentsch, Patrick Roßner, Alexander Missbach, and Angelika C Bullinger. 2015. Adaptivität oder Adaptierbarkeit im Fahrzeug -- Leitfaden und Konzepte zur optimalen Fahrerunterstützung. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. E. Martin and S. Shaheen. 2015. The impact of carsharing on household vehicle ownership. ACCESS Magazine 38 (1) (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Joanna McGrenere, Ronald M. Baecker, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2007. A Field Evaluation of an Adaptable Two-interface Design for Feature-rich Software. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 14, 1, Article 3 (May 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. E Petersen, Y Zhang, and A Darwiche. 2016. Modeling Car Sharing and Its Impact on Auto Ownership: Evidence from Vancouver and Seattle. In TAC 2016: Efficient Transportation - Managing the Demand - 2016 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada. https://trid.trb.org/view/1434888Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernhard Preim and Raimund Dachselt. 2015. Interaktive Systeme: Band 2: User Interface Engineering, 3D-lnteraktion, Natural User Interfaces. eXamen.press, Vol. XXXIII. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. 81--87 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jóhannes Ingi Árnason, Jannik Jepsen, Allan Koudal, Michael Rosendahl Schmidt, and Stefania Serafin. 2014. Volvo intelligent news: A context aware multi modal proactive recommender system for in-vehicle use. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 14 (2014), 95--111. Special Issue on Pervasive Education Special Issue on The Social Car: Socially-inspired Mechanisms for Future Mobility Services. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. personalDash: First Steps Towards User-controlled Personalization of 3D Dashboards with Mobile Devices

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            AutomotiveUI '18: Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
            September 2018
            282 pages
            ISBN:9781450359474
            DOI:10.1145/3239092

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 September 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

            Upcoming Conference

          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader